CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9202952
Regular
Nov 05, 2018

MARIA LOPEZ vs. KELLERMEYER BERGENSON SERVICES, LLC, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The WCAB dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Order Vacating, finding the order was not a final decision. However, it granted the defendant's Petition for Removal of that same Order Vacating, deeming it untimely under WCAB Rule 10859. Consequently, the WCAB vacated the Order Vacating, restoring the original July 5, 2018 Findings of Fact. The WCAB also dismissed the lien claimant's Petition for Removal, affirming the July 5, 2018 Findings of Fact which held the lien claimant bound by prior causation findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder VacatingFindings of FactAdministrative Law JudgeLien ClaimantSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmFinal Order
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Orth v. Coffey

Kenneth Orth initiated a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries. The Supreme Court, Queens County, granted Orth’s application to vacate the workers’ compensation lien of Firemen’s Insurance Company and denied Firemen’s cross motion to dismiss. On appeal, the order was reversed. The appellate court denied Orth’s motion to vacate Firemen’s lien and granted Firemen’s cross motion to dismiss, citing Workers’ Compensation Law § 29(1) which provides an absolute lien to a compensation carrier on third-party recoveries despite no-fault provisions in the Insurance Law. The court distinguished the case from Grello v Daszykowski, noting that Firemen and Allstate Insurance Company (the no-fault carrier) were not the same entity. The decision was made without prejudice to plaintiffs pursuing proceedings against Allstate Insurance Company as the no-fault carrier.

NegligencePersonal InjuryWorkers' Compensation LienNo-Fault InsuranceThird-Party ActionInsurance LawMotor Vehicle AccidentLien VacaturAppellate ReviewStatutory Interpretation
References
2
Case No. ADJ6711975
Regular
Aug 05, 2013

DIONICIO REYES vs. FILOMENA D'AMORE, FIRSTCOMP OMAHA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition to vacate an order dismissing their lien for failure to pay an activation fee. The petition was untimely, filed 59 days after the order was served. The Board also granted removal on its own motion to issue a notice of intention to impose sanctions due to the petition's untimeliness and multiple misrepresentations of fact. The Board is considering imposing a $500 sanction against the lien claimant's representative.

Lien ClaimantPetition to Vacate OrderLien Activation FeeLabor Code section 4903.06Untimely PetitionRemoval on Own MotionNotice of Intention to Impose SanctionsLabor Code section 5813Misrepresented Material FactsWCAB Rule 10842(a)
References
0
Case No. ADJ9668991
Regular
Dec 22, 2017

SALVADOR VARGAS, vs. EXCEL STAFFING, SOUTHEAST PERSONNEL LEASING, INC., STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PACKARD CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of an order vacating a Notice of Intent to dismiss a lien, finding it was not a final order. The Board granted the Petition for Removal, rescinded the September 29, 2017 order, and returned the matter to the trial level. This action was taken because the lien had already been dismissed by a prior order on August 15, 2017, making the subsequent order to vacate it erroneous. However, the Board noted the lien claimant's assertion of an automatic stay under Labor Code section 4615 due to alleged fraud charges, which, if proven, would render the August 15, 2017 dismissal void.

Salvador VargasExcel StaffingSoutheast Personnel LeasingState National Insurance CompanyPackard Claims AdministrationCalifornia Imaging Beverly HillsWCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Dismissing Lien
References
9
Case No. ADJ1035201
Regular
Oct 04, 2016

VICTOR DURAN vs. DONUT INN, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board is considering rescinding an order that dismissed Metro Med Shockwave's lien claim for failure to pay a $\$100$ lien activation fee. The WCJ dismissed the lien because the fee was not paid before the lien conference, citing prior precedent. However, the lien claimant argues they had until December 31, 2015, to pay the fee based on a DWC Newsline article referencing a court order. The Board intends to rescind the dismissal if the fee is paid within ten days, allowing further proceedings on the lien claim.

Labor Code section 4903.06Lien activation feeWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardMetro Med ShockwaveFigueroa v. B.C Doering Co.Angelotti Chiropractic v. BakerPreliminary injunctionDWC NewslineReconsiderationRescind order
References
2
Case No. ADJ6720678
Regular
Aug 14, 2015

RAQUEL MEEK vs. KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a defendant's attempt to appeal a WCJ's decision to rescind dismissal orders for lien claims. The Appeals Board vacated its own order granting reconsideration because the defendant's petition was not for a final order. The Board also dismissed the defendant's removal petition as untimely, as it was filed over two months past the deadline following the rescission order. Furthermore, the defendant failed to provide proper proof of personal service, leading the Board to uphold the lien claimants' reliance on the later mail service date.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalLien ClaimsDismissalRescissionLabor Code section 4903.06Appeals Board Rule 10859Appeals Board Rule 10848Appeals Board Rule 10505(c)
References
5
Case No. ADJ7813636
Regular
Oct 28, 2013

RAMONA GARNICA vs. ESPARZA ENTERPRISES

Willow Medical Group sought reconsideration of a dismissed lien, alleging it had paid all required fees. However, the administrative law judge (WCJ) reported no order dismissing the lien on the date cited by Willow. Since reconsideration is only available for final orders and no such order exists in the record, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Willow's petition. The lien claimant's prior dismissal order had already been vacated by the WCJ.

Lien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationDismissed lienOrder to DismissVacated orderCompromise and ReleaseWCJ ReportEAMS recordProcedural historySubstantive right
References
2
Case No. ADJ7541189
Regular
Jul 22, 2013

MARIA DEL CARMEN POSADA vs. MICHAEL JOSEPH FURIE SALON, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY

This case involves a lien claimant seeking reconsideration of an order dismissing its lien. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because the claimant was not a party to the case in which the order was issued, therefore it was not aggrieved by the order. The Board noted procedural issues with the original order's service and the judge's subsequent attempt to vacate it. However, the dismissal of the petition for reconsideration stands, and the lien claimant may still pursue its claim in the proper case or file a new lien.

Petition for ReconsiderationLien ClaimantWCJ OrderLabor Code Section 5900Aggrieved PartyCompromise and ReleaseLien ConferenceADJ NumbersWCABVacate Order
References
0
Case No. ADJ6677451
Regular
Dec 24, 2013

ANTONIO VALENZUELA vs. MCCALL'S NURSERIES, INC.; HORTICA INSURANCE & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, finding the WCJ improperly vacated earlier orders dismissing lien claims. The WCJ lacked authority to act after an untimely lien claimant petition for reconsideration. Therefore, the Board rescinded the WCJ's order vacating the lien dismissals.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Vacating Lien DismissalsLien Activation FeeMandatory Settlement ConferenceDue ProcessUltra ViresWCAB Rule 10500(b)WCAB Rule 10859
References
4
Case No. ADJ4522242 (VNO 0452421) ADJ522765 (VNO 0452422)
Regular
May 26, 2011

PAUL ALLGOOD vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted lien claimant's petition for removal to rescind an Administrative Law Judge's order compelling Dr. Baden's appearance at trial. The Board found no good cause was established for Dr. Baden's direct examination and that the order was not a final, appealable decision. Removal was granted to prevent prejudice to the lien claimant, and the order for Dr. Baden's appearance was rescinded. The Board also dismissed the lien claimant's prior petition for reconsideration.

Lien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalWCJ OrderDr. Scott BadenGood CauseMedical WitnessDirect ExaminationWritten ReportsBoard Rule 10606
References
11
Showing 1-10 of 28,521 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational