CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2025 NY Slip Op 06564
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 26, 2025

Matter of Raivyn BB. (Courtney BB.)

This case concerns appeals from Family Court orders adjudicating Raivyn BB. a neglected child due to alleged parental drug use by mother Courtney BB. and father Kip AA. The child tested positive for methamphetamines after birth, prompting neglect petitions. The Appellate Division reversed the neglect findings against both parents. The court found that the evidence did not establish a direct causal link between the mother's methamphetamine use and the child's impairment, noting potential withdrawal symptoms from prescribed Subutex. Furthermore, the father's conduct, including hostility or refusal to sign a birth certificate, was not deemed to constitute neglect, and no evidence showed his knowledge of the mother's drug use. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed.

Neglected ChildParental Drug UseChild ToxicologyMethamphetamineSubutexFamily Court Act Article 10Appellate ReviewCausative ConnectionImpairment of ChildMinimum Degree of Care
References
15
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
May 01, 2014

Matter of Marcus JJ.

This case concerns an appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County, which granted a petition to adjudicate the respondent's children neglected. The respondent, the biological mother of two sons, argued that she was not a 'person legally responsible' for the children at the time of the alleged neglect and challenged the merits of the neglect finding. The Family Court's decision was supported by evidence of the mother's inappropriate behavior, including yelling and profanities during meetings, verbal and physical threats against her older son, a positive cocaine test, and her subsequent refusal to undergo drug tests. Additionally, the children were exposed to domestic violence perpetrated against the mother by her paramour, which caused them distress. The appellate court affirmed the Family Court's order, finding no merit in the respondent's contentions and substantial support in the record for the finding of neglect.

Child NeglectFamily Law AppealParental MisconductDomestic Violence ExposureDrug AbuseChild Protective ServicesParental RightsSupervised VisitsCredibility AssessmentAppellate Review
References
16
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Kenneth V.

This is an appeal from a Family Court order that found respondent August V., Ill neglected his children. The proceeding was initiated by the petitioner, alleging neglect due to the parents' refusal to accept intensive counseling for two children exhibiting aggressive behavior, including wielding a knife. The Family Court initially found the father neglected all seven children. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, finding no evidence of parental misconduct by the father. The court determined that treatment recommendations were not directly communicated to the father, and he was unaware of the escalated fighting. Consequently, the petition against August V., Ill was dismissed due to insufficient proof of neglect.

NeglectChild protectionParental misconductFamily lawChild welfareAbuseErie CountyAppellate reviewParental responsibilityMental health services
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Glenn II.

This is an appeal by Respondent Lisa II. from an order of the Family Court of Tioga County. The Family Court granted a petitioner's application to adjudicate Lisa II.'s three children (Tiffany, Glenn, and Jeffrey) as neglected. The neglect allegations stemmed from the parents' failure to prevent the twin boys from accessing cigarettes, lighters, and matches, and respondent's failure to follow through with recommended preventative services. Evidence showed the boys were repeatedly accessing fire-inducing materials, leading to dangerous incidents, and the respondent subsequently refused to lock up lighters. The appellate court affirmed the Family Court's finding, concluding that the evidence sufficiently supported the neglect finding.

Child NeglectFamily Court Act Article 10Parental DutyChild SafetyFire ExperimentationPreventative ServicesAppellate ReviewAffirmation of OrderTioga CountyParental Responsibility
References
2
Case No. 2017 NY Slip Op 07357
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 19, 2017

Matter of Kathleen NN. (Dennis NN.)

This case involves three neglect proceedings initiated by the Sullivan County Department of Family Services and the Attorney for the Child against Dennis NN. (father), Justin EE. (mother's boyfriend), and Angelica FF. (mother) concerning Kathleen NN., an alleged neglected child. The Family Court of Sullivan County initially dismissed all three petitions. The Appellate Division, Third Department, reversed the dismissal concerning Dennis NN., finding that his actions of dropping the child during an altercation placed her in imminent danger of harm, thus granting the neglect petition against him and remitting the matter for a dispositional hearing. However, the Appellate Division affirmed the dismissals against Justin EE. and Angelica FF., concluding that there was insufficient evidence to prove neglect or that Justin EE. was a legal custodian at the time of the incident, and that the mother's conduct did not demonstrate imminent danger to the child.

Child NeglectFamily Court ActImminent DangerParental ResponsibilitySafety Plan Non-ComplianceAppellate DivisionChild CustodyPreponderance of EvidencePhysical AltercationChild Protective Report
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 05, 2006

In re Ian H.

This case involves an appeal from a Family Court order adjudicating a respondent's children neglected. The respondent, a substitute day-care worker, was accused of sexually abusing female children attending a day-care center operated by his wife. Petitioner initiated a neglect proceeding, alleging derivative neglect of the respondent's twin sons based on his inappropriate conduct with other children. The Family Court found that the respondent neglected three children by sexually abusing them, demonstrating a fundamental defect in parenting that derivatively neglected his own children. The Appellate Division affirmed this finding, concluding that out-of-court statements of the abused children were properly admitted and sufficiently corroborated, and the Family Court appropriately exercised its discretion in not compelling a child's testimony.

Child NeglectDerivative NeglectSexual AbuseFamily Court Act Article 10Out-of-court StatementsCorroborationHearsay ExceptionJudicial DiscretionParental JudgmentChild Testimony
References
13
Case No. N2361-72
Regular Panel Decision

In re Gigi B.

The case concerns a neglect proceeding against Patricia B. for the alleged neglect of her infant, Gigi, due to the mother's drug addiction. The Bureau of Child Welfare subpoenaed records from the New York State Narcotic Addiction Control Commission regarding Patricia B.'s rehabilitation, which both the commission and the mother argued were protected by statutory privilege under the Mental Hygiene Law. The court determined that any state privilege was waived by the commission's communication of Patricia B.'s drug test results and that the Family Court Act, specifically Section 1038, superseded the Mental Hygiene Law due to its more recent enactment and focus on child protection. Emphasizing the paramount importance of the child's due process rights, the court concluded that the privilege established by the Mental Hygiene Law, similar to other professional privileges, is overridden in child abuse and neglect situations. Consequently, the court denied the motion to quash the subpoena and overruled the objection to the introduction of the records, ordering them to be opened for review.

NeglectChild WelfareDrug AddictionStatutory PrivilegeFamily Court ActMental Hygiene LawWaiver of PrivilegeSubpoenaConfidentialityDue Process
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 12, 1992

In re Jamie C.

This case involves an appeal from a Family Court order in Broome County, which granted a petitioner's application to adjudicate the respondents' children as abused and/or neglected. The Family Court had found the father, James D., sexually and physically abused his daughter Jamie C. and neglected all four children, while the mother, Barbara C., sexually abused Jamie and neglected all four. On appeal, the finding of sexual abuse against the mother was reversed due to insufficient corroborating evidence and Jamie C.'s conflicting sworn testimony. However, the findings of the father's sexual and physical abuse, and both parents' neglect stemming from chronic alcohol abuse and violent behavior, were affirmed based on Jamie's credible testimony and other evidence presented.

Family LawChild AbuseChild NeglectSexual AbusePhysical AbuseAlcohol AbuseCredibility of TestimonyCorroboration of EvidenceAppellate ReviewFamily Court Act
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Camara R.

This appeal concerns the dismissal of a neglect petition against parents whose infant son, Antonio, twice suffered from nonorganic failure to thrive. Antonio showed significant weight gain during hospitalizations but lost weight at home, despite prior parental instructions. Evidence presented included the parents' resistance to medical advice, unsanitary home conditions, and the father's substance abuse. The Family Court initially found insufficient evidence of neglect, but the appellate court reversed, concluding that the petitioner had established a prima facie case of both direct neglect of Antonio and derivative neglect of his siblings. The matter was remitted to the Family Court for further proceedings.

NeglectFamily Court Act Article 10Failure to ThriveChild WelfareParental MisconductAppellate ReviewPrima Facie EvidenceChild Protective ServicesMedical NeglectSubstance Abuse
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Desmond LL.

This case involves an appeal from a Family Court's dismissal of a neglect petition against a respondent concerning her two children, Desmond LL. and Joshua LL. The petition was initiated after Joshua sustained suspicious injuries following an unsupervised visit with the respondent. The Family Court had previously dismissed the petition, citing insufficient proof of neglect. The appellate court affirmed this decision, giving deference to the Family Court's credibility assessments regarding conflicting medical testimony about the nature and cause of Joshua's injuries. Consequently, the court found no basis to establish neglect for Joshua, nor derivative neglect for Desmond.

NeglectChild ProtectionFamily Court ActAppellate DivisionChild WelfareSufficiency of EvidenceCredibility DeterminationsMedical EvidenceParental ResponsibilityVisitation Rights
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 1,320 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational