CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8564064, ADJ8564068
Regular
Dec 18, 2014

MARIA RAMIREZ vs. PRIORITY BUSINESS SERVICES, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves applicant Maria Ramirez's petition for removal, seeking to undo a notation on a Minute Order from a Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC). Ramirez alleged irreparable harm from an order compelling her to attend a Qualified Medical Evaluation (QME) despite an agreement to use an Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME). The Board denied the petition, finding no evidence that the WCJ ordered a PQME or that Ramirez requested an AME examination with the proposed evaluator. The WCJ correctly took the cases off calendar due to the defendant's timely objection to Ramirez's Declaration of Readiness to Proceed, which relied on a deceased AME's report.

Petition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedAgreed Medical EvaluatorQualified Medical EvaluatorOff CalendarIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceWCJ OrderMinutes of Hearing
References
2
Case No. ADJ19527341
Regular
May 05, 2025

MARIA RAMIREZ vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA

Applicant Maria Ramirez sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation administrative law judge's order, which found no industrial injury. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board determined that the WCJ's credibility finding, based on the delayed worsening of symptoms, required expert medical opinion to ascertain consistency with the claimed injury mechanism, thus necessitating further development of the medical and factual record.

ADJ19527341Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryRight Arm InjuryRight Wrist InjuryRight Hip InjuryRight Leg InjuryRight Foot InjuryWCJ Credibility Determination
References
9
Case No. 2024 NY Slip Op 04334 [230 AD3d 811]
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 28, 2024

Ramirez v. Pace Univ.

The plaintiff, Jonathan Ramirez, suffered personal injuries after falling from a scaffold during a construction project at Pace University, which had contracted with NYCAN Builders, LLC to manage the project. Ramirez sued both Pace University and NYCAN Builders, LLC, alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). The Supreme Court granted Ramirez's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of an elevation-related hazard and proximate cause, and the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact or demonstrate that the motion was premature. The court also held NYCAN Builders, LLC liable as a statutory agent under Labor Law § 240 (1).

Personal InjuryScaffold AccidentConstruction SiteLabor Law ViolationSummary Judgment MotionAppellate DivisionElevation-Related HazardProximate CauseStatutory Agent LiabilityNondelegable Duty
References
12
Case No. ADJ8508466
Regular
Nov 05, 2013

ROBERTO RAMIREZ (Deceased); MARIA GUADALUPE DIAZ de RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for MARIA LINA RAMIREZ DIAZ, vs. VISTA PAINT CORPORATION, Permissibly Self-Insured,

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision grants reconsideration and returns the case to the trial level for further proceedings. While the WCJ correctly found the daughter was partially dependent, the Board noted an incomplete record regarding the wife's dependency status and potential eligibility under Labor Code section 3501(b). The Board also found the issue of attorney fees was not decided. Consequently, the matter is remanded for determination of the wife's dependency, the correct death benefit amount, and attorney fees, or for clarification on why these issues were not previously addressed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRoberto RamirezMaria Guadalupe Diaz de RamirezMaria Lina Ramirez DiazVista Paint CorporationLabor Code section 3501(a)Labor Code section 3501(b)conclusive presumptiondependencypartial dependent
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Ramirez v. Rifkin

Plaintiff Reina Ramirez brought an action against Terry and Leah Rifkin alleging failure to pay wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York State Labor Law (NYLL). Defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the claims were time-barred and that plaintiff did not perform overtime work. The court denied summary judgment on the FLSA overtime claims and state law claims, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding the statute of limitations, willfulness, and equitable tolling, as well as the amount of time plaintiff worked. However, the court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on federal and state minimum wage claims from mid-2003 to December 8, 2005, based on the plaintiff's concession.

Fair Labor Standards ActNew York State Labor LawSummary JudgmentStatute of LimitationsEquitable TollingOvertime PayMinimum WageDomestic WorkerEmployment LawRecord Keeping
References
43
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Maria A.

This case involves an appeal from an order of disposition by the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 19, 1979, which found appellant Maria to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her with the Division for Youth, Title III, for 18 months. Maria argued that her placement was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence and that less coercive alternatives were not considered. The delinquency finding stemmed from Maria's admission to acts constituting second-degree robbery and second-degree manslaughter. At the dispositional hearing, conflicting expert opinions were presented regarding the appropriate placement, with court-appointed experts favoring a more secure facility due to concerns about Maria's impulse control, while appellant's experts suggested an open residential setting. The appellate court affirmed the order, finding no basis for reversal after balancing the child's needs and community protection.

Juvenile DelinquencyFamily CourtOrder of DispositionPlacementDivision for YouthRobberyManslaughterPreponderance of EvidenceDispositional HearingResidential Facility
References
1
Case No. ADJ1220602 (SJO 0264607)
Regular
Sep 08, 2009

MARIA ISABEL RAMIREZ vs. QUIZNOS, STATE FARM 21567 BAKERSFIELD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the defendant's challenge to a $\$1,570$ lien for interpreting services. While agreeing interpreters are reasonably required for non-English speaking injured workers, the Board found Ditto Interpreting failed to adequately prove the reasonableness of its fees. Specifically, Ditto billed for dates not coinciding with medical evaluations and provided insufficient evidence of the reasonableness of its charges compared to other cases. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings on these issues.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardQUIZNOSSTATE FARMMARIA ISABEL RAMIREZDitto InterpretingLien ClaimReconsiderationFindings and AwardStipulated AwardCompromise & Release
References
1
Case No. 2023 NY Slip Op 00901
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 16, 2023

Matter of Ramirez v. Echevarria

Sarah Ramirez, on behalf of Garrison Echevarria, appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision that ruled Keamesha Echevarria was entitled to death benefits as the surviving spouse of the deceased Gregory Echevarria. The appeal also challenged the denial of an application for reconsideration by the decedent's fiancée. The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the Board's finding that Keamesha Echevarria had not abandoned the decedent, thus qualifying her as a legal spouse for workers' compensation death benefits. The Court found substantial evidence supported the Board's conclusion, as the elements required to establish abandonment were not met. Additionally, the Court upheld the denial of the reconsideration application, finding no abuse of discretion.

Workers' Compensation BenefitsSurviving SpouseDeath BenefitsAbandonmentDomestic Relations LawAppellate ReviewBoard Decision AffirmationReconsideration ApplicationCredibility DeterminationSubstantial Evidence
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

DeLeon v. Ramirez

Plaintiffs, migrant workers, sued G & G Produce Dealers, Inc. and Stanley Gurda for violating the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act (FLCRA) by engaging Modesto Ramirez as an unregistered farm labor contractor in 1976. The defendants failed to ensure Ramirez possessed a valid certificate of registration, as required by law. The court found that Ramirez's activities, including recruiting, soliciting, hiring, furnishing, and transporting migrant workers for a fee, clearly established him as a farm labor contractor under the Act. Despite defendants' claims, evidence showed they engaged and ratified Ramirez's services, including co-signing his application and deducting transportation costs from workers' wages. The court granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs, holding G & G Produce and Gurda jointly and severally liable for an intentional violation of the FLCRA and awarding liquidated damages of $500 to each of the 13 plaintiffs, totaling $6,500.

Farm Labor Contractor Registration ActFLCRAMigrant WorkersSummary JudgmentUnregistered ContractorLiquidated DamagesJoint and Several LiabilityEmployer ResponsibilityWorker TransportationRecruitment
References
15
Case No. 2019 NY Slip Op 00021
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 03, 2019

Ramirez v. Elias-Tejada

This consolidated appeal arises from a three-car collision on December 12, 2011, involving a stalled car carrying Fairway employees that was struck by two other vehicles. Plaintiffs, including Pilar Ramirez, Yedmy Batista Peralta, and Delio Polanco (on behalf of his deceased wife), sought damages. Key issues involved the application of the relation back doctrine to add Fairway entities as defendants, the assertion of a Workers' Compensation Law defense, and motions for summary judgment regarding negligence and serious injury. The Appellate Division reviewed several Supreme Court orders, resulting in a mixed decision that reversed in part, affirmed in part, modified in part, and granted in part.

Car accidentThree-car collisionRespondeat superiorWorkers' Compensation LawRelation back doctrineSummary judgmentVicarious liabilityStatute of limitationsPleading errorAmended complaint
References
11
Showing 1-10 of 766 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational