CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ6528393
Regular
May 18, 2012

OFELIA SALCEDO vs. P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, CHUBB GROUP

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's award, and returned the matter for further proceedings. This was because the Board found that neither the treating physician's reports nor the QME's report constituted substantial evidence to support the original award. The Board requires further development of the record, potentially through re-evaluations with both physicians, to properly assess the applicant's permanent disability. Therefore, the defendant's contentions regarding evidentiary issues are currently moot.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOfelia SalcedoP.F. Chang's China BistroChubb GroupReconsiderationFindings Orders and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeIndustrial InjuryLeft HandFourth and Fifth Digits
References
Case No. ADJ8750816
Regular
Jul 31, 2014

KAMIKA BEASLEY vs. SECURITAS, SEDGWICK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, reversing the prior denial of a change of venue. The applicant demonstrated good cause by residing in Vallejo, her injury occurring in Sacramento, and no longer having an attorney in the original Anaheim venue. Therefore, the case venue was changed to the Oakland district office, and the trial was continued.

Petition for RemovalChange of VenueWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardPresiding Workers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgePetition to Change VenuePetition for Change of VenueGood CauseMandatory Settlement ConferenceApplication for Adjudication of ClaimIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ11509125, ADJ11509591, ADJ13194436
Regular
Dec 15, 2020

ALEX MEJIA vs. LINEAGE LOGISTICS, CORVEL

The Appeals Board granted Lineage Logistics' petition for removal, rescinding an order that changed venue for claim ADJ13194436 to Long Beach. The Board found the record procedurally confused, noting conflicting actions by different district offices and an order that incorrectly stated parties jointly agreed to the venue change despite an objection. The matter is returned to the trial level to address consolidation and proper venue for all three applicant claims.

Petition for RemovalChange of VenueConsolidation of ClaimsProcedural ConfusionAdjudication NumbersDistrict OfficeWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCumulative TraumaPetition to ConsolidateNotice of Intention to Change Venue
References
Case No. ADJ10149777
Regular
Dec 31, 2015

TIMOTHY PRATT vs. SOUTHERN MARIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for removal, upholding a prior order changing the venue from Oakland to Redding. The change was granted because the applicant resides in Grass Valley, and the Redding District Office is the closest Appeals Board office to that location. The applicant failed to demonstrate factual prejudice stemming from the venue change. Therefore, the original venue change order is affirmed.

Petition for RemovalVenue ChangeLabor Code Section 5501.5Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeOakland District OfficeRedding District OfficeApplicant ResidenceAttorney Principal Place of BusinessCumulative Trauma
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ564696
Regular
Mar 01, 2010

JESSE MILES (Deceased) vs. CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES COMMERCE

The Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, which sought to retroactively change the permanent and stationary (P&S) date from October 16, 2006, to March 25, 2003, based on an industrial orthopedic injury. The Board affirmed the prior finding that the P&S date was October 16, 2006, as stipulated by the parties, and that the applicant was adequately compensated for temporary disability. While the applicant died before the reconsideration, Labor Code section 4700 does not mandate changing the P&S date for accrued benefits. Therefore, the Board found no good cause to disturb the stipulation regarding the P&S date.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardJesse MilesCalifornia State Department of CorrectionsSCIF State Employees CommerceOpinion and Order Denying Petition for ReconsiderationPermanent Disability AwardPulmonary EmbolismNon-IndustrialPermanent and Stationary (P&S) DateIndustrial Orthopedic Injury
References
Case No. ADJ3867943 [SFO 0511706] ADJ 1789690 [SFO 0511707]
Regular
Sep 03, 2008

DOUGLAS MUNYER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES (Adjusting Agent)

The WCAB granted the defendants' petition for removal, rescinding a prior order that denied a change of venue. The Board found the judge's subsequent order changing venue was void due to exceeding jurisdictional time limits. However, the Board then exercised its removal power to grant the venue change to Sacramento.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Denying Change of VenuePresiding Workers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeLabor Code Section 5310WCAB Rule 10843WCAB Rule 10859Interlocutory orderFinal order
References
Case No. ADJ10962162
Regular
May 17, 2018

ANNA MONTANARO vs. KEY CODE MEDIA, INC., HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration because the order changing venue was not a final decision. The WCAB granted a petition for removal and rescinded the order changing venue to investigate whether the defendant received proper notice and an opportunity to object to the venue change. This due process concern arose because there was no proof of service for the notice of intent to change venue. The matter was returned to the Presiding WCJ for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Changing VenueNotice of Intent to Change VenueDue ProcessProof of ServiceInterlocutory OrderFinal OrderSubstantive Right
References
Case No. ADJ7056249
Regular
Jun 29, 2012

OSVALDO GONZALEZ vs. FLOOR PLANS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The WCAB dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration as premature. However, the Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinded the prior order changing venue, and returned the matter for a hearing. The original Order Granting Change of Venue lacked sufficient factual basis showing good cause for the transfer. The WCAB requires a hearing to properly address the defendant's opposition and for the WCJ to articulate specific good cause for any venue change.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalChange of VenueGood CauseWCJLabor Code section 5501.6Order Granting Change of VenueRescindedDecision After Removal
References
Case No. ADJ11099310
Regular
Mar 19, 2018

TYLER SANCHEZ vs. THE JACMAR COMPANIES dba SHAKEY'S PIZZA; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order denying a change of venue was not a final order, and thus not subject to reconsideration. The Petition for Removal was denied because the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Furthermore, the defendant's failure to file a proof of service with its initial petition and its failure to serve the applicant on the venue change request were grounds for denial. Even with a late submission of proof of service, the failure to serve the applicant on the venue change petition was a fatal defect.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalChange of VenueProof of ServiceLabor Code Section 5501.5(c)WCAB Rule 10450(f)Non-final OrderSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable Harm
References
Showing 1-10 of 878 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational