CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 03-10-00160-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 31, 2010

William H. Kuntz, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation Frank S. Denton v. Reema Khan, D/B/A Salon Rupa - Shapes Brow Bar

This appeal concerns district court orders that partially denied a plea to the jurisdiction and granted a temporary injunction. The appellants, governmental defendants including the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation and its executive director and members, faced claims from appellee Reema Khan, who operates eyebrow threading businesses. Khan was penalized for practicing cosmetology without a license and challenged this, arguing eyebrow threading is not within the statutory scope of cosmetology. The appellate court reversed the district court's denial of the plea to the jurisdiction for Khan's declaratory claims, dismissing them as redundant to her Administrative Procedures Act (APA) judicial review claim. However, the court affirmed the temporary injunction, finding no abuse of discretion given Khan's viable APA claim and probable right to recovery against the Department's regulation of eyebrow threading.

Cosmetology RegulationEyebrow ThreadingAdministrative Procedures ActDeclaratory Judgments ActPlea to JurisdictionTemporary InjunctionStatutory InterpretationProfessional LicensingGovernmental AuthorityUltra Vires Act
References
24
Case No. 15-25-00033-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 19, 2025

Edith Okechukwu Omietimi v. Texas Board of Nursing

This case concerns Edith Omietimi's appeal against the Texas Board of Nursing's (BON) denial of her Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) license renewal. The denial stemmed from an FBI investigation, "Operation Nightingale," which uncovered a fraudulent nursing diploma scheme involving Ms. Omietimi's nursing school, Sacred Heart Houston (SHH). An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found no personal fraud by Omietimi but concluded that SHH's program was unapproved and did not provide education substantially equivalent to Texas standards, recommending the denial of her license renewal. The district court affirmed BON's Final Order. BON argues that the decision is supported by substantial evidence and that license renewal is a discretionary act vital for protecting public safety due to Omietimi's inadequate training.

Nursing LicenseLicense RenewalFraudulent Diploma SchemeOperation NightingaleVocational NurseNursing Education StandardsAdministrative LawJudicial ReviewDue ProcessProfessional Licensure
References
26
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Consentino

The claimant, employed at Ford Nursing Home, was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits after voluntarily leaving employment. She initially practiced as a registered professional nurse (RN) under a temporary permit, but failed the licensing examinations. Her employer offered her a licensed practical nurse (LPN) position with substantially the same duties but at a lower hourly wage. The claimant rejected this offer solely due to the reduced pay and resigned. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed the Industrial Commissioner's initial determination that she voluntarily left employment without good cause. The court affirmed the Board's decision, stating that dissatisfaction with a lower pay scale for suitable alternative employment does not constitute 'good cause' under the Labor Law.

Voluntary QuittingGood CauseUnemployment BenefitsWage DisparityLicensureProfessional NurseLicensed Practical NurseLabor Law InterpretationSubstantial EvidenceAdministrative Determination
References
10
Case No. M2017-00629-COA-R3-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 19, 2017

Catherine J. Hollahan v. Tennessee Department of Health

Catherine J. Hollahan, an advanced practice nurse, appealed the Tennessee Board of Nursing's decision to revoke her licenses and assess civil penalties for violating the Nursing Practice Act and related regulations. The violations included practicing without filing a notice and formulary, consuming alcohol while on duty and exhibiting impaired behavior, engaging in a sexual relationship with a patient, unauthorized self-injection of testosterone, and providing incompetent patient care. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial and material evidence supported the Board's findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellate court upheld the revocation of her advanced practice nurse certificate and registered nurse license, as well as the imposed civil penalties. The judgment was affirmed, with a minor modification by the chancery court regarding the description of the patient relationship.

Nursing Practice ActProfessional MisconductLicense RevocationAdvanced Practice NurseAlcohol ImpairmentUnauthorized PrescriptionsPatient RelationshipsStandard of Care ViolationAdministrative LawJudicial Review
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Reitman v. Mills

Petitioner's license to practice as a certified social worker was revoked in 1988 after pleading guilty to sodomy in the second degree. Following probation, he sought restoration of his license, citing rehabilitation efforts. Despite a peer subcommittee's recommendation for restoration, the Committee on the Professions and the Board of Regents recommended denial, a decision upheld by the Commissioner of Education. Petitioner's CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging this denial was dismissed by the Supreme Court. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed, with the court finding no abuse of discretion given the gravity of the offense, the petitioner's admitted ongoing struggles with sexual attraction to adolescent males, and concerns regarding public safety, especially as he intended to operate a private practice from his home.

License RestorationProfessional MisconductSodomyFelony ConvictionRehabilitationPublic SafetyJudicial ReviewAdministrative DiscretionSocial WorkerAppellate Affirmation
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Taylor v. Board of Regents of University

Petitioner, a licensed optometrist in New York since 1981, faced eight specifications of professional misconduct between 1980 and 1985 while employed by American Vision Center. Charges included negligence, gross negligence, practicing beyond authorized scope by administering Neosporin, and unprofessional conduct for delegating responsibilities to unlicensed staff and failing to wear a name tag. A Hearing Panel found petitioner guilty, recommending a license suspension and fine. The Regents Review Committee modified these findings, and the respondent further narrowed the period of charges. Petitioner challenged the determination, alleging denial of due process due to lack of specificity and delay. The Court rejected the due process claims, finding charges specific and no actual prejudice from delay. While the Court found substantial evidence for negligence, unauthorized practice, and unprofessional conduct, it annulled the finding of gross negligence. Despite this annulment, the Court upheld the original penalty, modifying the determination only to reflect the removal of the gross negligence finding, and otherwise confirming the decision.

Optometry license suspensionProfessional misconductUnlicensed practiceDelegation of professional responsibilitiesGross negligenceDue processAdministrative reviewCPLR Article 78Education LawRegents Review Committee
References
11
Case No. 2718 / 02A01-9708-CV-00197
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 16, 1998

Susan Todd/State v. Weakley Co.

Plaintiff Susan K. Todd filed a medical malpractice action against Weakley County and several individual defendants. The trial court dismissed the case against the individual defendants, ruling that certain provisions of the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA) were unconstitutional for vagueness, equal protection violations, and denying the right to a jury trial. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's finding on unconstitutionality, determining that the term "health care practitioner" is not vague and that the provisions do not violate equal protection or the right to a jury trial. The Court affirmed the dismissal of nurse's aides Insco and Jennings, as they are not considered "health care practitioners" under the GTLA, but reversed the dismissal of Nina Snyder and David Bradley, a licensed practical nurse and nursing home administrator respectively.

Medical MalpracticeGovernmental Tort Liability ActConstitutional LawVagueness ChallengeEqual ProtectionRight to Jury TrialHealth Care PractitionerGovernmental ImmunityNurse's AidesLicensed Practical Nurse
References
36
Case No. NO. 01-13-00108-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 23, 2014

Iris Gonzalez v. Diversicare Leasing Corp D/B/A Afton Oaks Nursing Care Center A/K/A Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center Diversicare Afton Oaks, LLC.

Iris Gonzalez, an employee at a nursing home, sued her employer, Afton Oaks, for personal injuries sustained after tripping over crates on an employee pathway. The trial court dismissed her lawsuit for failure to file an expert report under the Texas Medical Liability Act, categorizing it as a health care liability claim. Gonzalez appealed, arguing it was an ordinary negligence claim unrelated to health care. The Court of Appeals, relying on a recent decision in Williams v. Riverside General Hospital, Inc., held that a 'garden-variety slip-and-fall claim that is completely untethered from the provision of health care' does not constitute a health care liability safety claim. Therefore, the appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Slip and FallOrdinary NegligenceTexas Medical Liability ActHealth Care Liability ClaimEmployer LiabilityNursing HomePremises LiabilityWorkers' CompensationExpert ReportAppellate Procedure
References
4
Case No. 02-24-00248-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 13, 2025

Granbury SNF LLC D/B/A Granbury Rehab & Nursing, Advanced HCS LLC D/B/A Advanced Healthcare Solutions, and Granbury Rehab & Nursing GS LLC v. Natalie Jackson

Natalie Jackson sued Granbury SNF LLC, Advanced HCS LLC, and Granbury Rehab & Nursing GS LLC for unlawful retaliation after reporting resident abuse. A jury found in Jackson's favor, awarding compensatory and exemplary damages. On appeal, the Appellants challenged the sufficiency of evidence for Granbury GS's involvement, mental anguish damages, exemplary damages for reprehensible conduct, and the individual capping of punitive damages. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, largely finding that Appellants failed to preserve most issues. Specifically, the court affirmed the exemplary damages against Granbury GS and the award of contingent appellate attorney's fees, citing sufficient evidence of malice and proper calculation methods for fees.

Unlawful RetaliationAbuse ReportingExemplary DamagesMental Anguish DamagesLegal SufficiencyAppellate Attorney's FeesPreservation of ErrorVice-Principal DoctrineTexas Civil Practice and Remedies CodeTexas Health & Safety Code
References
47
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 04, 1988

In re Nurse Care Registry, Inc.

Nurse Care Registry, Inc., an agency providing health care personnel, appealed a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that classified its workers as employees rather than independent contractors, making Nurse Care liable for unemployment insurance contributions. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence of Nurse Care's control over key aspects of the services provided by the workers. This control included client contact, worker wages, and billing/collection, which were deemed indicative of an employer-employee relationship. The court relied on precedent establishing that such control warrants an employment finding, despite workers having full-time positions elsewhere and the agency not directly supervising daily work.

unemployment insuranceemployer-employee relationshipindependent contractoradministrative lawappellate reviewlabor lawagency staffingcontrol testsubstantial evidencehealth care industry
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 2,272 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational