CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2021 NY Slip Op 01018 [191 AD3d 548]
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 16, 2021

Matter of Tenants United Fighting for the Lower E. Side v. City of New York Dept. of City Planning

The Appellate Division reversed a lower court order that had annulled approvals by the New York City Planning Commission (CPC) for new building constructions. The Supreme Court had initially granted petitions from Tenants United Fighting for the Lower East Side and Lower East Side Organized Neighbors. The appellate court held that the Supreme Court should have deferred to the CPC's reasonable interpretation of the New York City Zoning Resolution (ZR). Specifically, the Appellate Division clarified that ZR § 78-043's requirement for findings as a condition precedent only applies to modifications granted by special permit or authorization, not to other types of modifications to large-scale residential developments. Consequently, the petitions were denied and the proceedings dismissed.

Zoning ResolutionLarge-Scale Residential DevelopmentCity Planning CommissionAdministrative LawAppellate ReviewJudicial DeferenceStatutory InterpretationArticle 78 ProceedingNYC ZoningUrban Planning
References
7
Case No. 2022 NY Slip Op 02559
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 20, 2022

Ortega v. Panther Siding & Windows, Inc.

The plaintiff Rene Ortega was injured after falling from a roof while working as a foreman for a subcontractor, Golden Hammer Construction Group, Corp., which was working for Panther Siding & Windows, Inc. Ortega sued Panther Siding & Windows, Inc., alleging violations of Labor Law sections and common-law negligence. The Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed this decision. The court found that Panther Siding & Windows, Inc., established it was neither the general contractor nor an agent of the owner at the accident site, thus lacking the nondelegable duty under Labor Law § 240 (1), and Ortega failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Personal InjuryFall from heightLabor LawSummary JudgmentAppellate ReviewContractor LiabilitySubcontractorConstruction AccidentElevation-related riskSafety devices
References
4
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 07650, 530727
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 17, 2020

Matter of Semrau v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA Inc.

Claimant, Daniel G. Semrau, appealed a Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) decision denying him a zero percent schedule loss of use (SLU) award for his left leg following a work injury in January 2016 that included a left knee injury and a tear to his left medial hamstring. Both his treating orthopedist, Rola Rashid, and the employer's orthopedist, James McGlowan, agreed he reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) and had a permanent hamstring impairment, with differing SLU percentages (25% and 10% respectively). The WCB modified a Workers' Compensation Law Judge's initial finding, concluding Semrau was not entitled to any SLU award due to the absence of a specific special consideration for hamstring impairment in the 2018 Workers' Compensation Guidelines. The Appellate Division, Third Department, reversed the WCB's decision, determining that the lack of a specific guideline for hamstring tears did not preclude an SLU award for a leg impairment, and a medical expert could rationally rely on a similar guideline, like that for quadricep ruptures, as a close corollary. The case was remitted to the WCB for a proper determination of claimant's SLU award.

Workers' CompensationSchedule Loss of Use (SLU)Hamstring InjuryMedical Impairment GuidelinesAppellate DivisionThird DepartmentMaximum Medical Improvement (MMI)Orthopedic EvaluationRemittalCausation
References
22
Case No. ADJ9226526
Regular
Dec 04, 2020

MARIE RODGERS vs. SACRAMENTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCHOOLS INSURANCE AUTHORITY

This case concerns the proper calculation of permanent disability ratings in a workers' compensation claim. The applicant, Marie Rodgers, injured her lumbar spine, left leg, left hip, and left knee. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and amended the prior decision. The WCAB affirmed the finding of 24% permanent disability but corrected the indemnity amount to reflect the 2013 date of injury and an adjusted attorney fee. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning that impairments within the same body region must be combined first, utilizing the AMA Guides' Combined Values Chart, before combining with impairments from other regions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationReport of WCJAMA GuidesCombined Values ChartPermanent ImpairmentLeft Lower ExtremityLumbar SpineApportionmentDate of Injury
References
2
Case No. 2023 NY Slip Op 06426 [222 AD3d 1154]
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 14, 2023

Matter of Villagil v. Sauce Pizzeria III, LLC

Daniel Villagil, a cook, sustained lower back and left leg injuries from boiling water in 2019. His treating physician proposed a 20% schedule loss of use (SLU) award for his left leg, citing maximum medical improvement and permanent impairment. However, the employer and carrier objected, leading a Workers' Compensation Law Judge to deny the award due to the physician's report lacking explanation for the SLU calculation or documentation of functional impairments. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed this decision, finding no credible medical evidence, which was subsequently affirmed by the Appellate Division, Third Department. The court noted the conclusory nature of the physician's report, which failed to detail test results or specific impairments to support an SLU award.

schedule loss of useSLU awardpermanent impairmentmaximum medical improvementMMImedical evidencefunctional impairmentscarringgoniometerrange of motion
References
7
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 06424 [188 AD3d 1381]
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 12, 2020

Matter of Hluska v. Central New York Psychiatric Ctr.

Claimant Kevin Hluska, who previously received a 13% schedule loss of use (SLU) award for his left arm due to a 2016 shoulder injury, sustained a new work-related injury to his left elbow in 2017. His physician determined this new injury resulted in a 10% SLU of the left arm. The Workers' Compensation Law Judge and the Workers' Compensation Board ruled that claimant was not entitled to a further SLU award for the elbow injury because the previous SLU award for the same arm exceeded the current impairment. The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed this decision, citing Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (3), which limits SLU awards for permanent impairments to specific body parts and allows for multiple awards only if for more than one member or parts of more than one member, but the total award for a member is capped.

Schedule Loss of UseSLU AwardLeft Arm InjuryElbow InjuryShoulder InjuryWorkers' Compensation Board DecisionAppellate Division Third DepartmentPermanent ImpairmentPrior AwardSubsequent Injury
References
4
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 05085
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 23, 2020

Wein v. East Side 11th & 28th, LLC

Shane Wein and his wife initiated an action against East Side 11th & 28th, LLC, and SBF Construction, Inc., seeking damages for personal injuries sustained by Mr. Wein during the assembly of a tower crane at a construction site. The plaintiffs alleged violations of Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and 241 (6), along with common-law negligence. The Supreme Court's order was subsequently appealed by both parties. The Appellate Division modified the order, granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim predicated on 12 NYCRR 23-8.1 (f) (2) (i). Conversely, it granted the defendants' cross-motion, dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) claims based on 12 NYCRR 23-8.1 (f) (1) (iv) and 23-8.2 (c) (3), and the Labor Law § 200 claim against SBF Construction, Inc., as modified, the order was affirmed.

Personal InjuryLabor LawSummary JudgmentConstruction AccidentHoist OperationStatutory ViolationAppellate ReviewWorkplace SafetyNegligenceComparative Negligence
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Zlateff v. Contour Erection & Siding Systems, Inc.

Daniel Zlateff, president and sole shareholder of Z-Boing, Inc., was injured while bungee jumping during an exhibition event. The crane for the event was provided by Contour Erection & Siding Systems, Inc., and the event was planned by Zlateff, Linda Monforte, and Christopher Eberle. Monforte owned the property where the event occurred and also managed Erie Shores, Inc., which operated Calico Jack’s Restaurant. Eberle was the president of Contour. The Supreme Court had previously granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint against the defendants. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, reinstating the complaint, citing material issues of fact that preclude summary judgment. These issues include the existence and identity of a joint venture, the availability of workers’ compensation coverage, and whether Zlateff was an employee or acting independently to further his own business.

Bungee Jumping AccidentSummary Judgment AppealJoint Venture DisputeWorkers' Compensation CoverageEmployment StatusPersonal InjuryNegligencePremises LiabilityCorporate LiabilityAppellate Review
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Bromley v. Rich Aluminum & Vinyl Siding, Inc.

Claimant, a sales manager for a vinyl siding company, allegedly injured his left knee in 2001 while inspecting a customer's roof. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge disallowed his claim, citing lack of credibility, a decision affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board in April 2003. No appeal was taken from that initial Board decision. Claimant subsequently applied for reconsideration and/or full Board review of the April 2003 decision, which was denied in May 2004. This appeal was limited to reviewing the denial of the application for reconsideration, not the merits of the underlying 2003 Board decision. The Appellate Division affirmed the denial, finding it was not arbitrary or capricious, as the Board had discretion to reject a coworker's recanted affidavit as not credible.

Appellate ReviewReconsideration DenialBoard ReviewCredibility AssessmentAccidental InjuryCourse of EmploymentJudicial DiscretionAbuse of DiscretionArbitrary and CapriciousRecanted Testimony
References
6
Case No. ADJ13011053
Regular
Sep 08, 2025

NORBERTO GARCIA vs. DOMINATION COLLABORATION, INC., AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY

Norberto Garcia, a cook, sustained multiple industrial injuries including to his psyche, spine, shoulders, left ankle, lower extremities/gait, kidneys, and in the form of hypertension, anemia, diabetes, and left foot amputation. The WCJ awarded 100% permanent disability, finding that the impairments should be added due to their synergistic effects. Defendants petitioned for reconsideration, arguing errors in combining impairments and apportionment. The Appeals Board denied the petition, affirming the WCJ's findings that Dr. Lonky's medical opinions supported the additive approach for disability calculation and that even with minor adjustments, the applicant's permanent disability still exceeded 100%.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardPermanent DisabilityApportionmentHypertensive Cardiovascular DiseaseRenal DiseaseDiabetes MellitusLeft Foot AmputationGait DerangementVocational Evaluation
References
17
Showing 1-10 of 1,821 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational