CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 05, 1993

Guillory v. Nautilus Real Estate, Inc.

An electrician, Guillory, employed by Coyne Electrical Contractors, Inc., was injured after falling from a ladder while installing light fixtures in a building owned by Nautilus Real Estate, Inc. He was struck by debris and fell, suffering a shoulder injury. The Supreme Court denied Nautilus's motion to dismiss the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and granted Guillory's motion for a directed verdict on liability against Nautilus. The appeals court affirmed these decisions, holding Nautilus liable as the owner for failing to provide adequate safety devices. However, the appeals court modified the judgment by reinstating Nautilus's third-party complaint for implied indemnity against Coyne, reasoning that Nautilus's liability was vicarious and it could recover from the entity that controlled the work. The court also found the jury's substantial damages award for pain and suffering not excessive given the severity of Guillory's injuries and ongoing medical issues.

Ladder fallRotator cuff injuryImplied indemnityVicarious liabilityLabor LawPremises liabilityWorker injuryNegligenceDirected verdictDamages
References
12
Case No. ADJ3417556 (OAK328205)
Regular
Feb 02, 2012

, Matney A. Guillory, Jr. vs. , City College of San Francisco,

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding a prior award and remanding the case for further development of the record. The primary issue was whether vocational experts should have the opportunity to revise their opinions on diminished future earning capacity in light of a recent appellate court decision (*Ogilvie III*) issued just before trial. The Board found that the vocational reports, based on older law, were outdated and remanding would allow experts to re-evaluate consistent with the new precedent. The Board did not address the applicant's other contentions, including the exclusion of a QME report and the admission of sub rosa video, but noted the WCJ could revisit these issues after further record development.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMatney A. GuilloryJr.City College of San FranciscoADJ3417556OAK328205Opinion and OrderGranting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationPermanent Disability
References
2
Case No. ADJ8005991, ADJ8325457
Regular
Jan 03, 2018

ANTHONY GUILLORY vs. WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOLS INSURANCE GROUP

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Removal in this case. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, only granted if substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will occur, and reconsideration would be inadequate. The Board found the applicant failed to demonstrate these grounds, referencing the administrative law judge's analysis. The applicant can raise these issues before the trial judge.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalDenying RemovalSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmReconsiderationAdequate RemedyWCJ ReportExtraordinary RemedyCalifornia Workers' Compensation
References
0
Showing 1-3 of 3 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational