CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rowe v. Board of Education

Plaintiff sued Chatham Central School District Middle School for negligence after sustaining injuries from a fall in the school cafeteria, allegedly due to accumulated mud, water, and a lack of rain mats. The defendant School District subsequently impleaded the Chatham Central Teachers’ Association, claiming the Association was in control of the cafeteria and responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. Following a trial, the jury rendered a verdict of no cause for action in favor of both the School District and the Association. However, Special Term set aside this verdict and granted a new trial, based on evidence suggesting an accumulation of mud and water and the defendant's failure to provide janitorial services. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed Special Term's order, reinstating the original jury verdict, concluding that the jury's finding was not against the weight of the evidence given the conflicting testimony presented at trial.

NegligencePremises LiabilitySlip and FallJury VerdictWeight of EvidenceAppellate ReviewNew Trial Order ReversedSchool CafeteriaChatham Central School DistrictColumbia County
References
3
Case No. ADJ9194220 (MF) ADJ9194223
Regular
Feb 11, 2016

ALBERT BERNAL vs. ALLFAST FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC.

This case concerns an applicant's petition for removal from an order setting two workers' compensation cases for trial. The applicant argued the trial was improperly set due to timely objections, ongoing treatment, and defective readiness declarations, asserting prejudice. The WCJ's report recommended granting removal, acknowledging a need to review medical reports before setting trial. The Appeals Board granted removal, cancelled the trial, and ordered a new mandatory settlement conference to allow the judge to consider all evidence and arguments before deciding on a trial date.

Petition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedPermanent and StationaryPsychiatric InjuryOrthopedic InjuriesPrimary Treating PhysicianWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeTrial Exhibits
References
0
Case No. ADJ3502038 (VNO 0531200) ADJ3850322 (VNO 0531201)
Regular
Oct 21, 2010

MARIA DE LA LUZ PADILLA vs. SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, INC., HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Stipulations and Award (S&A) regarding applicant's neck, shoulder, and chest injuries. The defendant claimed mutual mistake and delays by applicant's attorney as grounds to set aside the S&A. However, the WCAB found these allegations insufficient to overturn the executed contract. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the defendant's separate petition to set aside the S&A, due to apparent procedural irregularities.

Stipulations and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition to Set AsideMutual Mistake of FactGood CauseDelay in ApprovalService of DocumentEthical BreachesTrial Level ProceedingsWorkers' Compensation Judge
References
2
Case No. ADJ10068763, ADJ10567862, ADJ10694876, ADJ10758465
Regular
Jul 03, 2016

NAHIDEH SARRAFIEH vs. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal due to a procedural error by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The WCJ erroneously set the case for trial after issuing a confusing "Notice of Hearing Cancellation" which led applicant's counsel to believe the hearing was cancelled. Despite applicant's counsel appearing and objecting, the WCJ proceeded to set the trial, failing to provide adequate notice. The Appeals Board rescinded the trial setting order and remanded the case for a new Mandatory Settlement Conference to ensure proper notice and preparation.

Petition for RemovalNotice of Hearing CancellationMandatory Settlement ConferenceDue ProcessObjectionsTrial SettingRescind OrderReturn for MSCWCJ OpinionAppeals Board Decision
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Saber v. 69th Tenants Corp.

The plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's denial of his motion to set aside a jury verdict concerning personal injuries under Labor Law § 240 (1) against 69th Tenants Corp. The jury had found a violation of the Labor Law but no proximate cause for the plaintiff's injuries, stemming from an incident where he fell from a wobbling ladder while removing a mirror from a ceiling. The appellate court agreed with the trial court that any defect in the ladder was not the proximate cause of the accident. However, the appellate court found that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on Labor Law § 240 (1) as it applies to falling objects, as the mirror's dislodging contributed to the fall. Consequently, the judgment is reversed, the complaint reinstated against 69th Tenants Corp., and the matter is remitted for a new trial on the issue of liability based on the falling object theory.

Personal InjuryLabor Law 240(1)Falling ObjectJury VerdictProximate CauseAppellate ReviewNew TrialLadder AccidentPremises LiabilityWorker Safety
References
18
Case No. ADJ7601492 ADJ7601927 ADJ7601929
Regular
Dec 09, 2020

MIGUEL ACEVES vs. HOFFMAN DAIRIES, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES

Here's a concise summary for a lawyer: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal, rescinded the trial setting order, and returned the case for further proceedings. A lien claimant sought removal, objecting to a trial on the application of Labor Code § 4615 to its lien. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, recommending a status conference to determine the parties' course of action regarding the disputed § 4615 issue and related procedural objections.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalLabor Code § 4615Lien ClaimantSan Joaquin Accident Medical GroupAbsolute Medical BillingEric ScottSpecial Adjudication UnitInformal Settlement AgreementInsurance Fraud
References
1
Case No. ADJ7620210
Regular
Feb 02, 2012

MATTHEW BROWN vs. PENINSULA PONTIAC AUTOMOBILE, AM TRUST NORTH AMERICA, MAJESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant insurance company sought removal of an order setting a workers' compensation case for trial, arguing insufficient discovery. The Board denied the petition, finding the defendant waived objections by failing to object to two prior Declarations of Readiness. The Board also noted the defendant's lack of diligence in obtaining requested discovery and the absence of extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay. The order allowing the trial judge discretion for limited medical evidence was upheld.

Petition for RemovalQualified Medical ExaminerDiscoveryMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeclaration of ReadinessObjectionTrialDepositionTemporary Total DisabilityDue Diligence
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Crawford v. Ehrlich

The court reversed an order denying a motion to vacate a notice of examination before trial, subsequently granting the motion. The examination sought information regarding $2,700 in U.S. Bonds and a $1,000 insurance policy, both payable or assigned to the executrix individually. The court found that the objectant had no legal interest in these assets as they were payable to a stated beneficiary and individually assigned to the executrix. Furthermore, the objectant was not a creditor, precluding examination under the Debtor and Creditor Law. Therefore, it was deemed an improvident exercise of discretion to permit the examination given the objectant's lack of a possible legal interest.

Motion to vacateNotice of examination before trialU.S. Bonds Series EInsurance policyDecedent's estateExecutrixObjectantDebtor and Creditor LawLegal interestDiscretionary power
References
1
Case No. ADJ1535496 (VNO 0558277)
Regular
Feb 06, 2012

MARIA GUTIERREZ vs. OAKDALE HEIGHTS MANAGEMENT, WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant petitioned for removal to object to an order setting trial, but later agreed to a Compromise and Release during trial. Defendant then withdrew its Petition for Removal, which the Board granted. The Board dismissed the petition without prejudice, allowing the WCJ to act on the C&R. If the C&R is rejected and trial is rescheduled, defendant may refile the petition.

Petition for RemovalCompromise and ReleaseWCJWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDismissalAdministrative Law JudgeApprovalRe-set for trialWithout prejudiceWausau Insurance Company
References
0
Case No. ADJ8162003
Regular
Dec 17, 2014

MARIA GUIZAR vs. CROWN PLAZA HOTEL, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, ULLICO CASUALTY COMPANY, PATRIOT RISK SERVICES

Defendant sought removal, arguing a trial date was set prematurely before a mandatory settlement conference. The Board reviewed the case and found the petition moot because the parties appeared for trial on the scheduled date and jointly requested the case be taken off calendar. The trial judge also effectively nullified the prior order the defendant objected to. Therefore, the Petition for Removal was dismissed as the issues raised were resolved.

Petition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceOrder Vacating JoinderWCJWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardMootStatus ConferenceTrial DateDiscoveryStipulations
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 7,241 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational