CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ2038785 (VNO 0426080), ADJ900602 (VNO 0426045), ADJ2562931 (VNO 0494371), ADJ7032939, ADJ7045667
Regular
Aug 01, 2019

JOSEPH PROTHRO vs. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND as administered by ACCLAMATION INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, involving multiple claim numbers for Joseph Prothro against State Compensation Insurance Fund, has been granted reconsideration. The Board rescinded the prior WCJ's decision because a settlement has been proposed. The case is now returned to the WCJ to evaluate the settlement, with the option to reinstate the original decision if the settlement is not approved. This decision is not a final determination on the merits.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGrant ReconsiderationRescind DecisionReturn to Trial LevelWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeProposed SettlementApproval of SettlementReinstating Original DecisionFinal Decision
References
Case No. ADJ3346924
Regular
Oct 02, 2013

JORGE RAMIREZ vs. BOARD FORD, PACIFIC COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) prior decision. The WCAB rescinded the ALJ's decision and remanded the case back to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision. This action means the original decision is nullified, and the case will be re-evaluated by the ALJ. The parties retain the right to seek further reconsideration of any future ALJ ruling.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDOPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATIONDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATIONPetition for Reconsiderationworkers' compensation administrative law judgeWCJgrant reconsiderationrescind WCJ's decisionfurther proceedingstrial level
References
Case No. ADJ11154163
Regular
Jan 09, 2019

FAUSTO DIAZ vs. C OVERAA & COMPANY, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded its prior decision and returned the case to the trial level. This action allows the workers' compensation administrative law judge to review a proposed settlement reached between the applicant and defendant. If the settlement is not approved, the original decision can be reinstated, and either party may seek reconsideration. This is not a final ruling on the merits of the case.

ReconsiderationWithdrawal without prejudicePetition for ReconsiderationProposed settlementRescinded decisionReturned to trial levelWCJ approvalReinstating original decisionFinal decision on meritsFindings of Fact
References
Case No. ADJ13119496
Regular
Sep 29, 2025

Ariel Prudente vs. RJP Framing, Inc., Alaska National Insurance Company

Applicant Ariel Prudente sought removal of a WCJ's order to replace psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME) Dr. Peter Turek. The WCJ's decision stemmed from applicant's attorney providing "summaries and excerpts from the Kite decisions" to Dr. Turek, which was deemed a violation of Labor Code section 4062.3(b). The Appeals Board found that the WCJ's order lacked sufficient rationale and evidence of prejudice to justify Dr. Turek's replacement. Consequently, the Board granted the petition for removal, rescinded the WCJ's June 18, 2025 Findings and Order, and remanded the matter for further proceedings, emphasizing the need for less drastic measures than QME replacement.

PQMEPetition for RemovalLabor Code section 4062.3(b)Kite decisionsVigil v. County of KernSuon v. California DairiesMaxham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitationex parte communicationsubstantial justiceAOE/COE
References
Case No. ADJ1433114
Regular
Aug 25, 2011

ANTONIO RAMIREZ vs. TRINITY BROADCASTING NETWORK, TRINITY CHRISTIAN CENTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision in the case of Ramirez v. Trinity Broadcasting Network. The WCAB rescinded the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. This action means the prior ruling is vacated, and the case will be re-evaluated by the ALJ. The parties still retain the right to seek reconsideration of any subsequent decision.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardTrinity Broadcasting NetworkTrinity Christian CenterState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJrescindreturned to trial level
References
Case No. ADJ2065472
Regular
Aug 15, 2013

CARLOS DURAN vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, SEDGWICK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of the WCJ's prior decision in *Carlos Duran v. Ralphs Grocery Company*. The WCAB rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision. This action means the prior decision is no longer in effect and the case will be reheard by the WCJ. The parties retain their rights to seek further reconsideration of any new decision.

WCABReconsiderationRescindedReturned to Trial LevelFurther ProceedingsWCJ DecisionAdministrative Law JudgeRalphs Grocery CompanySedgwickCarlos Duran
References
Case No. ADJ9249044
Regular
May 16, 2017

PABLO SERRANO-CAMPOS vs. FACTORS FAMOUS DELI, INC., AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. The Board rescinded the February 26, 2017 decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings. This decision is not a final determination on the merits. Parties retain their right to seek reconsideration of the WCJ's subsequent decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ's ReportAdopt and IncorporateGrant ReconsiderationRescind DecisionFurther ProceedingsDecision After ReconsiderationTrial LevelFinal Decision
References
Case No. OAK 0329422
Regular
Jun 30, 2008

RAFAEL PEREZ vs. AMERICAN EMPIRE BUILDING, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a previous decision in the case of Rafael Perez v. American Empire Building and Liberty Mutual Insurance. The WCAB rescinded the original decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the workers' compensation administrative law judge. This action indicates the prior decision was not finalized and the case will undergo further review.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationRescind DecisionReturn to Trial LevelFurther ProceedingsAdministrative Law JudgeApplicantDefendantsLiberty Mutual Insurance
References
Case No. ADJ4419054
Regular
Jan 29, 2009

RESCILLA MAXIM vs. LACMTA, TRAVELERS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision concerning applicant Priscilla Maxim's case against LACMTA and Travelers. The WCAB rescinded the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decision, finding it necessary to return the matter for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This order signifies that the prior decision was not a final resolution on the merits of the claims. The parties retain all rights to seek further reconsideration of the WCJ's subsequent ruling.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationRescind DecisionFurther ProceedingsWCJ DecisionTrial LevelLACMTATravelersPriscilla Maxim
References
Showing 1-10 of 8,392 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational