CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2015-01-0149
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 04, 2016

Ringer, Lamar v. Welding Ceramics, Inc.

Lamar Ringer, a press operator, injured his neck, left shoulder, and arm at Welding Ceramics, Inc. on November 19, 2014. He sought treatment, including from orthopedic surgeon Dr. Jay E. Jolley, II, who diagnosed a large C5/C6 disc herniation and recommended surgery, which Ringer declined. Dr. Jolley rated Ringer's impairment at 6% to the whole body and released him to regular duty, but Ringer experienced increased pain upon returning to work. Another physician, Dr. Jerry L. Smith, rated Ringer's impairment at 10% and placed permanent restrictions. The court found Dr. Jolley's impairment rating methodology incorrect due to documented radicular symptoms and accepted Dr. Smith's 10% rating, awarding permanent partial disability benefits. The court denied additional temporary disability benefits, finding Ringer reached maximum medical improvement, and also denied his request for a new treating physician panel.

Permanent Partial DisabilityImpairment RatingAMA Guides Sixth EditionRadiculopathyDisc HerniationAuthorized Treating PhysicianRebuttal of PresumptionTemporary Disability BenefitsChange of Physician PanelFunctional Capacity Evaluation
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Martone v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority-Metro

In 2005 and 2007, a bus driver (claimant) suffered work-related neck and back injuries. Initially, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found him permanently totally disabled. However, the Workers’ Compensation Board modified this, determining he had a permanent partial disability with a 75% loss of wage-earning capacity based on medical evidence and other factors. The claimant appealed this decision, arguing a lack of substantial evidence for the partial disability finding. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, noting medical reports indicating submaximal efforts, high medication dosages, symptom magnification, and the ability to ambulate, which supported the finding of partial disability. The court also upheld the 75% loss of wage-earning capacity, finding it supported by substantial evidence after considering the claimant's impairment, work restrictions, age, education, and work experience.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWage-Earning CapacityChronic Pain SyndromeLumbar Spine SurgeryMedical EvidenceSubmaximal EffortsSymptom MagnificationAppellate ReviewBoard DecisionMedical Treatment Guidelines
References
2
Case No. 2019-07-0251
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 02, 2020

Hayes, Michael v. Jackson Golf & Country Club

Mr. Hayes, a tennis professional, sustained a right shoulder injury while serving. Dr. Pucek, the authorized treating physician, initially rated a two-percent permanent impairment to the body as a whole, later increasing it to three percent. Dr. Samuel Chung, an IME physician, assessed a six-percent impairment based on range of motion. The Court found Dr. Chung's rating more accurate, citing his detailed measurements and Mr. Hayes's credible lay testimony regarding lost service velocity and reduced work hours. The Court ordered Jackson Golf & Country Club to pay Mr. Hayes $23,976 in permanent partial disability benefits.

Permanent Partial DisabilityShoulder InjuryTennis ProfessionalImpairment RatingRange of MotionMedical ExaminerTreating PhysicianCredibilityWork InjuryWage Loss
References
6
Case No. 2016-01-0035 / 67325-2014
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 07, 2017

Findley, Jack v. Volswagen Group of America, Inc.

This case involves an employee, Jack Keith Findley, who sustained a back injury while working for Volkswagen. He sought temporary and additional permanent partial disability benefits, leading to a dispute over his impairment rating, maximum medical improvement date, and the compensability of his condition. The Court of Workers' Compensation Claims sided with Mr. Findley, awarding him the requested disability benefits and future medical care under Dr. Jolley, based on Dr. Hodges' medical opinion regarding his work-related injury and functional limitations. The court also allowed Volkswagen to offset short-term disability payments.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityTemporary Partial DisabilityMedical BenefitsImpairment RatingMaximum Medical ImprovementVoluntary ResignationMedical Opinion ConflictBack InjuryLumbar Disc Herniation
References
5
Case No. 2017-08-0024
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 19, 2020

Thomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.

Alisha Thomas filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) seeking permanent total disability benefits or additional permanent partial benefits, which Federal Express Corp. disputed. The Court ruled that Ms. Thomas is entitled to increased permanent partial disability benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(3)(B) because she had not returned to work by the expiration of her initial compensation period, and her treating physician, Dr. Melvin Goldin, attributed her condition to the work injury at that time. However, the Court denied claims for additional benefits under section 50-6-242 and permanent total disability, as Dr. Goldin's later testimony revealed Ms. Thomas's condition had evolved beyond the initial somatic symptom disorder, and he could not definitively connect her advanced symptoms to the work injury at the time of the award. The awarded increased benefits totaled $3,379.01.

Permanent Partial DisabilitySomatic Symptom DisorderImpairment RatingRes JudicataMental Injury CompensabilityIncreased BenefitsSocial Security DisabilityTreating Physician TestimonyCausation StandardSettlement Agreement
References
5
Case No. 2018-07-0217
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 23, 2018

Slayton, Ruth v. Community Health Systems

Ruth Ann Slayton, an employee of Community Health Systems, sustained a neck injury on February 4, 2016, while lifting a patient, leading to pain and weakness in her right arm. Following unsuccessful conservative treatment and surgery performed by Dr. Laverne Lovell, a dispute arose regarding the extent of her permanent partial disability. Dr. Lovell assessed a six-percent impairment, while Dr. Samuel Chung, after an independent medical evaluation, found a fifteen-percent impairment due to residual radiculopathy. The Court favored Dr. Chung's more detailed methodology and clinical findings, granting Ms. Slayton permanent partial disability benefits of $45,281.70 and future medical benefits.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWorkers' Compensation ClaimRadiculopathy DiagnosisImpairment RatingsMedical TestimonyAMA GuidesTreating Physician OpinionIndependent Medical ExaminerSpinal SurgeryNeck Injury
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Middleton v. Allegheny Electric Co.

This workers' compensation appeal addressed the calculation of permanent partial impairment benefits. The Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel reviewed a trial court's award of 75 percent permanent partial impairment. The Panel determined that the award must be limited to six times the medical impairment rating, as per Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-241(b), because the plaintiff failed to present clear and convincing evidence to meet the exceptions outlined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-242. Consequently, the Panel modified the judgment, reducing the award to 36 percent permanent partial impairment to the body as a whole.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial ImpairmentMedical ImpairmentVocational ImpairmentDisability BenefitsStatutory InterpretationClear and Convincing EvidenceAppellate ReviewJudgment ModificationTennessee Law
References
3
Case No. 2023-06-4955
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 18, 2024

Kean, Carma v. NAVION BKE BELLEVUE, LLC

Navion BKE Bellevue, LLC, filed a motion for partial summary judgment, contending there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding permanent impairment from Ms. Kean’s work-related injury. After a hearing, the Court granted the motion, finding no permanent impairment. However, because the parties agreed the claim was compensable, the Court ordered Navion to provide continuing reasonable and necessary medical treatment. The Court dismissed Ms. Kean's claim for permanent disability benefits with prejudice but affirmed her entitlement to future medical benefits, the need for which must be determined at the time they are requested.

Summary JudgmentPermanent ImpairmentMedical Treatment BenefitsWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdmissibility of EvidenceC-32 FormsMedical Records AdmissibilityWaiver of ObjectionCompensabilityTemporary Disability Benefits
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Powell v. Blalock Plumbing & Electric & HVAC, Inc.

William M. Barker dissents from the majority and concurring opinions in a permanent partial disability case. The core issue is whether the employee's award should be two and a half or four times his medical impairment rating under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241. Barker argues the employee is limited to two and a half times because he believes the employee made a meaningful return to work and earned a wage equal to or greater than before the injury. While reluctantly agreeing with the majority's interpretation of "wage" based on precedent, Barker strongly disagrees that the employee failed to make a "meaningful return to work." He asserts that working eighty percent of pre-injury hours, combined with continued employment at the same wage and benefits, constitutes a meaningful return, especially given the employee's ability to work additional hours on his own construction business, which he believes indicates the reduction in hours with the defendant is not due to pain from the injury.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWorkers' Compensation LawImpairment RatingWage DefinitionMeaningful Return to WorkTennessee Workers' Compensation ActStatutory InterpretationMultiplier CalculationEconomic LossJudicial Dissent
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Evers

M. W. Evers, an employee, suffered a 40% partial permanent incapacity to his right shoulder due to an injury sustained while working for Columbian Carbon Company. He was awarded compensation for 300 weeks from Texas Employers’ Insurance Association. The insurance association appealed, challenging the compensation award primarily because Evers continued to work for approximately 52 weeks post-injury at his regular wage. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, emphasizing that continued employment, especially under necessity and with employer/colleague assistance, does not negate a claim for permanent partial incapacity under workmen's compensation law, which should be liberally construed. The court also addressed and rejected the appellant's points of error regarding jury findings and newly discovered evidence.

Workers' CompensationPartial Permanent IncapacityAppellate ReviewAffirmation of JudgmentEarning CapacityContinued EmploymentMedical TestimonyShoulder InjuryNew Trial MotionJury Verdict
References
23
Showing 1-10 of 8,430 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational