CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Spherenomics Global Contact Centers v. Vcustomer Corp.

Plaintiff Spherenomics Global Contact Centers sued defendant vCustomer Corporation for breach of a non-solicitation agreement, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, and unjust enrichment. Spherenomics, a provider of outsourced call-center services, alleged that VCC, its subcontractor, improperly solicited and secured a long-term contract with their mutual client, Fingerhut, in violation of their November 2002 agreement. While the court found that VCC indeed breached the non-solicitation provision, it ultimately ruled in favor of VCC. The court concluded that Spherenomics failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that VCC's breach directly caused Spherenomics to suffer damages, specifically lost profits, deeming such claims too speculative to be recoverable under New York contract law or equitable theories.

Breach of ContractNon-Solicitation AgreementLost ProfitsDamagesCausationPromissory EstoppelUnjust EnrichmentContract LawNew York LawFederal Jurisdiction
References
32
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

John R. v. State of New York Office of Children and Family Services

Petitioners Patricia R. and John R. were 'indicated' for child maltreatment after their children had continued contact with an uncle who had sexually abused their oldest daughter. Despite being explicitly instructed by a child protective services caseworker to prevent any contact, the children reported seeing and greeting the uncle. Patricia R. even sent the youngest child to the uncle's apartment. The petitioners challenged this determination in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, requesting the report be amended to unfounded. However, the court confirmed the determination, finding substantial evidence that the children's physical, mental, or emotional condition was impaired or in imminent danger due to the petitioners' failure to exercise a minimum degree of care in supervision.

Child MaltreatmentChild AbuseSexual AbuseParental NeglectFailure to SuperviseCPLR Article 78Administrative ReviewSubstantial EvidenceFamily LawChild Protection
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Avila v. Northport Car Wash, Inc.

Plaintiffs, car laborers, initiated an action against various car wash businesses and their owners, alleging unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York State Labor Law, as well as denial of minimum wage. The plaintiffs sought conditional certification for a collective action, the production of contact information for potential class members from May 2004 through December 2010, and court authorization to circulate a notice of pendency. The Court granted the motion for conditional certification, agreeing to a six-year look-back period for contact information due to the longer state law statute of limitations, and approved the dissemination of the notice with specific modifications regarding language about potential testimony and cost liability.

FLSAOvertime CompensationMinimum WageCollective ActionConditional CertificationNew York State Labor LawOpt-in PlaintiffsStatute of LimitationsNotice of PendencyCar Wash Industry
References
19
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Carpino v. National Store Fixtures, Inc.

Plaintiff Louis P. Carpiño was injured in a fall at his employer's warehouse and, along with his wife, sued general contractors. An amended complaint added Conner Industries, Inc., the supplier of the allegedly defective wood, alleging products liability. Conner moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Supreme Court granted the dismissal, finding plaintiffs failed to establish minimal contacts between Conner, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas, and New York. The Appellate Division affirmed this decision, concluding that Conner lacked sufficient minimum contacts with New York to subject it to the state's jurisdiction under CPLR 302 (a) (1) or CPLR 302 (a) (3) (ii), thus upholding the dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.

personal jurisdictionlong-arm jurisdictionminimum contactsdue processforeign corporationproducts liabilityLabor Lawinterstate commercetortious actappellate review
References
14
Case No. 2025 NY Slip Op 05207
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 30, 2025

Smith v. Global Contact Holding Co., Inc.

The Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirmed an order from the Supreme Court, New York County. The Supreme Court order had granted the defendants' motion to compel nonparty appellant Transport Workers Union, Local 100's compliance with a subpoena duces tecum. The union argued improper service of the motion, relying on a statutory provision no longer in effect. The court found that the union had waived its objection to personal jurisdiction by failing to object to jurisdiction in response to a prior motion to compel, despite its counsel receiving the subpoena. Furthermore, the union failed to demonstrate that the motion to compel constituted harassment or annoyance, as it sought compliance with a prior order to turn over relevant documents. A separate motion by defendants for Sandra Lennon to withdraw her appeal was granted.

Appellate DivisionSubpoena Duces TecumMotion to CompelPersonal JurisdictionWaiver of ObjectionCivil ProcedureNonparty AppellantUnion DocumentsDiscovery DisputeJudiciary Law
References
6
Case No. 2018 NY Slip Op 03093
Regular Panel Decision
May 01, 2018

Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v. New York City Tr. Auth.

This case addresses the applicable statute of limitations for no-fault claims against a self-insured entity. The Court of Appeals determined that the three-year statute of limitations under CPLR 214 (2) governs such claims, as the obligation to provide no-fault benefits by a self-insurer is statutory rather than contractual. This decision reversed the Appellate Division, which had applied a six-year statute of limitations based on a contractual nature. The Court clarified that in the absence of a private insurance contract, the self-insurer's liability for first-party benefits is wholly statutory. The ruling impacts procedural aspects without altering the substantive no-fault obligations of self-insurers.

Statute of LimitationsNo-Fault InsuranceSelf-Insurer LiabilityCPLR 214 (2)CPLR 213 (2)Statutory ObligationContractual ObligationFirst-Party BenefitsMotor Vehicle AccidentsAppellate Review
References
30
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

New York State Restaurant Ass'n v. Commissioner of Labor

This case involved a CPLR article 78 proceeding initiated by an employer association to challenge a determination by the Industrial Board of Appeals (IBA). The IBA had confirmed a minimum wage order from the Commissioner of Labor, which increased the cash wage for food service workers. The petitioner argued that the Commissioner lacked authority to set a wage lower than legislatively mandated and was constrained in considering other factors. The court converted the proceeding to a direct appeal and affirmed the IBA's determination, concluding that Labor Law § 655 (5) prohibits setting a cash wage less than that specified in Labor Law § 652 (4). The court found the petitioner's arguments without merit.

Minimum WageFood Service WorkersLabor Law InterpretationStatutory AuthorityWage Board ReviewIndustrial Board of AppealsCommissioner of LaborCPLR Article 78 ConversionJudicial Review of Agency ActionEmployer Association Appeal
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Goff v. Whitehall Central School District

This case involves an appeal concerning the interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement between the Whitehall Central School District and its employees. The dispute centers on whether "snow days" should be included in the calculation of guaranteed minimum payment days for part-time bus drivers (180 days) and cafeteria employees (170 days), even if the employees have already met those minimums through other workdays. The school district denied a grievance, arguing that snow days only count if needed to reach the minimum. Special Term initially reversed the board's decision, asserting that snow days should always be included. However, this appellate court reversed Special Term's judgment, ruling that the contract's intent was to count snow days only when necessary to fulfill the assured minimum number of payment days, and not to provide additional payment once the minimum was achieved. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Collective Bargaining AgreementSnow DaysEmployment ContractWage DisputeSchool DistrictArticle 78 ProceedingContract InterpretationGrievanceAppellate ReviewEmployee Rights
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
May 22, 2009

In re Jessica L.

This case concerns an appeal by a father against a finding of neglect regarding his two children. The children resided with their mother, who had a history of drug use. The father, suspecting the mother was currently using drugs, anonymously contacted the Administration for Children's Services (ACS). Although the mother subsequently tested positive for cocaine, the appellate court reversed the Family Court's neglect finding against the father. The court determined that the father's actions, including his proactive call to ACS, met the minimum degree of care required and did not constitute neglect, thereby vacating the finding and dismissing the petition against him.

Family LawChild NeglectParental RightsAppellate ReviewFamily CourtSubstance AbuseDrug TestingACS InterventionMinimum Degree of CareReversal of Finding
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Brzychnalski v. Unesco, Inc.

Plaintiffs, asbestos workers, filed a lawsuit alleging their employers violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Minimum Wage Act (NYMWA) by evading overtime payments through a scheme of issuing multiple paychecks from related companies. They sought to proceed as a collective action under FLSA, for class certification under NYMWA, expedited discovery of employee contacts, authorization to send opt-in notices, and leave to add two named plaintiffs. The court, presided over by District Judge Chin, granted all motions, finding the class similarly situated, rejecting defendants' objections, and concluding that class action requirements were met for both the FLSA and NYMWA claims.

FLSANYMWAOvertime CompensationWage and HourCollective ActionClass CertificationRule 23Opt-inOpt-outDiscovery
References
7
Showing 1-10 of 493 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational