CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ1959578
Regular
Oct 20, 2011

PHILIP DANIELS vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Legally Uninsured, Administered by TRISTAR RISK MANANGEMENT, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

In ADJ1959578, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration of an August 5, 2011 decision. This decision was made to allow the WCAB further time to thoroughly study the factual and legal issues presented. The Board believes this step is necessary for a complete understanding of the record and to ensure a just and reasoned final decision. All future communications in this matter should be directed to the WCAB's Office of the Commissioners in San Francisco.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionSubsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundCounty of Los AngelesLegally UninsuredTristar Risk Management
References
Case No. ADJ9433946
Regular
Feb 19, 2015

ELLEN REED vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency

In *Reed v. State of California, CDCR California Correctional Center*, the applicant, Ellen Reed, petitioned for reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted this petition. The Board believes reconsideration is necessary to allow further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Pending the decision after reconsideration, all filings must be submitted in writing directly to the WCAB Commissioners in San Francisco, not to any district office or via e-filing.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting PetitionStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionFurther ProceedingsOffice of the CommissionersElectronic Adjudication Management SystemRedding District Office
References
Case No. ADJ1415493 (MON 0254625) ADJ2515529 (POM 0136019)
Regular
Jul 22, 2011

MARIA NEVAREZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, legally uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involves defendant's petitions for reconsideration of two prior decisions. The Board granted these petitions to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues. This action is necessary to fully understand the record and issue a just decision. All further communications in this matter are to be directed to the Office of the Commissioners.

MARIA NEVAREZDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSlegally uninsuredSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDAdjusting AgencyJoint Findings and AwardAmended Joint Findings and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardOpinion and Order
References
Case No. ADJ233069 (SBR 0337173)
Regular
Oct 11, 2011

RALPH WRIGHT vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a petition for reconsideration filed by a lien claimant concerning a decision previously issued. The Board found reconsideration necessary to allow further study of the factual and legal issues presented. This action is intended to ensure a complete understanding of the record and to enable the issuance of a just and reasoned decision after reconsideration. All future communications regarding this case must be filed with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Office of the Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionOffice of the CommissionersDecision After ReconsiderationLien claimantLegally Uninsured
References
Case No. ADJ4330842 (VNO 0331594) ADJ1775987 (VNO 0376271) ADJ207082 (VNO 0314241)
Regular
Mar 12, 2009

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves petitions for reconsideration filed by the defendant and a lien claimant concerning a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted these petitions due to statutory time constraints and a need for further review of the factual and legal issues. The Board requires additional time to thoroughly understand the record and issue a just decision. All future communications regarding this matter should be directed to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Reconsideration unit.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetitions for ReconsiderationState Compensation Insurance FundDepartment of TransportationLegally UninsuredDecision After ReconsiderationStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionFurther proceedings
References
Case No. ADJ9621960
Regular
Nov 27, 2017

JOSEPH POTTER vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS - INMATE CLAIMS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendants' petition for reconsideration of a prior decision. This action was taken to allow further examination of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just outcome. Pending a decision after reconsideration, all related filings must be submitted directly to the Office of the Commissioners in San Francisco, not to any district office or through EAMS. Trial-level documents unrelated to the petition may continue to be filed through EAMS, but proposed settlements require notification to the Appeals Board as a WCJ cannot act on them during reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationInmate ClaimsLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundElectronic Adjudication Management SystemDistrict OfficeCommissioner's OfficeDecision After ReconsiderationStatutory Time Constraints
References
Case No. ADJ7756309
Regular
Jan 09, 2012

Miguel Robles vs. Evolution Fresh, Inc., Amtrust North America

In **Robles v. Evolution Fresh, Inc.**, the applicant sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration. This action was taken to allow further study of the factual and legal issues presented in the case. The Board aims to issue a just and reasoned decision after thorough review and potential further proceedings.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Decisionstatutory time constraintsfactual and legal issuesjust and reasoned decisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersRonnie G. CaplaneDejdra E. Lowe
References
Showing 1-10 of 9,352 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational