CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ7639697
Regular
Dec 18, 2014

JUAN CARRILLO vs. TAVERNA TONY, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

This case involves a defendant's Petition for Removal challenging the suspension of a lien dismissal. The administrative law judge initially suspended the dismissal of Joyce Altman Interpreters' lien pending trial. Subsequently, the case was taken off calendar, and the judge then issued an order dismissing the lien, which became final as no reconsideration was sought. Because the lien has been dismissed, the defendant's petition for removal regarding the earlier suspension is now moot and has been dismissed by the Appeals Board.

Petition for RemovalOrder Suspending Notice of Intent to Dismiss Lienlien trialObjection to dismissaluntimely objectionOrder to Dismiss Liensmoot petitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJlien dismissal
References
Case No. ADJ7242258
Regular
Feb 21, 2012

ANGELICA ALVARADO vs. SIZZLER, INTERCARE, AMERICAN CLAIMS

This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a WCAB order dismissing her workers' compensation claim for lack of prosecution. The applicant's claim was dismissed under WCAB Rule 10582 after the defendant filed a petition and the WCJ issued a notice of intention to dismiss. Although the applicant filed timely objections stating she was continuing discovery and treatment, the WCJ proceeded with the dismissal. The majority denied reconsideration, noting the dismissal was without prejudice, allowing the applicant to refile or seek to set aside the order. One Commissioner dissented, arguing the dismissal abused discretion given the timely objections and that the majority's solution creates unnecessary procedural hurdles, contradicting the system's goal of expeditious resolution.

WCAB Rule 10582Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseLack of ProsecutionNotice of Intention to DismissGood CauseObjections to DismissalDiscovery ContinuesMedical TreatmentLabor Code Section 5803
References
Case No. ADJ3505181 (POM 0262203)
Regular
Mar 26, 2019

DANIEL HERRERA vs. ROBERT HARMAN & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES, MCKELVEY, BELLWOOD LAUNDRY & LINEN, CROTHALL LAUNDRY SERVICE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded an order dismissing the applicant's case for lack of prosecution. The dismissal occurred because the applicant's objection to the dismissal petition was allegedly not properly filed with the EAMS system, despite being mailed to the District Office. The WCAB found sufficient evidence in the applicant's petition and supporting documents to warrant a hearing on the merits of the dismissal. The case is returned to the trial level for the judge to set a hearing and consider the dismissal petition.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseLack of ProsecutionEAMSPetition for Dismissal for Lack of Diligent ProsecutionNotice of Intention to DismissObjection to DismissalRescindedReturned to Trial Level
References
Case No. ADJ3490988 (MON0328106)
Regular
Aug 11, 2009

ARTURO OLIVARES vs. FIRST CLASS CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The applicant sought reconsideration of a dismissal order for his workers' compensation claim. The WCJ dismissed the case for lack of prosecution under Rule 10582. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal, and returned the case to the trial level. This was because the dismissal was issued without the required ten-day notice of intention and opportunity to be heard, and the applicant's objection was not adequately addressed.

WCABReconsiderationDismissalLack of ProsecutionWCAB Rule 10582Notice of Intention to DismissOpportunity to be HeardObjectionMeritsRescinded
References
Case No. ADJ7172643; ADJ7172641
Regular
Apr 02, 2012

JUSTIN MILLER vs. PF CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves an applicant whose workers' compensation claims were dismissed by the WCJ for lack of activity and prosecution. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing due process violations and non-compliance with dismissal procedures. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding the applicant's objections vague and lacking specific reasons for the lack of prosecution despite ample opportunity. A dissenting opinion argued that the dismissal constituted an abuse of discretion as the applicant had indicated an intention to prosecute the claim.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Order Dismissing Applicationswithout prejudicePetition for Dismissallack of activity and prosecutionNotice of Intent to Dismiss Applicationsobjections overruleddue process rights violatedCalifornia Code of Regulations title 8 section 10582
References
Case No. ADJ8552899
Regular
Jun 12, 2017

ANTWANETTE SCONIERS vs. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an order dismissing a lien claim. The WCJ had dismissed the lien for non-appearance at a lien conference. However, the WCJ issued the dismissal order before the statutory 15-day period for objection had expired. Therefore, the WCAB vacated the dismissal order and remanded the case for further proceedings to determine if the lien claimant had good cause to object.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lienlien claimantWCJCompromise and ReleaseDeclaration of Readinesslien conferenceNotice of Intent to Dismiss LienNon-Appearance
References
Case No. ADJ4250427 (MON 0359204)
Regular
Sep 16, 2011

ANA AGUILAR vs. METRO BUILDING MAINTENANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

In this case, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded an order dismissing applicant Ana Aguilar's claim for lack of prosecution. The Board found that applicant's attorney was relieved as counsel and had lost contact with the applicant prior to the dismissal order, raising due process concerns. The dismissal order was based on a defendant's petition and a notice of intention to dismiss, but the Board found no evidence that the applicant actually received these notices. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level to ensure the applicant has an opportunity to be heard.

WCAB Rule 10582dismissal for lack of prosecutionex parte orderdue processlack of noticepetition for dismissalnotice of intention to dismissmotion to be relieved as counselcumulative traumamaintenance worker
References
Case No. ADJ4297322
Regular
Apr 26, 2013

ARTURO SALAS vs. BAY CITY CONTAINERS, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY, PACIFIC COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration after their lien was dismissed by the WCJ for failing to appear at a lien conference. The lien claimant argued they filed an objection and that dismissal for non-appearance was improper under Rule 10562. Although the petition was deemed timely filed as the claimant received the dismissal order late, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition due to procedural defects. Specifically, the petition was not properly served on adverse parties and lacked specific references to the record and applicable law as required by Board rules.

WCABlien claimantpetition for reconsiderationorder dismissing liennotice of intention to dismiss lienlien conferencefailure to appearobjectionserviceLabor Code section 5903
References
Case No. ADJ17611095; ADJ17611096
Regular
Feb 21, 2025

ALEXANDRYA WOLFE vs. CLAIRES AND STONINGTON INSURANCE CO, GALLAGHER BASSETT

Applicant Alexandrya Wolfe sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Order of Dismissal for inactivity in two cases (ADJ17611095, ADJ17611096). Applicant argued they were receiving medical care and were ready to proceed, having filed objections to both the defendant's petition to dismiss and the WCJ's notice of intention to dismiss. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition, answer, and WCJ's report. The Board determined that the WCJ erred by dismissing the cases without properly addressing applicant's objections or setting the matter for a hearing, thereby violating due process. Consequently, the Board granted the petition for reconsideration, rescinded the Orders of Dismissal, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.

WCAB Rule 10550Petition for ReconsiderationOrder of DismissalNotice of Intention to DismissLack of ProsecutionMedical TreatmentReady Willing AblePetition to Dismiss Inactive CaseMandatory Settlement ConferenceHearing Representative
References
Showing 1-10 of 5,353 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational