CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ10798774 (Master File); ADJ10798775
Regular
Jul 21, 2025

WILLK MARILAO vs. CITY OF SHAFTER

Applicant Willk Marilao sought reconsideration of a Joint Findings of Fact and Award (F&A) concerning industrial injuries to his upper and lower extremities. The F&A found 64% permanent partial disability for upper extremities and 23% for lower extremities. Applicant contended that he was 100% permanently and totally disabled and that apportionment was improper. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition, rescinded the F&A, and returned the matter for further proceedings, finding the original findings of specific injuries unsupported by substantial medical evidence, and medical opinions on apportionment to be speculative.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings of Fact and AwardIndustrial InjuryBilateral Upper ExtremitiesCarpal Tunnel SyndromePermanent Partial DisabilityApportionmentVocational ExpertPermanently and Totally Disabled
References
27
Case No. 2021 NY Slip Op 01018 [191 AD3d 548]
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 16, 2021

Matter of Tenants United Fighting for the Lower E. Side v. City of New York Dept. of City Planning

The Appellate Division reversed a lower court order that had annulled approvals by the New York City Planning Commission (CPC) for new building constructions. The Supreme Court had initially granted petitions from Tenants United Fighting for the Lower East Side and Lower East Side Organized Neighbors. The appellate court held that the Supreme Court should have deferred to the CPC's reasonable interpretation of the New York City Zoning Resolution (ZR). Specifically, the Appellate Division clarified that ZR § 78-043's requirement for findings as a condition precedent only applies to modifications granted by special permit or authorization, not to other types of modifications to large-scale residential developments. Consequently, the petitions were denied and the proceedings dismissed.

Zoning ResolutionLarge-Scale Residential DevelopmentCity Planning CommissionAdministrative LawAppellate ReviewJudicial DeferenceStatutory InterpretationArticle 78 ProceedingNYC ZoningUrban Planning
References
7
Case No. ADJ2804761 (LAO0886335)
Regular
Jun 13, 2014

RUBEN PEREZ ARAUJO vs. CENTIMARK CORPORATION, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, BROADSPIRE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the defendant's contentions regarding the applicant's Petition to Reopen. The Board found no good cause to reopen the claim for new and further disability related to the applicant's left upper extremity, left lower extremity, insomnia, urological, or internal conditions. This decision was based on the applicant's failure to present substantial evidence of new and further disability beyond what was previously adjudicated or known at the time of the initial award. However, the Board noted that the employer's liability for medical treatment for these conditions may still exist, irrespective of disability findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition to ReopenNew and Further DisabilityGood CauseLabor Code Section 5410Agreed Medical ExaminerFindings and AwardInsomniaUrological IssuesInternal Systems
References
3
Case No. ADJ7073718
Regular
Mar 08, 2016

RECARD ON GONZALES vs. PHILIP SERVICES CORPORATION, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a typographical error in a prior award. The original decision found the applicant sustained an industrial injury to his right lower extremity, resulting in temporary disability and a 55% permanent disability rating after apportionment. The employer sought reconsideration, arguing for a lower rating based on a QME's opinion attributing 90% of the disability to non-industrial factors. The WCJ recommended amending the award to remove the erroneous reference to the QME's 90% apportionment and to simply state that 45% of the impairment existed prior to the industrial injury. The Board affirmed the substance of the original decision but amended Finding No. 10 as recommended.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDRECONSIDERATION GRANTEDDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATIONTRUCK DRIVERINDUSTRIAL INJURYRIGHT LOWER EXTREMITYTEMPORARY DISABILITYPERMANENT DISABILITYAPPORTIONMENTLABOR CODE SECTION 4663
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Truly v. Regan

Petitioner, employed by Brooklyn Developmental Center, sustained a lower back and left leg injury in January 1986. After a period of inactivity, she stopped working in March 1987 due to her injuries and began receiving workers' compensation benefits. In February 1988, her applications for ordinary disability retirement benefits (under Retirement and Social Security Law art 14) and article 15 disability retirement benefits (under art 15) were denied by the respondent. The ordinary disability application was denied because she was not 'in service' at the time of filing, having been terminated in May 1987. The article 15 disability application was deemed untimely, as it was filed in February 1988, beyond the three-month window from her last payroll date of March 27, 1987, and she lacked approved medical leave. The court confirmed the denial and dismissed her petition.

Disability RetirementOrdinary Disability BenefitsArticle 15 Disability BenefitsIn Service RequirementTimely FilingCPLR Article 78 ProceedingEmployment TerminationMedical LeaveNew York State Employees' Retirement SystemAlbany County
References
5
Case No. ADJ9785796
Regular
Oct 14, 2019

Victor Gonzalez vs. CITY OF TORRANCE

This case involves applicant Victor Gonzalez's petition for reconsideration of a WCJ's decision finding industrial injury to his back and left lower extremity, but not his psyche or in the form of stroke. The Board granted reconsideration, finding that the neurological evaluator applied an incorrect legal standard to the stroke claim and that Dr. Silver's deposition testimony was improperly excluded. Consequently, the Board amended the decision to preserve the findings of injury to the back and left lower extremity and denied injury to the psyche, while deferring the stroke and permanent disability issues for further development of the record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardVictor GonzalezCity of Torrancebus operatorindustrial injuryback injuryleft lower extremitystrokepsycheDr. Lee Silver
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 11, 1996

Claim of Saunders v. Pepsi Cola

On December 28, 1989, the claimant sustained a lower back injury while working, leading to two surgeries and workers' compensation benefits. X-rays revealed a pre-existing condition of spondylolisthesis. The employer's workers' compensation carrier sought to impose liability on the Special Disability Fund under Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (8) (d). The Workers' Compensation Board concluded that the claimant's disability was solely caused by the 1989 accident and discharged the Special Disability Fund. The Appellate Division affirmed this decision, finding substantial evidence that the spondylolisthesis was asymptomatic and did not contribute to the subsequent disability.

Workers' CompensationSpecial Disability FundSpondylolisthesisPre-existing ConditionPermanent Partial DisabilityAsymptomaticApportionmentMedical EvidenceLiabilityWorkers' Compensation Board
References
3
Case No. ADJ528016 (LAO 0797447) ADJ4708211 (LAO 0831457)
Regular
May 04, 2015

JORGE PAREDES vs. COASTCAST CORPORATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY/CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, SEDGWICK CLAIMS M

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant claiming industrial injury to his psyche, lower extremities, internal system, high blood pressure, and diabetes over a cumulative trauma period. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found injury to the psyche and lower extremities, but not the internal system or conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes. The ALJ also found Republic Indemnity solely liable, with a specific date of injury. Both applicant and Republic sought reconsideration. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, amending the findings to include chronic venous stasis and need for further medical treatment, but deferred key issues like the date of injury, liability, permanent disability, and attorney fees. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderLabor Code Section 5412Date of InjuryCumulative TraumaRepublic Indemnity CompanyCalifornia Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA)Agreed Medical Examiner (AME)Chronic Venous Stasis
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of Paez v. Lackman Culinary Services

Claimant, an immigrant, injured his lower back while working as a food service worker in 2010. His workers' compensation claim was established, leading to surgery in 2012 for a herniated disc. Despite surgery, he continued to experience pain and was unable to return to his job. A WCLJ determined he had a permanent partial disability and an 80% loss of wage-earning capacity, which was affirmed by the Workers' Compensation Board. Claimant appealed, arguing the Board failed to consider total industrial disability, an issue he had raised before the WCLJ. The appellate court found that the Board did err by not addressing the total industrial disability claim and remitted the matter for further proceedings, as total industrial disability can have a more favorable outcome than loss of wage-earning capacity.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWage-Earning CapacityTotal Industrial DisabilityLumbar DiscectomyLaminectomyMedical ExaminationRemittalAppellate ReviewBack InjuryFood Service Worker
References
4
Case No. ADJ2522693 (POM 0260474)
Regular
Apr 17, 2019

MALCOLM CHISUM vs. BROWN INTERNATIONAL, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

The applicant sustained a lumbar spine and bilateral lower extremities injury on October 4, 2001, for which he received a stipulated settlement. Subsequently, the applicant sought additional temporary disability indemnity, arguing his temporary disability commenced within five years of the injury and has been continuous. However, a prior order found the applicant permanent and stationary on February 23, 2015, which remains a binding final order. Therefore, the Board affirmed the prior finding, determining it lacks jurisdiction to award further temporary disability benefits as the applicant cannot establish continuous temporary disability post-February 23, 2015.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and OrderTemporary Total DisabilityLumbar SpineBilateral Lower ExtremitiesSheet Metal FabricatorJurisdictionLabor Code Section 4656(b)Petition to Reopen
References
10
Showing 1-10 of 8,347 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational