CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Double Green Produce, Inc. v. Forum Supermarket Inc.

Plaintiff Double Green Produce, Inc. sued Defendants Forum Supermarket Inc. and Hong Wen Cai for failure to pay for wholesale produce under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) and other claims. After Defendants defaulted, Plaintiff moved for default judgment. Although initially recommended for denial due to jurisdictional concerns, the Court allowed Plaintiff to submit additional information. Upon review, the Court found Forum to be a PACA 'dealer' and that Plaintiff had preserved its trust rights. The Court determined Defendants' default was willful and that Defendant Cai was personally liable for dissipating trust assets. Consequently, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding $23,080.75 in damages, $5579.82 in prejudgment interest, and $4074.25 in attorneys' fees, totaling $32,734.82.

PACAPerishable Agricultural CommoditiesDefault JudgmentBreach of ContractStatutory TrustFiduciary DutyInterstate CommerceWholesale ProduceDamages AwardPrejudgment Interest
References
49
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Evolution Online Systems, Inc. v. Koninklijke Nederland N.V.

This case, on remand from the Second Circuit, involves claims of breach of contract, copyright infringement, and quantum meruit. The Court had previously dismissed the complaint, citing a forum-selection clause mandating litigation in the Netherlands. The Second Circuit remanded to clarify whether a contract with such a clause existed and if it should be enforced, or if dismissal was appropriate on forum non conveniens grounds. The District Court affirmed that a binding contract with a mandatory Netherlands forum-selection clause existed and should be enforced due to significant partial performance and mutual intent to be bound, despite the lack of a signed document. The court also determined that even without the clause, the case would be dismissed on grounds of forum non conveniens, as the Netherlands offers an adequate alternative forum and is more convenient based on public and private interest factors, including the location of proof and the applicability of Dutch law.

Contract disputeCopyright infringementQuantum meruitForum-selection clauseForum non conveniensInternational litigationDutch lawNew York lawSecond Circuit remandBreach of contract
References
21
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In Re the Complaint of American President Lines, Ltd.

This case involves two related limitation proceedings (the "APL Action" and the "Hanjin Action") arising from a vessel collision in Korean waters between the President Washington (owned by American President Lines, Ltd. - APL) and the Hanjin Hong Kong (chartered by Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd. and owned by Highlight Navigation Corporation). The U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, presided by Judge SWEET, addressed motions concerning forum non conveniens, transfer of venue, and choice of law. The Court granted APL's motions for summary judgment, dismissing Hanjin's affirmative defenses regarding forum non conveniens and venue transfer in the APL Action, and striking (with leave to replead) Hanjin's defense concerning Korean law. Concurrently, the Court denied Hanjin's motion to dismiss the Hanjin Action on forum non conveniens grounds, concluding that the balance of private and public interest factors did not strongly favor dismissal to a foreign forum or transfer to the Western District of Washington.

Admiralty LawMaritime LawVessel CollisionLimitation of LiabilityForum Non ConveniensTransfer of VenueChoice of LawCargo ClaimsInternational ShippingKorean Law
References
32
Case No. ADJ7045808
Regular
Jan 22, 2014

Ernest Conwell vs. New Orleans Saints, Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp.

This case involves a professional athlete claiming industrial injury sustained between 1996 and 2007. The defendant contested California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) jurisdiction due to a forum selection clause in the employment contract designating Louisiana as the exclusive forum. The WCAB rescinded the initial award and remanded the case for further development of the record. This is to allow reconsideration of the *McKinley* decision regarding mandatory forum selection clauses and the connection to California, particularly concerning contract formation.

WCABjurisdictionforum selection clauseemployment contractprofessional athleteindustrial injurypermanent disabilityapportionmentcontract of hireagent
References
16
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 19, 2007

Kuwaiti Engineering Group v. Consortium of International Consultants, LLC

The case involved a Kuwaiti corporation, as plaintiff, seeking to enforce a contract and alleging tortious interference with its contract rights against defendants Safege Consulting Engineers (French) and Consortium of International Consultants, LLC (Delaware). The Supreme Court, New York County, granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on forum non conveniens grounds. The court found New York an inconvenient forum because the consulting work was primarily performed in Kuwait, negotiations were only partly in New York, and the alleged interference occurred outside New York. The decision was conditioned upon the defendants' consent to jurisdiction in Kuwait and France. The court affirmed the dismissal but denied Safege's request for sanctions, deeming the plaintiff's appeal not frivolous.

forum non conveniensKuwaitFrancecontract disputetortious interferenceinternational lawjurisdictiondismissalappellate courtNew York Supreme Court
References
6
Case No. ADJ7460656
En Banc
Jan 15, 2013

DENNIS MCKINLEY vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, declining to exercise jurisdiction over a cumulative injury claim due to a reasonable mandatory forum selection clause in the employment contract specifying Arizona as the forum, coupled with the applicant's limited connection to California.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDEN BANCCUMULATIVE INJURYPROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL PLAYERARIZONA CARDINALSTRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANYFORUM SELECTION CLAUSEMANDATORY FORUMLIMITED CONNECTIONEMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
References
61
Case No. ADJ7460656
Significant
Jan 15, 2013

Dennis McKinley vs. Arizona Cardinals, The Travelers Indemnity Company

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, holding that it will decline to exercise jurisdiction over a cumulative injury claim when a reasonable mandatory forum selection clause in an employment contract specifies another state's forum, and the employee's connection to California is limited.

En banc decisionForum selection clauseCumulative injuryProfessional football playerArizona CardinalsLimited connection to CaliforniaEmployment contractIndustrial Commission of ArizonaPublic policyUnreasonable forum
References
60
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 27, 2006

Smolik v. Turner Construction Co.

The plaintiff, a Kings County resident, sustained injuries at a New Jersey construction site while working for a New Jersey employer. Following initial treatment and a New Jersey workers' compensation claim, the plaintiff initiated a personal injury action in New York against Turner Construction Company and Metrovest Equities, Inc., both New York corporations with operations in New Jersey. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis of forum non conveniens, arguing New York was an inconvenient forum. The Supreme Court, Kings County, granted these motions, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal, finding no improvident exercise of discretion given the lack of substantial nexus to New York.

Personal InjuryForum Non ConveniensDismissalAppealNew York CourtsNew Jersey SitusJurisdictionCPLR 327DamagesConstruction Site
References
9
Case No. ADJ7593509
Regular
Apr 08, 2013

ELLIS WYMS vs. TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS, ACE/PACIFIC EMPLOYERS

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a workers' compensation award, rescinding the prior decision and returning the case for further proceedings. This action was based on the defendant's contention that a mandatory forum selection clause in the applicant's employment contracts required claims to be filed in Florida. The Appeals Board cited its en banc decision in *McKinley v. Arizona Cardinals*, which established that the central issue is whether California should enforce such a clause, not merely whether it has jurisdiction. Upon remand, both parties will have the opportunity to present evidence and arguments regarding the enforceability of the forum selection clause.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFinding and AwardFootball PlayerForum Selection ClauseMcKinley v. Arizona CardinalsEn Banc DecisionCumulative Industrial InjuryEmployment ContractsMandatory Forum Selection
References
8
Case No. ADJ7672393
Regular
Mar 07, 2013

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE

This case concerns Maurice Williams, a former professional football player for the Jacksonville Jaguars, who sought workers' compensation benefits in California for a cumulative injury sustained between 2001 and 2009. While a portion of his employment exposed him to California, his contracts from 2007-2011 contained a mandatory forum selection clause requiring all injury claims to be resolved in Florida under Florida law. The Board affirmed the trial judge's decision to decline jurisdiction, finding the forum selection clause to be reasonable and binding for the latter portion of the cumulative injury period. Enforcement of the clause was not deemed unreasonable or unjust, and the applicant failed to demonstrate why California jurisdiction should be exercised despite the contractual agreement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJacksonville JaguarsUSF&GACE INSURANCEOpinion and Decision After Reconsiderationindustrial injuryorthopedic body partscumulative injurysubject matter jurisdictionforum selection clause
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 765 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational