CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Martin v. Clinical Pathology Laboratories, Inc.

Appellant Joyce Martin sued Clinical Pathology Laboratories, Inc. (CPL) for wrongful termination, alleging she was fired for leaving work early to vote. The trial court dismissed her case, and Martin appealed. The appellate court first addressed Martin's standing to sue, concluding that despite filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, she retained standing as her claim revested in her upon the confirmation of her bankruptcy plan. On the merits, Martin argued for a new common-law exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, citing Texas public policy and the Texas Election Code. However, the appellate court declined to create such an exception, emphasizing the legislature's role in defining exceptions to the at-will doctrine and noting that Martin's pleadings did not definitively show a violation of the Election Code. Consequently, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment of dismissal.

wrongful terminationemployment at willright to voteTexas Election Codepublic policy exceptionChapter 13 bankruptcystandingappellate reviewcase dismissalemployer retaliation
References
42
Case No. 08-19-00067-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 06, 2020

Clinical Pathology Laboratories Inc. v. Juan Polo

This case involves an appeal concerning the application of the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) in a wrongful discharge lawsuit. Clinical Pathology Laboratories (CPL) terminated employee Juan Polo after he suffered a work-related injury and filed a worker's compensation claim. Polo sued CPL for retaliatory discharge under Chapter 451 of the Texas Labor Code. CPL filed a motion to dismiss under the TCPA, arguing Polo's claims were based on its exercise of free speech and right of association regarding matters of public concern (health and safety related to its lab services). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of CPL's motion, concluding that Polo's lawsuit was based on CPL's conduct of termination, not specific communications, and that CPL failed to show the communications related to a matter of public concern as distinct from its private pecuniary interests.

Workers' CompensationRetaliatory DischargeTexas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA)Free SpeechRight of AssociationPublic ConcernPrivate DisputeEmployment LawAppealEl Paso
References
40
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 23, 1994

Johnson v. El Paso Pathology Group, P.A.

Plaintiff Deborah A. Johnson, a pathologist, sued El Paso Pathology Group, P.A. and El Paso Healthcare System, Ltd. d/b/a Sun Towers Hospital for sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court found that Johnson's sex was a motivating factor in her termination, rejecting the defendants' arguments that her personality or refusal to transfer justified the action. The decision also established that the defendants were 'joint employers' under federal law, despite state law restrictions on physician employment. Johnson was awarded $454,401 in damages, including back pay and front pay, along with attorney's fees and costs.

Employment DiscriminationSex DiscriminationTitle VIIJoint Employer DoctrineWrongful TerminationBack Pay AwardFront Pay AwardAttorney's FeesJudicial DiscretionFifth Circuit Precedent
References
31
Case No. ADJ1220987 (SJO 0262634)
Regular
Nov 17, 2010

RICHARD GILLISPIE vs. PLASTECH, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) appealed an award of benefits to an applicant with a pre-existing disability, arguing a subsequent industrial back injury did not cause pathology in the opposite leg as required by statute. The Appeals Board affirmed the award, finding that Labor Code section 4751 only requires the subsequent injury to "affect" the opposite member, not necessarily cause direct pathology. Evidence showed the applicant's low back injury caused verified radiculopathy and impaired leg function, meeting the statutory requirement. The Board found SIBTF's legal arguments unpersuasive and the WCJ's findings supported by substantial evidence.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundLabor Code section 4751industrial injurylow backradiculopathypermanent disabilityopposite and corresponding memberpathologyAMA GuidesDRE category III
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Storch v. Syracuse University

Plaintiffs Mark and Jenny Storch sued Syracuse University and Professor Douglas Biklen after their autistic daughter, Jenny, allegedly accused her father of sexual abuse through "facilitated communication." A Family Court had previously rejected this communication method as unreliable, leading to the withdrawal of abuse charges against Mark Storch. The state court action alleged fraud and violations of Education Law regarding speech-language pathology. The court granted summary judgment to the defendants, ruling that Biklen's statements were opinions on an evolving, controversial theory, not fraudulent misrepresentations, and that facilitated communication does not fall under the practice of speech-language pathology as defined by law. Consequently, the plaintiffs' complaint was dismissed.

Facilitated CommunicationAutism CommunicationChild Abuse AllegationsSummary JudgmentFraud ClaimsEducation LawSpeech-Language PathologyScientific ControversyExpert TestimonyAcademic Liability
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

United States v. Yi Ching Liu

The case concerns defendant Yi Ching Liu, who was charged with using unauthorized credit card convenience checks and pled guilty. Liu sought a downward departure from sentencing guidelines, claiming diminished capacity due to pathological gambling addiction. Expert testimony from psychotherapist Stephen Block, supported by DSM IV criteria, confirmed Liu's severe addiction and a direct link to his criminal acts. The court, presided over by Senior District Judge Weinstein, granted a four-point downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13, resulting in a 24-month incarceration sentence. The decision emphasizes that pathological gambling can constitute significantly reduced mental capacity for sentencing purposes, citing precedent and the evolving understanding of this disorder.

Diminished CapacityPathological GamblingSentencing GuidelinesDownward DepartureImpulse Control DisorderFraudCredit Card FraudCriminal SentencingDSM IVFederal Court
References
5
Case No. ADJ9813548
Regular
Feb 03, 2016

ANDREA LOPEZ ROCHA vs. BAKERSFIELD PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, WILLIAMSBURG NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied defendant's petition for removal. Defendant sought removal of an order allowing applicant to obtain vocational rehabilitation reports and depose experts, arguing it caused prejudice. The WCAB found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the defendant, noting these issues could be addressed at trial or reconsideration. The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision to allow limited, timely discovery to move the case forward.

Petition for RemovalInterlocutory OrderVocational RehabilitationMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscovery ClosureSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmPanel Qualified Medical EvaluationDeclaration of ReadinessAdministrative Law Judge
References
8
Case No. ADJ3625409 (SAL 0119152)
Regular
Sep 21, 2009

GUADALUPE BENAVIDES vs. SALINAS VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By ACCLAMATION INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the prior award. The WCJ incorrectly ruled that surgical knee replacement precluded apportionment of permanent disability. The Board found that Labor Code § 4663 requires apportionment based on causation, even if the contributing pathology is surgically removed. Therefore, the matter was returned for a new rating based on the QME's opinion that 75% of the applicant's permanent disability was due to pre-existing conditions.

ApportionmentPermanent DisabilityQualified Medical EvaluatorIndustrial InjuryNon-IndustrialPrevious InjuriesDegenerative ArthritisTotal Knee ReplacementLabor Code § 4663Causation
References
4
Case No. SRO 0277261
Regular
Aug 10, 2007

Luis M. Mariscal vs. Blakeley Construction, State Compensation Insurance Fund

This case involves a workers' compensation claim for a back injury where the defendant seeks reconsideration of the permanent disability rating. The core issue is whether to apportion a portion of the disability to the applicant's pre-existing pathological condition, despite the evaluating physician's potentially contradictory opinion. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and returned the matter for a new rating consistent with apportionment principles established in recent case law.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationApportionmentPermanent DisabilityQualified Medical EvaluatorLabor Code section 4663CausationSubstantial Medical EvidenceGattenEscobedo
References
3
Case No. ADJ2329367 (OAK 0323054)
Regular
May 06, 2013

JOSEPH VALTIERRA vs. TCB INDUSTRIAL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's award due to inadequate medical evidence regarding the applicant's left shoulder injury. Both the applicant's and defendant's medical evaluators provided opinions that were found to be speculative, incomplete, and not based on a full understanding of the underlying pathology. The Board determined that substantial evidence was lacking on the apportionment of disability and the precise nature of the left shoulder condition. The case is returned to the trial level for further development of the medical record.

Compensable consequenceApportionmentSubstantial evidenceMedical opinionReasonable medical probabilityUnderlying pathologyLeft shoulder injuryRight shoulder injuryMillwrightCumulative trauma
References
11
Showing 1-10 of 38 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational