CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ426447 (RDG 0129495)
Regular
Jul 16, 2010

Shane Guest vs. Barrett Business Services

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as he was not aggrieved by a final order. The applicant sought to set aside a settlement concerning the Employment Development Department's (EDD) lien, arguing it was made in error. However, the Board found that the WCJ had not yet made a final determination on the EDD lien, which is a prerequisite for the Board to have jurisdiction to approve or disapprove such a settlement. Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial level for a final determination of the EDD's lien.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalEDD LienTrial LevelFinal DeterminationTemporary DisabilityEmployment Development DepartmentStipulationDeferred Lien
References
1
Case No. ADJ6981750
Regular
Jan 13, 2017

GUMERSINDO DELEON vs. ESPARZA ENTERPRISES, INC.

This case concerns a lien claimant's failure to pay a $100.00 lien activation fee required by Labor Code section 4903.06 by the date of a lien conference. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is considering rescinding the order dismissing the lien, but only if the fee is paid within ten days of this notice. The WCAB's intention is based on a court order allowing lien activation fees to be paid between November 9, 2015, and December 31, 2015, and the lien claimant's assertion of computer problems. If payment is received, the lien claim will be returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Lien activation feeLabor Code Section 4903.06ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimWCJDWCAngelotti Chiropractic v. BakerPreliminary injunctionNinth CircuitVacating injunction
References
7
Case No. ADJ8 156794
Regular
Jan 12, 2017

NURY PEREZ vs. BLUE RIVER DENIM, THE HARTFORD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is considering rescinding an order that dismissed a lien claim due to a failure to pay a $100 lien activation fee. The lien claimant, Premier Psychological Services (PPS), claims computer issues prevented timely payment. While the WCJ recommended denial of reconsideration, the WCAB may rescind the dismissal if PPS pays the activation fee within ten days of this notice. If paid, the lien claim will be returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Lien activation feeLabor Code section 4903.06WCABadministrative law judgereconsiderationrescissiondismissallien conferenceCompromise and Releaseindustrial injury
References
1
Case No. ADJ6690599
Regular
Jul 05, 2013

MARIA MORENO vs. KELLY SERVICES, INC.; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Defendant Kelly Services' petition for reconsideration, reversing the trial judge's decision to admit certain lien claimant exhibits and award payment. The Board found that lien claimant Foundation Medical Group (FMG) failed to comply with Labor Code section 4903.8(d) by not submitting required declarations for its billing records. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding FMG's lien. Additionally, the Board dismissed lien claimant Express Case Management's petition for reconsideration as untimely.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code section 4903.8(d)Declaration under penalty of perjuryIndustrial injuryLow back injuryCompromise and ReleaseLien trialMedical bills
References
0
Case No. ADJ7016910, ADJ7016880
Regular
Jan 25, 2017

DENNIS LEBER vs. HOWARDS APPLIANCES, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

This case involves a lien dismissal for non-payment of a $100 activation fee. The lien claimant argues they had until December 31, 2015, to pay based on a federal court order and a DWC Newsline. The Appeals Board intends to rescind the dismissal if the fee is paid within ten days, based on the interpretation that the federal court order allowed payment between November 9 and December 31, 2015. If the fee is paid, the lien claim will proceed to the trial level.

Lien activation feeLabor Code § 4903.06Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimDWC NewslineU.S. District CourtPreliminary injunctionAngelotti Chiropractic v. BakerDIR Newsline
References
1
Case No. ADJ7271033
Regular
Jan 25, 2017

JENNIFER LAWSON vs. GLEN IVY DAY SPA, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is considering rescinding an order that dismissed lien claimant Proex Diagnostics' lien for failure to pay a \$100 activation fee. Proex argues they had until December 31, 2015, to pay the fee based on a federal court order and DWC guidance. The WCAB's notice indicates they intend to rescind the dismissal if the fee is paid within ten days of the notice. If rescinded, the lien claim will return to the trial level for further proceedings.

Proex DiagnosticsGlen Ivy Day SpaCompWest Insurance CompanyBerkshire Hathaway Homestate CompaniesLien Activation FeeLabor Code Section 4903.06Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJReconsiderationCompromise and Release
References
1
Case No. ADJ8089263
Regular
Oct 28, 2015

ANGELICA LEGASPI vs. UNO PRODUCE MARKET, STAR INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversing the trial judge's decision that disallowed lien claimant Preferred Scan's (PS) claim. The Board found PS was exempt from registration as a professional photocopier because it acted as an agent or independent contractor for applicant's attorney, a member of the State Bar, as permitted by Business and Professions Code section 22451(b). The WCAB emphasized that the statute's plain language does not require the agent or contractor to forgo profit for the exemption to apply. The case was returned to the trial level for a new decision on the compensability of the lien.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPreferred ScanBusiness and Professions Code section 22451(b)Business and Professions Code section 22450registered professional photocopierState Bar memberagentindependent contractorWCJ
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 27, 1984

Stedman v. City of New York

This case concerns an appeal regarding a workers' compensation lien. The plaintiff, a cab driver, was injured in an automobile accident and received workers' compensation benefits from the State Insurance Fund and no-fault benefits from Eagle Insurance Co. Plaintiff settled a personal injury action against Walther and the City of New York for $30,000, with Welsbach and Alfo Cab Co. as third-party defendants. The trial court initially granted a motion to vacate the workers' compensation lien but later reversed this decision. The appellate court unanimously reversed the vacatur, denied the motion to vacate the lien, and reinstated the lien, holding that the Fund's lien attaches to recoveries from non-covered persons (City of New York and Welsbach) for both economic and non-economic loss under Insurance Law § 673, subd 2.

Workers' Compensation LienNo-Fault BenefitsAutomobile AccidentThird-Party ActionSubrogationInsurance LawEconomic LossNoneconomic LossSettlement ProceedsStatutory Interpretation
References
2
Case No. ADJ3016059 (SFO 0479940)
Regular
May 13, 2014

SCOTT SATTLER vs. STAR HR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, vacating a scheduled lien trial. The defendant argued the trial judge lacked authority to set a hearing for a lien previously dismissed with prejudice for failure to timely pay the activation fee. The Board agreed that proceeding with the trial would cause irreparable harm, as the lien was already finalized and dismissed before a federal injunction affected lien activation fee collection. Therefore, the lien trial was ordered vacated.

Petition for RemovalLien TrialDismissed with PrejudiceLien Activation FeeIrreparable HarmFinal OrderLabor Code section 4903.06Angelotti Chiropractic v. BakerWCJ AuthorityStanding
References
2
Case No. ADJ3193987 (RIV 0037219)
Regular
Feb 26, 2009

DOUGLAS CRAWFORD vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

This case involves a lien claimant, Forensic Psychiatric Services, whose lien was initially slated for disallowance due to an unprepared representative at a conference. The lien claimant petitioned for the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) disqualification, alleging bias and an unwarranted opinion. The Appeals Board denied the disqualification petition, finding insufficient grounds. However, they granted the lien claimant's objection to the disallowance notice, rescinded it, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardForensic Psychiatric ServicesPetition for DisqualificationNotice of Intention to Disallow Lien ClaimWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeunprepared lien representativeunqualified opinionevinced enmityWCAB Rule 10452objection to NOI
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 7,632 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational