CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1407862 ADJ8053285
Regular
Jan 29, 2014

RAYMOND SCHAUER vs. WINDSOR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, REDWOOD EMPIRE SCHOOL INSURANCE GROUP

In this workers' compensation case, venue is transferred from the Santa Rosa to the San Francisco District Office. This change is necessary because the assigned judge must recuse himself and the alternative judge has been disqualified. The San Francisco Presiding Judge will assign a new judge and schedule a lien conference. This order facilitates the continued proceedings for Applicant Raymond Schauer against Windsor Unified School District.

Venue changeRecusalJudge challengeAppeals Board Rule 10453Santa Rosa District OfficeSan Francisco District OfficePresiding JudgeLien conferencePermissibly Self-InsuredWindsor Unified School District
References
Case No. ADJ900432 (SAC 0323091)
Regular
Dec 30, 2011

MARLENE COPUS vs. NORTH SACRAMENTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

This case involves a dispute over the necessity of spinal surgery for an applicant who sustained a cumulative trauma injury to her neck and back. While the applicant's treating physician recommended surgery, a second opinion physician disagreed, citing a lack of nerve root compression. The Appeals Board found that the medical evidence was insufficient to determine the necessity of surgery, particularly in light of ACOEM Practice Guidelines which generally recommend against surgery without nerve root compression. Therefore, the Board rescinded the prior award and remanded the case to appoint an independent physician to evaluate the applicant and determine the reasonableness and necessity of the proposed surgery.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMarlene CopusNorth Sacramento Elementary School Districtcumulative traumaspinal surgerynerve root impingementcervical stenosisDr. OrisekDr. GregoriusACOEM Practice Guidelines
References
Case No. ADJ6674320, ADJ4552593
Regular
Apr 23, 2018

KIMBERLY DE NOVA-JOY vs. SANTA PAULA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

In *De Nova-Joy v. Santa Paula Elementary School District*, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a February 2, 2018 decision. The WCAB found reconsideration necessary to allow further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just decision. All future correspondence and filings related to the petition must be directed to the WCAB Commissioners in San Francisco, not district offices or e-filed via EAMS. Trial-level documents unrelated to the petition should continue to be e-filed, but proposed settlements require notification to the Appeals Board as a WCJ cannot act on them during reconsideration.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationGrant of ReconsiderationSanta Paula Elementary School DistrictYork Risk Services GroupADJ6674320ADJ4552593San FranciscoEAMSAdministrative Director
References
Case No. ADJ7962270
Regular
Jun 10, 2014

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. ASSESSMENT OF OPTION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REMOVAL

Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District filed an untimely Petition for Removal arguing discovery should have closed at the mandatory settlement conference. The petition was filed 23 days after the Order, exceeding the 20-day limit. Since the defendant received personal service of the Order at the hearing, they were not entitled to a five-day extension for filing. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as untimely.

Petition for RemovalUntimely FilingMandatory Settlement Conference (MSC)Off CalendarDevelopment of RecordLabor Code Section 5502(d)(3)Due DiligenceWCAB Rule 10843(a)Personal ServiceCode of Civil Procedure Section 1013(a)
References
Case No. ADJ8791212, ADJ9504979
Regular
Apr 19, 2016

HECTOR MELGAR vs. SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROTECTED INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR SCHOOLS

This case involves a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Hector Melgar against Sequoia Union High School District. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued an order dismissing this petition. The dismissal is due to the petitioner's withdrawal of the reconsideration request. Therefore, the Board has formally closed the matter regarding this specific petition.

Petition for Reconsideration withdrawnDismissed petitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardSequoia Union High School DistrictProtected Insurance Program for SchoolsADJ8791212ADJ9504979San Francisco District OfficeMarguerite SweeneyFrank M. Brass
References
Case No. ADJ8517780
Regular
Jun 03, 2013

DEANNA ROBBINS vs. SUSANVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant school district's petition for reconsideration. The district challenged the calculation of the applicant's average weekly earnings, arguing her probationary status should reduce the figure. However, the Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding, determining that the applicant's earnings capacity was properly calculated based on her actual earnings from multiple employers prior to the injury. The Board emphasized that earning capacity is a dynamic assessment, not limited to the applicant's immediate employment status.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSusanville Elementary School DistrictDeanna RobbinsPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awardcumulative injuryupper extremitiesaverage weekly earningsearning capacityLabor Code section 4453(c)(4)
References
Case No. ADJ2929021 (MON 0344046)
Regular
Feb 25, 2014

RONALD KELSEY vs. BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCRMA

This case concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Barstow Unified School District and SCRMA (the defendants) regarding a decision issued on December 27, 2013. The petitioner, the defendants, has officially withdrawn their petition. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has dismissed the petition. The dismissal order was issued on February 25, 2014.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationDismissedWithdrawnApplicantDefendantSchool DistrictSCRMASan Bernardino District OfficeConfidenital
References
Case No. ADJ8534435
Regular
Jan 11, 2013

RONALD EHMAN vs. AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because venue orders are not considered final. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding the WCJ properly transferred venue to the Oakland District Office. This decision was based on the applicant's residence in Solano County and the injury occurring in Contra Costa County, neither of which have district offices, and Oakland being the nearest office to the injury site. The defendant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm would result from the venue change.

VenueReconsiderationRemovalLabor Code section 5501.5District OfficeApplicant ResidenceInjury LocationContra Costa CountySolano CountyOakland District Office
References
Case No. ADJ7547129
Regular
Sep 30, 2016

PETRA CABANAS PINO vs. INGLEWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant Inglewood Unified School District's Petition for Removal. The defendant argued the judge improperly took the trial off calendar. The Board found the defendant failed to show the order would cause significant prejudice or irreparable harm. Therefore, the Petition for Removal was denied, without addressing other issues raised.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ OrderTrial Off CalendarSignificant PrejudiceIrreparable HarmPermissibly Self-InsuredInglewood Unified School DistrictAdministrative Law JudgeReport and Recommendation
References
Case No. ADJ9908969
Regular
Aug 28, 2015

MICHAEL MCGRATH vs. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, HAZELRIGG CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

This case involves a dispute over venue for a workers' compensation claim. The employer, Oakland Unified School District, sought to transfer the case from Oxnard to Oakland, arguing the applicant resides and was injured in Oakland's jurisdiction, despite the application initially being filed in Oxnard based on the applicant's attorney's principal place of business. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal, rescinding the judge's denial of the venue change. The WCAB found the judge applied the wrong legal standard and that the employer's objection to venue, made pursuant to Labor Code section 5501.5(c), mandated a transfer to Oakland.

Petition for RemovalOrder Denying Change of VenueWCJsubstantial prejudiceirreparable harmreconsiderationWCAB District OfficeOakland WCAB District OfficeOxnard WCAB District Officevenue transfer
References
Showing 1-10 of 2,658 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational