CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ4387448 (SJO 0267422)
Regular
Mar 11, 2014

BALGOVIND SHARMA vs. LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT

The Court of Appeal ordered a supplemental attorney's fee award for applicant's counsel for successfully defending against the defendant's petition for writ of review. The Board reviewed the attorney's claimed hours and rate, deeming some time entries excessive and clerical tasks non-compensable. Ultimately, the Board awarded $5,480.00 in attorney's fees plus $47.74 in costs, totaling $5,527.74, and clarified this award is in addition to any compensation owed. The Board also rejected the defendant's argument that the third-party credit applied to this supplemental fee award.

Labor Code § 5801Supplemental Attorney's FeePetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of Appeal RemandApplicant's AttorneyReasonable Attorney FeesHourly RateTime and EffortCase ComplexityClerical Tasks
References
2
Case No. SAL 104703
Regular
Mar 14, 2008

GONZALEZ vs. GILROY FOODS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case concerns a supplemental award of attorney's fees under Labor Code § 5801 following the denial of a defendant's petition for writ of review. The Court of Appeal found no reasonable basis for the petition and remanded the case for the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award fees for services rendered in connection with that petition. The WCAB affirmed the award of attorney's fees, clarifying that the WCJ lacks jurisdiction to approve fees under § 5801, which is the sole province of the WCAB upon remand.

Labor Code § 5801Petition for Writ of ReviewSupplemental AwardAttorney's FeesRemandWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCourt of AppealStipulation and AwardWCJFindings Order and Award
References
1
Case No. ADJ3999556 (STK 0205067)
Regular
Aug 16, 2016

MARTIN ORNELAS vs. BEUTLER CORPORATION, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of the defendant's writ of review, finding no reasonable basis for the petition and remanding for attorney's fees. Applicant's attorney sought $6,000 based on 15 hours of work, which the defendant contested due to a procedural argument. The Board reviewed the filings and found the requested fee award reasonable. Consequently, the defendant is ordered to pay applicant's attorney $6,000 for services related to the appellate proceedings.

Labor Code Section 5801Petition for Writ of ReviewAttorney's FeesReasonable BasisRemandApplicant's AttorneyDefendant's AnswerAppellate Court DocketVerified PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
0
Case No. ADJ7479879
Regular
Feb 21, 2014

Gregory Foster vs. Toronto Raptors, Chubb Group Insurance (Federal Insurance Company), Milwaukee Bucks, Los Angeles Lakers, TIG Insurance Company

This case involves a remand from the Court of Appeal for the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award additional attorney fees to the applicant's attorneys. The Court of Appeal's order, which has become final, was based on services rendered in connection with the defendant's petition for a writ of review. The WCAB determined that $3,500.00 is a reasonable fee, considering the attorney's efforts, the appellate outcome, and the complexity of the work. Consequently, the Board awarded this amount for appellate attorney fees against the defendant Toronto Raptors, insured by Federal Insurance Company.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code § 5801Petition for Writ of Reviewappellate attorney's feessupplemental awardremandCourt of AppealFourth Appellate DistrictDivision 3Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Rodriguez)
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 16, 1990

Continental Building Co. v. Town of North Salem

This case concerns an amended order regarding the award of attorney's fees under 42 USC § 1988. The court re-affirmed its previous finding that the plaintiff was a 'prevailing party' and that no 'special circumstances' existed to deny the award, rejecting arguments regarding defendants' good faith, plaintiff's financial ability, or third-party contributions. The court then determined the reasonableness of the fees, finding the hours expended and the hourly rate to be appropriate. Despite the 'lodestar fee' calculation, the court, exercising its discretion, reduced the final award to prevent overpricing litigation, ultimately granting $318,977.78 in attorney's fees and $73,022.22 in disbursements and expenses.

Civil RightsAttorney's FeesPrevailing PartySpecial CircumstancesLodestar MethodDisbursementsExpert Witness FeesSection 1983Section 1988Exclusionary Zoning
References
32
Case No. ADJ1978559
Regular
Feb 03, 2017

JACKIE ABRAMIAN vs. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER

The Court of Appeal ordered the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award attorney's fees to applicant's counsel for successfully defending against the defendant's petition for writ of review. The applicant's counsel sought $4,850.00 in fees and $141.87 in costs. Both parties stipulated to these amounts as reasonable. The WCAB has now issued an award for these additional attorney's fees and costs, payable to applicant's counsel, Scott B. Solis.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDGlendale Adventist Medical CenterOpinion and AwardAttorney's FeesPetition for Writ of ReviewLabor Code section 5801Labor Code section 5811RemandStipulationAppellate Attorney's Fees
References
1
Case No. ADJ6773331 ADJ7296677
Regular
Dec 11, 2015

REHAN NAZIR vs. CITY OF TORRANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TORRANCE

This case involves a remand from the Court of Appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) for the award of attorney's fees. Applicant's counsel successfully responded to the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review, prompting the appellate court's order. The parties have stipulated to a reasonable fee of $10,000 for these appellate services. The WCAB has issued an award of this $10,000 in additional attorney's fees to the Law Offices of Lawrence R. Whiting, payable to the applicant's counsel in addition to any other compensation.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRehan NazirCity of Torrance Police DepartmentADJ6773331ADJ7296677Long Beach District OfficeOpinion and AwardAdditional Attorney's FeesLabor Code § 5801Labor Code § 5811
References
1
Case No. ADJ3584368 (AHM 0049668)
Regular
May 15, 2013

STEVE GIANNINI vs. CITY OF IRVINE

This case involves a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision concerning attorney's fees. Following a Court of Appeal order to award fees for responding to the defendant's writ of review, the parties stipulated to $3,547.12. The Board has accepted this stipulation. An award is therefore made in favor of applicant's counsel, Leonard Stern, against the City of Irvine for this appellate attorney's fee. This fee is in addition to any compensation otherwise payable to the applicant.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTEVE GIANNINICITY OF IRVINECORVEL INSURANCE COMPANYADJ3584368ADJ2266028ADJ4420242ADJ4296333ADJ1443533ADJ814285
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

King v. Allied Vision, Ltd.

This case involves a plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees following a remand from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff Stephen King sought fees due to defendant New Line Cinema's contempt of court for numerous violations of a Final Consent Decree concerning the misattribution of 'The Lawnmower Man' film. The District Court had previously found the defendant in contempt and awarded fees in 1994 and 1995. The Second Circuit affirmed some parts of the 1994 order but vacated others, along with the entire 1995 order, remanding the attorney's fees issue for reconsideration, specifically questioning the willfulness of the noncompliance. Upon review, this court concluded that while the defendant's conduct was negligent and contumacious, it did not meet the clear and convincing evidence standard for willfulness required for an award of attorney's fees for civil contempt under Second Circuit law. Consequently, the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees was denied.

Civil ContemptAttorney's FeesWillfulness StandardSecond Circuit RemandConsent Decree ViolationsLanham ActFilm MisattributionThe Lawnmower ManInjunctive ReliefCompensatory Damages
References
27
Case No. ADJ4445992 (MON 0029719)\nADJ887768 (MON 0029718)
Regular
Mar 30, 2017

BERNARD BILLIK vs. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANY

The Court of Appeal ordered the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award applicant's attorney's fees for responding to a denied petition for writ of review. The applicant's counsel and the defendant's insurer subsequently stipulated to attorney's fees and costs totaling $6,492.50. The WCAB found this amount reasonable and issued an award for these fees and costs against Wausau Insurance Company, payable in addition to any compensation owed to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAttorney's FeesLabor Code § 5801Petition for Writ of ReviewRemandStipulationAppellate Attorney's FeesWausau Insurance CompanyHughes Aircraft CompanyLiberty Mutual Insurance Company
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 27,654 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational