CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ6955681
Regular
Jul 22, 2014

PAUL WEAVER vs. CITY OF STOCKTON, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by CORVEL

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, the applicant, a former firefighter, sought benefits for leukemia, claiming it was industrially caused. The defendant argued the applicant was not entitled to the presumption under Labor Code section 3212.1 due to the timing of the cancer's manifestation and the statute's amendment. The Board affirmed the original award, finding that one medical evaluator's opinion provided substantial evidence that the applicant's leukemia manifested within the original 60-month window following his service termination. Therefore, the Board did not need to decide the retroactivity of the later 120-month amendment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryCumulative TraumaLeukemiaPermanent Partial DisabilityPresumptionLabor Code Section 3212.1Firefighter
References
Case No. ADJ8150668
Regular
Aug 21, 2014

STEVEN JUDD vs. CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CORVEL CORVEL CORPORATIONS

This case concerns Steven Judd's workers' compensation claim for kidney cancer. The Appeals Board affirmed the finding that Judd sustained an industrial injury as a peace officer, granting him the presumption of compensability under Labor Code section 3212.1. The Board found the cancer developed during his employment, satisfying the statute's requirements even though it manifested later. The defendant failed to rebut the presumption by proving no reasonable link between the carcinogens Judd was exposed to and his cancer.

Labor Code section 3212.1peace officerkidney cancercumulative traumapresumptioncarcinogenlatency periodmanifestationdevelopmentAgreed Medical Evaluator (AME)
References
Case No. ADJ9352393, ADJ9352398, ADJ9531390
Regular
Apr 21, 2016

NORMAN WESEMAN vs. CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, Permissibly Self-Insured, SUPERIOR READY MIX, Permissibly Self-Insured

This case consolidates three workers' compensation claims for applicant Norman Weseman. The Appeals Board affirmed findings that claims against Superior Ready Mix (ADJ9531390) and the City of Cathedral City (ADJ9352398) for heart/hypertension and firefighter injuries were not barred by the statute of limitations. However, the Board rescinded a finding regarding a specific injury claim against the City of Cathedral City (ADJ9352393) due to insufficient medical evidence on the injury's manifestation date and returned it for further proceedings. The core legal issue concerns when the statute of limitations begins to run for latent industrial injuries.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDNorman WesemanCity of Cathedral CitySuperior Ready MixADJ9352393ADJ9352398ADJ9531390Findings and OrdersReconsiderationStatute of Limitations
References
Case No. ADJ15278643
Regular
Apr 19, 2023

FRANCIS GOODWIN vs. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY, CORVEL CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The defendant argued that the Labor Code Section 3212.1 cancer presumption did not apply because the applicant's date of injury was beyond the statutory 105-month extension period following his termination of service. However, the Board found that the applicant's essential thrombocytosis, a bone marrow cancer, developed within the statutory period, even though it manifested later. The Board relied on the IME's opinion that bone marrow cancers generally have a 5-10 year latency period, supporting the applicant's claim that the condition developed during his service.

Cancer presumptionLabor Code 3212.1Essential thrombocytosisLatency periodManifestationDevelopmentReasonable medical probabilityIndependent Medical ExaminerCarcinogen exposureFirefighter
References
Case No. ADJ7646505
Regular
Dec 31, 2018

GOOFFERY SHANEN vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO, COUNTY OF FRESNO, ANAHEIM FULLERTON TOWING, ROGERS HELICOPTER, INC., STATE COMPENSATIN INSURANCE FUND, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of Fresno's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that it acted within the statutory 60-day period to grant the applicant's initial petition. Furthermore, the Board affirmed that the applicant was entitled to the legal presumption that his cancers arose from his employment with Fresno County, as his cancers manifested within the extended period following his termination. Therefore, employer liability remains limited to his employment with the County of Fresno.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDeputy SheriffOccupational DiseaseCumulative InjuryTonsil CancerProstate CancerLabor Code section 3212.1Legal PresumptionPeace Officer
References
Case No. ADJ8734182
Regular
Dec 17, 2018

JONATHAN MCINTYRE vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case involves an applicant, Jonathan McIntyre, a deputy sheriff, claiming bladder cancer as a work-related injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior decision, finding that the medical evidence regarding the latency period of the applicant's bladder cancer was insufficient. The WCAB determined further development of the medical record is required to accurately assess when the cancer "developed" and "manifested" relative to the statutory presumption period. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the Workers' Compensation Judge.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDeputy SheriffBladder CancerLabor Code section 3212.1Presumption of CompensabilityLatency PeriodAgreed Medical EvaluatorManifestation of DiseaseDevelopment of CancerStatutory Presumption
References
Case No. ADJ2596572 (MON 0357137)
Regular
May 29, 2018

CRISTINA CORIA vs. CITY OF SANTA MONICA

This case involves a police officer's claim for industrial injury, specifically to her low back. The applicant contends the WCJ erred by not applying the Labor Code section 3213.2 "duty belt presumption" and improperly apportioning cervical spine disability. The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision, finding the independent medical evaluator's opinions did not properly rebut the presumption. The case is returned to the trial level for a determination on the applicability of the duty belt presumption and whether the injury manifested within the statutory timeframe. Issues regarding apportionment are preserved for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPolice OfficerCumulative InjuryBilateral Carpal Tunnel SyndromeBilateral Cubital Tunnel SyndromePermanent DisabilityApportionmentLabor Code Section 3213.2Duty Belt Presumption
References
Case No. ADJ8172168; ADJ8075196
Regular
Apr 17, 2013

RONALD PROCK vs. COUNTY OF BUTTE, Permissibly Self-Insured, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

This case involves a deputy sheriff, Ronald Prock, who suffered disabling heart symptoms in 2011, years after his retirement in 2001. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the prior findings, establishing the date of injury as December 31, 2002, to December 31, 2003, for cumulative trauma exposure. This determination assigns liability to the County of Butte JPA, as Prock was not employed by them or any other entity on the date his disability manifested and was known to be work-related (July 3, 2011). The WCAB clarifies that Labor Code section 5412's date of injury, which occurred after the last date of exposure, controls liability in this situation.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRonald ProckCounty of ButteJoint Powers AuthorityPermissibly Self-InsuredDeputy SheriffCumulative TraumaDate of InjuryManifestation of DisabilityStatute of Limitations
References
Case No. SFO 0496923
Regular
Jan 15, 2008

ROBERT THOMPSON (Deceased) NATALIA THOMPSON (Widow) vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Adjusting Agency

This case concerns a California Highway Patrol officer who died from melanoma. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award of death benefits, and found the injury was not industrial. The Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate a reasonable link between his employment and the melanoma, citing non-industrial risk factors such as childhood sun exposure and family history.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRobert ThompsonNatalia ThompsonCalifornia Highway PatrolLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundSFO 0496923Opinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings and Award
References
Case No. ADJ8547650
Regular
Apr 21, 2016

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES

This case concerns Ronald Hoglund's claim for workers' compensation benefits due to prostate cancer, presumed industrial under Labor Code section 3212.1. The defendant, California Highway Patrol, sought reconsideration, arguing the injury date was incorrect, precluding the presumption, and disputing the permanent disability rating. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify the employment period. Ultimately, the Board affirmed the award, modifying Finding of Fact No. 1 to reflect the applicant was employed by the CHP from June 1, 1970, through September 3, 2000.

Labor Code section 3212.1Petition for ReconsiderationAmended Findings and AwardWCJcumulative traumastatute of limitationspresumptioncarcinogenprimary siteFaust v. City of San Diego
References
Showing 1-10 of 30 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational