CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. CA 10-01067
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 01, 2011

TIMMONS, JOSEPH v. BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS, INC.

Joseph Timmons sustained injuries while working on property owned by Barrett Paving Materials, Inc., leading to a lawsuit alleging Labor Law violations. Barrett Paving then initiated a third-party action against Timmons' employer, Schneider Brothers Corporation, and a separate action against Colony Insurance Company. The Supreme Court granted Barrett's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Labor Law claims in Action No. 1, and denied Colony's motion in Action No. 2, declaring Barrett an additional insured. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's judgment, concluding that Labor Law §§ 240(1), 241(6), and 200 were inapplicable to the facts of the case. The court also affirmed Schneider's duty to defend Barrett and Colony's obligation to provide coverage to Barrett as an additional insured.

Labor LawSummary JudgmentAppellate DivisionWorkers' Compensation LawIndustrial Code RegulationsCommon-Law NegligenceContractual IndemnificationAdditional Insured EndorsementConstruction Site SafetyGravity-Related Accidents
References
23
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 02, 1981

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Newman

Plaintiff insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, mistakenly paid $9,805.66 to defendant Ruth Newman, intended for an aggregate trust fund related to her deceased husband's workers' compensation benefits. After forwarding the correct payment to the fund, Liberty Mutual sought restitution from Newman, who refused. The Workers' Compensation Board declined to intervene, stating no recourse existed under the Workers' Compensation Law for the error. Special Term initially granted summary judgment to Liberty Mutual. On appeal, the judgment was modified, with the Appellate Division agreeing it was a mistake of fact, not an overpayment of benefits, thus affirming the denial of Newman's summary judgment motion. However, the case was remitted to Special Term for a hearing to determine if ordering full restitution would cause a detrimental change in Newman's position regarding her benefits, and clarified that interest and costs should not be awarded against her.

restitutionmistake of factworkers' compensationsummary judgmentunjust enrichmentdetrimental relianceequityinsurance carrieraggregate trust fundappellate review
References
19
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Clayton B. Obersheimer, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America

Plaintiff, a subcontractor for Massa Construction, Inc., initiated an action against defendant surety to secure payment on a labor and materials bond after Massa ceased payments due to alleged breaches by plaintiff. Defendant denied plaintiff's claim, asserting plaintiff materially breached its subcontract by failing to make pension contributions, provide releases, and obtain a separate payment bond. The Supreme Court granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on liability, which defendant appealed. The Appellate Division affirmed, finding plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of compliance and defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding a material breach. The court noted that alleged non-payments to suppliers only affected the subcontract price, not Massa's obligation to continue performance, and found no requirement for plaintiff to pay pension contributions to the Iron Workers District Council or obtain a separate payment bond from glaziers unions.

SubcontractorSurety BondPublic Improvement ProjectLabor and Materials BondPartial Summary JudgmentAppellate ReviewBreach of ContractPension ContributionsPayment ObligationsGlaziers Unions
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of Campbell v. Interstate Materials Corporation

The claimant, an operating manager for Interstate Materials Corporation, suffered injuries to his neck, back, and knees in August 2006 and a second lower back injury in April 2008. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially classified the claimant with a permanent total disability and struck the independent medical examiner's report. The Workers' Compensation Board reversed this, finding the IME report improperly precluded due to the examiner's hospitalization and reclassified the claimant with a permanent partial disability, equally apportioned between the two accidents. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding no abuse of discretion in considering the IME report and that substantial evidence supported both the permanent partial disability classification and the equal apportionment of the disability.

Permanent Partial DisabilityPermanent Total DisabilityWorkers' Compensation BoardApportionment of DisabilityMedical EvidenceIndependent Medical Examination (IME)Cross-Examination RightsAbuse of DiscretionSubstantial EvidenceConflicting Medical Opinions
References
12
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Clancey v. American Management Ass'n, Inc.

This age discrimination action involves plaintiffs alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and New York State statutes against defendant American Management Association (AMA). AMA moved for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiffs were independent contractors, not employees, and thus not eligible for ADEA claims. The court, applying the 'economic realities' test consistent with Second Circuit precedent, found numerous disputed material facts regarding the plaintiffs' employment status. These facts included AMA's control over plaintiffs, their opportunity for profit or loss, the duration of their working relationship, and the integral nature of their work to AMA's business. Consequently, the court denied AMA's motion for summary judgment, determining that genuine issues of material fact exist concerning whether the plaintiffs were employees or independent contractors.

Age DiscriminationEmployment LawIndependent Contractor StatusSummary Judgment MotionEconomic Realities TestADEAFLSAWorker ClassificationControl TestSecond Circuit Precedent
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Peckham v. Peckham Materials Corp.

This case involves an appeal by the defendant, Peckham Materials Corporation, in a wrongful death action. The plaintiff's decedent, John S. Peckham, was killed in a helicopter crash while a passenger in a company-owned helicopter. The defendant appealed an order from the Supreme Court, Westchester County, which granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, striking the affirmative defense of workers' compensation. The Appellate Division reversed the order, holding that the Workers' Compensation Board has primary jurisdiction to determine the applicability of compensation benefits. The matter was remitted to the Supreme Court with instructions to defer the motion's disposition until the Workers' Compensation Board makes a final determination regarding the plaintiff's eligibility for benefits.

Wrongful DeathWorkers' CompensationPrimary JurisdictionSummary JudgmentAppellate ReviewHelicopter AccidentEmployer LiabilityJudicial DeferenceRemittalEstate Claim
References
4
Case No. ADJ10447649
Regular
Jan 16, 2018

ALI KENDRICK vs. HOLOGIC, INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA AND ITS PROPERTY CASUALTY AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES

The defendant, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, sought reconsideration of an award based on stipulated facts. They argued that a mutual mistake occurred regarding the date of injury, leading to an overpayment of permanent disability benefits. The Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration, finding the petition should be treated as a petition to set aside the award at the trial level. The WCJ will now conduct proceedings to determine if good cause exists to rescind or amend the award due to a mutual mistake of fact.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalStipulations with Request for AwardMutual Mistake of FactIndustrial InjuryBilateral ElbowsBilateral WristsPermanent DisabilityIndemnity
References
7
Case No. 91 Civ. 2519
Regular Panel Decision

Freer v. Mayer

Shareholder David Freer filed a derivative action against E. Hale Mayer and Progressive Bank, Inc., alleging violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Freer claimed that proxy statements omitted material facts regarding a retirement agreement between Mayer and the bank, particularly concerning its business purpose. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the federal claims, holding that directors were not obligated to disclose underlying motivations, provided objective material facts were disclosed. Subsequently, the court dismissed the remaining state law claims, including breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste, citing a lack of subject matter jurisdiction after the federal claims were resolved.

Securities Exchange ActProxy StatementShareholder Derivative SuitSummary JudgmentFiduciary DutyCorporate WasteSupplemental JurisdictionMaterial OmissionBusiness Judgment RuleRule 14a-9
References
25
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 08, 2011

Baisch, Inc. v. Pike Co.

This case is an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, which denied the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on its counterclaim for breach of a construction contract. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff failed to perform in a timely manner, provide adequate labor and materials, and abandoned the contract. The appellate court affirmed the denial of summary judgment, finding that issues of fact existed regarding what constituted a reasonable time for performance when the contract did not specify it, and the adequacy of labor and materials supplied by the plaintiff. Furthermore, the court determined there was an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff's actions constituted an unqualified and clear refusal to perform the entire contract, which would be considered an anticipatory repudiation. The court also declined to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.

construction contractbreach of contractsummary judgmenttimely performanceadequate labor and materialsanticipatory repudiationcontract abandonmentappellate reviewissues of factcontract interpretation
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Fox v. Cheminova, Inc.

Commercial fishermen (Plaintiffs Fox, Makowsky, Crismale) sued Cheminova (pesticide manufacturer) over a 1999 lobster die-off in Long Island Sound, alleging pesticides sprayed for West Nile Virus were the cause. The lawsuit evolved into a 'failure to warn' claim, asserting Cheminova's Fyfanon pesticide label lacked adequate warnings for aquatic environments. Cheminova moved for summary judgment, citing FIFRA preemption, government emergency doctrine immunity, and lack of material facts for state law claims. The court denied Cheminova's motion, concluding that genuine issues of material fact regarding FIFRA compliance, state law applicability (negligence, strict liability, public nuisance), and the proximate cause of the lobster die-off necessitated a jury trial. Decisions on expert testimony admissibility were deferred, and motions to strike expert affidavits were denied without prejudice.

Pesticide LiabilityFailure to WarnFIFRA PreemptionSummary Judgment MotionExpert Testimony AdmissibilityDaubert ChallengeCausation DisputeEnvironmental TortProduct LiabilityLong Island Sound
References
27
Showing 1-10 of 3,645 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational