CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

State v. International Fidelity Insurance

The State (plaintiff) sought summary judgment against International Fidelity Insurance Company (IFIC) (defendant) to recover on surety bonds issued for Golden Distributors, LTD, after Golden's checks for cigarette tax stamps were dishonored. IFIC claimed the bonds were terminated via certified mail in 1989, but the Department of Taxation and Finance denied receipt. The court ruled that IFIC's failure to produce certified mail return receipts or white slips was fatal to their claim of "presumption of receipt" and that their office procedures were insufficient to establish proper mailing. Furthermore, the State's destruction of mail logs, done routinely, did not constitute spoliation as IFIC had not shown the logs were relevant to foreseeable litigation at the time of destruction. Consequently, the State's motion for summary judgment was granted, and IFIC's cross-motion was denied.

Summary JudgmentSpoliation of EvidenceCertified MailPresumption of ReceiptBond CancellationTax LawInsurance LawOffice ProceduresBurden of ProofEvidence Destruction
References
14
Case No. ADJ11535411
Regular
Jul 19, 2019

TERRI HARRISON vs. CITY OF TORRANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, overturning a prior ruling that presumed the applicant's injury compensable due to a late denial. The Board found that the defendant's denial letter, mailed on December 26, 2018, was timely because the 90-day presumption period expired on December 25, 2018, a court holiday, making the next business day the deadline. The employer's inability to definitively prove the claim form's receipt date led the Board to infer a receipt date of September 26, 2018, thus making the December 26 denial compliant with Labor Code section 5402. Consequently, the applicant's injury is not presumed compensable.

Labor Code section 5402presumption of compensabilitytimely denialclaim form filing dateCode of Civil Procedure section 1013WCAB Rule 10507(a)court holidaybusiness day extensionPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Order
References
2
Case No. ADJ7270261
Regular
Mar 01, 2012

MEKAL FARUKI vs. MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORES

This case involves Mekal Faruki's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board dismissed the petition as untimely. Labor Code section 5903 establishes a strict 20-day deadline for filing reconsideration petitions, with a possible 5-day extension for mailing. Critically, the petition is considered filed upon receipt, not mailing date. Faruki's petition was filed over 25 days after the December 10, 2010 decision, rendering it jurisdictionally barred.

Mekal FarukiMacy's Department StoresPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingLabor Code Section 5903WCAB Rule 10507Jurisdictional Time LimitDismissalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardSacramento District Office
References
6
Case No. ADJ9148328
Regular
Mar 13, 2017

PERCY NOEL vs. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, MATRIX ROCKLIN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Percy Noel's Petitions for Removal. The WCAB found the petitions were untimely filed, exceeding the 25-day deadline for removal petitions from a non-final decision served by mail. Proof of mailing was insufficient, and the WCAB requires actual receipt within the time limit. Even if timely, the WCAB would have denied the petitions on their merits, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Petition for RemovalUntimely FilingWCABWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeService by MailFiling DeadlineNon-final DecisionWCJ ReportDismissalCalifornia Code of Regulations
References
3
Case No. ADJ1510738
Regular
Oct 10, 2008

XXZZX SJO2 vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIF) petition for reconsideration as untimely. The petition was filed on August 11, 2008, which was beyond the 25-day jurisdictional deadline for reconsideration after service by mail on July 14, 2008. The WCAB emphasized that filing is determined by the date of receipt, not mailing, and the petition was received by the San Jose district office three days after the deadline.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundPetition for ReconsiderationTimelinessJurisdictionalFiling DateReceipt DateOfficial Address RecordProof of ServiceDismissedWCAB
References
8
Case No. ADJ8541107
Regular
Sep 24, 2018

CHARLES PARAMORE III vs. MACY'S WEST STORES, SEDGWICK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. California law requires petitions for reconsideration to be received by the WCAB within 25 days of service by mail, with extensions for weekends or holidays, and timely receipt, not just mailing, is crucial. In this case, the petition was filed on July 23, 2018, well after the July 3, 2018 deadline. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition's merits.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingDismissalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor CodeCalifornia Code of RegulationsJurisdictional Time LimitService by MailWCJ ReportFirst Amended Findings
References
4
Case No. ADJ1213058 (LAO 0885852) ADJ1763266 (LAO 0885853) ADJ1157326 (VNO 0375246) ADJ1487880 (VNO 0376987) ADJ1490458 (VNO 0375242)
Regular
Jul 05, 2017

SHERYLLIN WHITE vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Sheryllin White's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The applicant sought review of a prior decision awarding benefits for work-related injuries sustained in 1998. Her petition was filed more than 25 days after the original decision was served by mail, violating the jurisdictional filing deadline. The Board emphasized that filing means actual receipt by the Appeals Board, not just mailing. Therefore, the Board lacked the authority to consider the merits of the petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimelyDismissalJurisdictional Time LimitWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoint Findings Award OrdersWCJ ReportLabor Code Section 132aSerious and Willful MisconductCalOSHA Penalties
References
4
Case No. ADJ13057590; ADJ13058223
Regular
Aug 25, 2025

HEATHER RAMOS vs. PIH HEALTH, ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS

Applicant Heather Ramos sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings of Fact and Orders (F&O) which found defendant PIH Health and Athens Administrators had provided proof of service for a supplemental job displacement voucher (SJDV). The WCJ applied the presumption of timely mailing and receipt, finding applicant failed to rebut it and was not entitled to a penalty. Applicant contended there was no valid proof of service, and defendant did not meet the burden to invoke the presumption, thus entitling her to a penalty and attorney's fees. The Appeals Board upheld the WCJ's decision, concluding that the defendant's proof of service was valid, and applicant's evidence was insufficient to overcome the mailing presumption, therefore denying reconsideration.

Supplemental Job Displacement VoucherPresumption of ReceiptMailbox RuleProof of ServiceRebuttal EvidenceWCABPetition for ReconsiderationPenaltiesAttorney's FeesLabor Code Section 5814
References
13
Case No. ADJ1997686
Regular
Dec 24, 2010

JAVIER GUTIERREZ vs. COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., by ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Javier Gutierrez's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Board held that petitions for reconsideration are deemed filed upon receipt by the Board, not by mailing date. Gutierrez's petition, mailed on November 24, 2010, was not received until December 3, 2010, which was after the jurisdictional deadline. Therefore, the Board lacked authority to consider the petition.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Reconsiderationuntimelyjurisdictionalserved by mailreceived dateofficial address recordproof of servicedismissedadministrative law judge
References
3
Case No. ADJ7041310
Regular
Mar 03, 2014

ARCADIO TORRES vs. UNIVERSAL METAL PLATING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The WCAB found that the defendant's claim of late receipt of the Findings and Award was insufficient to overcome official records establishing timely service. The Board applied presumptions of regular performance of duty and ordinary course of mail, supported by case law, that service is complete upon mailing. Therefore, the petition was dismissed based on its untimeliness.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissedUntimelyFindings and AwardProof of ServicePresumption of ReceiptOfficial RecordsWCABEvid. Code § 664Evid. Code § 641
References
5
Showing 1-10 of 17,475 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational