CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ994369
Regular
Jan 19, 2014

JOSE JUAREZ vs. WATKINS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is reconsidering a decision that awarded the applicant medical mileage and a penalty for unreasonable delay in compensation payments but denied attorney's fees. The WCAB believes attorney's fees are warranted under Labor Code section 5814.5 for enforcing the payment of awarded compensation. The case is being returned to the trial level for the judge to determine and award these attorney's fees.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardMedical Mileage Expense ReimbursementAttorney's FeesLabor Code Section 5814Labor Code Section 5813Labor Code Section 5814.5Cumulative Industrial InjuryPulmonary System Injury
References
0
Case No. ADJ4140574 (VNO 0417628) ADJ3588068 (VNO 0472981)
Regular
Jun 03, 2013

KEVIN THOMPSON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board awarded applicant Kevin Thompson an additional attorney's fee of $1,500 under Labor Code section 5801. This fee is for services rendered by his attorney in successfully defending against the defendant's petition for writ of review to the Court of Appeal. The Board disallowed the requested clerical fees as section 5801 applies only to attorney services. Additionally, the request for costs under Labor Code section 5811 was denied due to the lack of required itemization and supporting documentation.

Labor Code § 5801Attorney's feePetition for Writ of ReviewAppeals BoardSupplemental awardReasonable attorney's feeAppellate levelPenaltyClerical servicesLabor Code § 5811
References
12
Case No. ADJ3905674 (SRO 0031254)
Regular
Feb 02, 2011

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of its decision regarding attorney's fees. The applicant's attorney sought fees under Labor Code sections 4607 and 5814.5, arguing the defendant unreasonably failed to appoint a new case manager and pay prior bills. The Board affirmed the judge's finding that Labor Code § 4607 fees are inapplicable when the entire award is not terminated, and Labor Code § 5814.5 fees require an existing award and unreasonable refusal to pay. The Board found no evidence of unreasonable delay by the defendant in appointing a new case manager, thus denying the petition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationAttorney's FeesLabor Code Section 4607Labor Code Section 5814.5Medical TreatmentCompromise and ReleasePetition for PenaltyNurse Case ManagerStipulations
References
2
Case No. ADJ1309169 (AHM 0045971)
Regular
Jul 30, 2009

MARY PRUITT vs. CNA INSURANCE CO., AMERICAN CASUALTY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award of attorneys' fees under Labor Code § 5814.5. The Board found the prior decision lacked a proper evidentiary record and the necessary predicate finding of increased compensation under Labor Code § 5814 required for § 5814.5 attorneys' fees. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to ensure compliance with evidentiary record requirements and to re-evaluate the § 5814.5 attorneys' fees issue.

WCABReconsiderationLabor Code § 5814.5Attorneys' FeesIncreased CompensationLabor Code § 5814Findings and AwardWCJEvidence RecordMinutes of Hearing
References
1
Case No. RIV 0077306
Regular
May 09, 2008

D. ENVER CLAWSON vs. PIER ONE IMPORTS, ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded an award of attorney's fees, finding they are only available under Labor Code § 5814.5 "in addition to" a penalty award under Labor Code § 5814 for unreasonable delay or refusal of treatment. Because the applicant did not seek a § 5814 penalty, the WCAB returned the case for further proceedings to allow the applicant to pursue such a penalty.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationLabor Code § 5814.5Labor Code § 5814Attorney's FeesMedical TreatmentStipulated AwardUnreasonable DelayRefusal to Provide TreatmentPenalty
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

National Labor Relations Board v. Goodman

This case involves an appeal concerning the interaction between the National Labor Relations Act and the Bankruptcy Code. Appellants, the NLRB and the Union, challenged a Bankruptcy Court order that shielded James M. Goodman and Goodman Automatic Sprinkler Corporation (GASC) from labor law liabilities based on Goodman's Chapter 7 discharge. The District Court affirmed that Goodman's personal discharge protects him from pre-petition monetary and non-monetary obligations arising from a rejected collective bargaining agreement. However, the court reversed the Bankruptcy Court's finding that GASC was also shielded, concluding that Goodman's discharge does not protect GASC from alleged obligations. The case was remanded to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings, including a determination of the alter-ego status of Goodman and GASC under applicable labor law standards.

BankruptcyChapter 7National Labor Relations ActUnfair Labor PracticesAlter Ego DoctrineCollective Bargaining AgreementDischargeable DebtsPrimary JurisdictionLabor LawEmployer Obligations
References
16
Case No. CA 16-00663
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 10, 2017

INTERNATIONAL UNION (DISTRICT) v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF LABOR

This case involves an appeal concerning the interpretation of Labor Law § 220 (3-e) in New York, specifically regarding the prevailing wage for glazier apprentices on public works projects. Plaintiffs, a consortium of unions, individuals, and businesses, challenged the New York State Department of Labor's (DOL) interpretation that glazier apprentices performing work classified for another trade (like ironworkers) must be paid at the journeyman rate for that other trade. The Supreme Court initially dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint, upholding the DOL's position. However, the Appellate Division reversed this decision, ruling that Labor Law § 220 (3-e) permits glazier apprentices registered in a bona fide program to be paid apprentice rates, irrespective of whether the work performed falls under a different trade classification. The court concluded that the DOL's interpretation was contrary to the plain meaning of the statute and thus not entitled to deference.

Apprenticeship ProgramsLabor LawPublic Works ProjectsGlaziersIronworkersPrevailing WageStatutory InterpretationNew York State Department of LaborDeclaratory JudgmentAppellate Review
References
33
Case No. OXN 0140967
Regular
Jan 07, 2008

HILDA HERNANDEZ vs. AMERICAN TOOTH INDUSTRIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and amended the decision. The WCAB affirmed the Labor Code section 5814 penalty for the employer's unreasonable delay in paying a portion of the deposition attorney's fees. However, the WCAB rescinded the Labor Code section 5814.5 attorney's fees award because there was no prior enforcement of an award to justify them, and remanded the issue of sanctions for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code section 5710deposition attorney's feesLabor Code section 5814unreasonable delayLabor Code section 5814.5attorney's feesenforcement of awardreconsiderationWCJ
References
0
Case No. OAK 242409, OAK 242410
Regular
Nov 11, 2008

TINA CHASE vs. BOB'S FOAM FACTORY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, BROADSPIRE

The WCAB granted reconsideration, affirming the applicant's award for acupuncture treatment as recommended by Dr. Lin. However, the Board denied attorney fees under Labor Code sections 5814 and 5814.5 due to the defendant's arguments regarding delay and date of injury applicability. The issue of attorney fees under Labor Code section 4607 was deferred pending California Supreme Court decisions addressing similar attorney fee disputes.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardBob's Foam FactoryCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationSuperior National Insurance CompanyBroadspirePetition for ReconsiderationAcupuncture TreatmentDr. LinLabor Code section 5814.5Attorney Fees
References
2
Case No. ADJ2589823, ADJ3219675, and ADJ2540345
Regular
Jan 15, 2018

KIM RIVERS vs. AON CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the prior award. The Board found the defendant unreasonably delayed both permanent and temporary disability indemnity payments, warranting two separate $10,000 Labor Code section 5814 penalties. The applicant's counsel was awarded $6,000 in attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5814.5 for enforcing the prior award. Further penalties and fees for delays after the initial award were deferred.

Labor Code section 5814Labor Code section 5814.5Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardStipulation and Awardpermanent disability indemnitytemporary disability indemnityunreasonably delayedattorney feesWCJ
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 8,009 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational