CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ4130207 (ANA 0407943)
Regular
Jan 14, 2013

ALEJANDRA ZATARAIN, aka WENDY OSUNA vs. onE SOURCE; ACE as administered by ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded an order dismissing lien claimant New Age Translations' lien. The dismissal occurred without notice to the lien claimant, and the Board found this procedurally improper. A subsequent agreement between parties settling the lien would have been meaningless if the dismissal remained in place. The Board's order allows the parties to resolve the lien in accordance with their agreement.

Lien DismissalPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantOrder of Lien DismissalNotice of Intent to DismissWCJRescindedSettlement AgreementAdministrative Law Judge
References
Case No. ADJ7711093
Regular
Nov 10, 2014

Fernando Sosa vs. Source One Staffing, CIGA by its Servicing Facility Patriot Risk Services, For Ullico, in liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was unverified. The Board also granted removal on its own motion due to the lien claimant's repeated failure to appear at lien conferences and file proper objections. This conduct, along with filing an invalid petition, suggests potential bad faith and warrants a Commissioner's Conference to determine if sanctions should be imposed. The lien claim was ultimately dismissed by the WCJ for non-appearance.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFernando SosaSource One StaffingCIGAUllicoPetition for ReconsiderationLien ClaimantCalifornia Physician NetworkLLCDenise Mejia
References
Case No. ADJ4306808 (AHM 0061728)
Regular
Dec 17, 2012

DEBRA CRAWFORD vs. GUIDANT CORPORATION, ONE BEACON INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied One Beacon Insurance Company's petition for reconsideration regarding applicant Debra Crawford's cumulative injury. The Board affirmed the earlier decision establishing August 22, 1996, as the date of injury, which shifts liability from CIGA to One Beacon. The Board found sufficient evidence to support the August 22, 1996 date, despite One Beacon's arguments. Finally, the Board upheld the finding of permanent total disability, relying on persuasive medical opinions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDate of InjuryLabor Code Section 5412Cumulative InjuryBilateral Upper ExtremitiesNeck InjuryPermanent Total DisabilityOne Beacon Insurance CompanyCalifornia Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA)
References
Case No. ADJ6603030
Regular
Jul 20, 2018

JEFF DEATON vs. SUPERIOR AMERICAN FLEET, U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision. The WCAB denied the petition, upholding a prior finding that one-on-one sitter services provided by a lien claimant were reasonable and necessary medical treatment. The defendant argued the WCJ erred in disregarding utilization review and a preferred provider organization agreement, but the WCAB found these arguments unpersuasive. The WCAB also noted the defendant waived the issue of a second review of medical bills by failing to raise it earlier.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderWCJlien claimantCare Meridianone-on-one sitter servicesreasonable and necessary medical treatmentpenaltyLabor Code 4603.2
References
Case No. ADJ3512839 (VNO 0509649)
Regular
Jul 27, 2010

KEIUNTA DIXON vs. APPLE ONE, ACE USA, Administered By ESIS, INC., AIG SUN AMERICA/NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, Administered By CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.

In *Dixon v. Apple One*, the defendant sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration due to statutory time constraints and the need for further review. This action allows for a more thorough examination of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just decision. The Board will subsequently issue a Decision After Reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardGranting ReconsiderationStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersFrank M. BrassAlfonso U. Moresi
References
Case No. ADJ7774238
Regular
Dec 05, 2013

MIRIAM PANTOJA vs. PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Payless Shoe Source, administered by Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was filed **untimely**. Specifically, the petition was filed more than 25 days after the original Findings were issued on September 13, 2013, exceeding the statutory 20-day filing deadline plus mailing extensions. Therefore, the Board found the petition procedurally deficient and dismissed it.

Petition for ReconsiderationuntimelydismissFindingsadministrative law judgeReport and RecommendationLabor Code section 5903Code of Civil Procedure section 1013mailingWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
Case No. VNO 0518591
Regular
Feb 13, 2008

DOREEN WARD vs. APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, ESIS, INC.

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the administrative law judge's (WCJ) dismissal of Apple One and ESIS, finding the dismissal was improper without a hearing. The WCJ improperly treated the defendants' petition for dismissal as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, violating procedural rules and due process. The case is returned to the WCJ for actual proceedings on the dismissal petitions and any objections.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardDoreen WardApple One Employment ServicesESIS Inc.Labor Code section 3208.3(d)psychiatric injuryhostile work environmentpetition for dismissaldue processsection 5813
References
Case No. ADJ7162019
Regular
Aug 13, 2010

Abraham Avila vs. Victory Outreach San Bernardino, Guide One Ins. Co.

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the defendant, Victory Outreach San Bernardino, and its insurer, Guide One Ins. Co. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted this petition. The Board determined that reconsideration is necessary to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Further proceedings may be held pending the issuance of a Decision After Reconsideration.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationVICTORY OUTREACH SAN BERNARDINOGUIDE ONE INS. CO.ABRAHAM AVILAOPINION AND ORDERGRANTING PETITIONSTATUTORY TIME CONSTRAINTSFACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUESJUST AND REASONED DECISION
References
Case No. SFO 0470429
Regular
Aug 31, 2007

ABDO M. ALKORIN vs. ONE SOURCE and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed over 10 months late. The WCAB clarified that a prior order incorrectly included one case number in a dismissal and properly corrected this clerical error, finding the applicant was not aggrieved by the correction. Since an order taking the matter off calendar is not a final order and no prejudice was shown, removal was also denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalRemovalAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorOff CalendarDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedNotice of Intention to DismissMandatory Settlement Conference
References
Showing 1-10 of 672 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational