CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ8166052
Regular
Aug 13, 2013

MARIA GARCIA vs. JOSE MARTINEZ ENTERPRISES, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a petition for reconsideration, affirming the dismissal of lien claims for failure to pay activation fees. The lien claimants, Imperial Medical Management and Allied Injury Management, argued they did not receive notice of the lien conference. However, the Board found evidence of proper service via US mail and email, consistent with their designated methods. Presumptions of regular performance of official duty and proper service applied, and a bare assertion of non-receipt was insufficient to overcome proof of service.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLien ConferenceService of NoticePresumption of ServiceNon-ReceiptLien ClaimantLien Activation FeeOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimElectronic Adjudication Management System
References
Case No. ADJ3205611
Regular
Oct 03, 2011

Pedro Valencia vs. TSL, LTD, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a lien claimant, Ventura County Medical Transportation, seeking reconsideration of their lien's dismissal. The lien was dismissed with prejudice by the WCJ for failing to object to a Notice of Intention to Dismiss Lien. The lien claimant argued their representative was attending another hearing and claimed a response was mailed but not received. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding the WCJ correctly followed regulations by dismissing the lien after the claimant failed to appear at the lien trial and subsequently failed to respond to the notice of dismissal.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienLien claimantNotice of Intention to Dismiss LienGood cause objectionLien trialAdministrative law judgeCompromise and releaseAffidavit of lien resolution
References
Case No. ADJ6566169
Regular
Feb 18, 2014

DAMING CAO vs. PRIME WHEEL CORP., PACIFIC COMPENSATION INSURANCE CO.

This case involves a lien claimant whose lien was dismissed for failure to pay an activation fee and appear at a conference. The lien claimant had settled its claim with the defendant the day prior and withdrawn its lien. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal order, and returned the matter for further proceedings. This decision was based in part on a preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of lien activation fee provisions, as well as the lien claimant's timely settlement notification.

Lien Activation FeePetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimLien ConferenceSettlement AgreementLabor Code section 4903.06Angelotti Chiropractic v. BakerPreliminary InjunctionRule 10770Lien Resolution
References
Case No. ADJ7324743
Regular
Sep 13, 2013

DIANA GARCIA vs. USA STAFFING INC., INTERCARE

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for reconsideration of an order dismissing a lien claim. The lien claimant, Dr. Ashden, failed to pay the required lien activation fee before the commencement of the lien conference. The WCAB found this dismissal mandatory under statute and precedent, and ignorance of the law was not a valid excuse. Therefore, the lien was dismissed for failure to comply with the statutory fee requirement.

Lien activation feePetition for ReconsiderationFigueroa en bancCalifornia Code of Regulations title 8 section 10848Lien claimantOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code section 4903.06Lien conferenceCompromise and Release
References
Case No. ADJ2297692 (VNO 0472677)
Regular
Jan 05, 2009

DEATRIZ RODRIGUEZ vs. POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT

The Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an October 22, 2008 order dismissing a lien claim. The lien claimant did not appear at a September 11, 2008 trial and did not provide evidence to support its claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimNotice of Intention to Disallow Lien ClaimMandatory Settlement ConferenceLien TrialBoard Rule 10562Failure to AppearFailure to Submit Evidence
References
Case No. ADJ7562078, ADJ7562289
Regular
Jul 01, 2013

JACK PHILLIP ARBALLO, JR. vs. NATURE'S BEST, TOKIO MARINE TRAVELERS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a joint order dismissing Orthomed LLC's lien claims. The dismissal was based on Orthomed's alleged failure to pay a lien activation fee and appear at a lien conference. However, the Board found that notice of the conference was improperly issued to Orthomed in one case and not at all in another. Consequently, the lien claim in one case was improperly dismissed and is returned for further proceedings, while the lien claim in the other case may still be dismissed if the fee was indeed not paid.

Lien activation feeLabor Code section 4903.06Joint Order Dismissing LienCompromise and Releaselien claimantNotice and Request for Allowance of LienDeclaration of Readiness to Proceedlien conferenceElectronic Adjudication Management SystemMinutes of Hearing
References
Case No. ADJ6867785
Regular
May 08, 2012

GERARDO LUA vs. BALDWIN PARK CAR WASH, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in four sentences: Defendant Baldwin Park Car Wash and State Farm Insurance sought removal, arguing the Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction due to a prior dismissal of the claim. The Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning that defendant retained all rights to defend lien claims. The Board explicitly stated it expressed no opinion on the merits of the outstanding lien issues. The order signifies that the case will proceed to lien trial as scheduled.

Petition for RemovalAppeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeJurisdictionApplication for Adjudication of ClaimLien ClaimsLien TrialRescind OrderContinued MatterDefendant's Petition
References
Case No. ADJ2178733 (BAK 0154115)
Regular
May 27, 2014

LIDIA BUENO vs. RAVILA FARM LABOR SERVICES, REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a lien claimant, Biocare RX Specialty Pharmacy, whose lien was dismissed by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). Biocare argued the dismissal was erroneous because it had not yet filed a lien. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinding the dismissal order. The Board found it lacked jurisdiction to dismiss a lien that had not been filed and that Biocare was improperly dismissed for non-appearance at a lien conference for which it received no notice.

Lien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationOrder to Dismiss LiensWCJBiocare RX Specialty PharmacyElite Lien Servicesjurisdictionfiled lienLabor Code section 4903.5industrial injury
References
Showing 1-10 of 7,770 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational