CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Martone v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority-Metro

In 2005 and 2007, a bus driver (claimant) suffered work-related neck and back injuries. Initially, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found him permanently totally disabled. However, the Workers’ Compensation Board modified this, determining he had a permanent partial disability with a 75% loss of wage-earning capacity based on medical evidence and other factors. The claimant appealed this decision, arguing a lack of substantial evidence for the partial disability finding. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, noting medical reports indicating submaximal efforts, high medication dosages, symptom magnification, and the ability to ambulate, which supported the finding of partial disability. The court also upheld the 75% loss of wage-earning capacity, finding it supported by substantial evidence after considering the claimant's impairment, work restrictions, age, education, and work experience.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWage-Earning CapacityChronic Pain SyndromeLumbar Spine SurgeryMedical EvidenceSubmaximal EffortsSymptom MagnificationAppellate ReviewBoard DecisionMedical Treatment Guidelines
References
2
Case No. 533112
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 17, 2022

Matter of Reyes v. H & L Iron Works Corp.

A claimant appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision which found he violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and permanently disqualified him from future indemnity benefits. The claimant, Leonel Reyes, sustained work-related injuries in 2016 and received benefits. However, he failed to fully disclose his disc jockey activities and the physical nature of this work to the Board, carrier, and examining physicians while collecting benefits. Surveillance videos showed him lifting heavy equipment, contradicting his testimony. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed the WCLJ's finding of a violation and the imposition of both mandatory and discretionary penalties. The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that substantial evidence supported the violation and that the permanent forfeiture of indemnity benefits was not a disproportionate penalty given the claimant's multiple egregious misrepresentations.

Workers' Compensation Law § 114-aFalse RepresentationIndemnity BenefitsPermanent DisqualificationUndisclosed EmploymentDisc JockeyMaterial MisrepresentationSubstantial EvidenceWitness CredibilityDiscretionary Penalty
References
7
Case No. ADJ3134805 (BAK 0148440)
Regular
Feb 11, 2011

VELGRACE SMITH vs. KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

This case concerns a defendant seeking reconsideration of a decision that awarded a 15% increase in permanent disability indemnity payments. The administrative law judge (WCJ) found the employer failed to offer modified work within 60 days of the applicant's condition becoming permanent and stationary, as required by Labor Code section 4658(d)(2). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the WCJ's literal interpretation of the statute would lead to absurd consequences given the retroactive nature of medical findings and delayed service of reports. The Board held the 60-day period begins when the employer has knowledge of both the permanent and stationary status and work restrictions, and remanded the case to determine if the employer's modified work offer remained consistent with updated restrictions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationPermanent DisabilityModified WorkLabor Code Section 4658(d)AggravationCumulative InjuryAgreed Medical EvaluatorPermanent and Stationary DateWork Restrictions
References
3
Case No. 2019-01-0366
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 29, 2021

Lewallen, Denise v. Home Healthcare of East Tennessee, Inc.

Ms. Denise R. Lewallen sought permanent total disability benefits after sustaining multiple physical injuries in a motor vehicle accident while working for Home Healthcare of East Tennessee, Inc. The employer disputed her entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, a hernia claim, and an alleged mental injury (PTSD). Medical examinations by Dr. Scott Smith and Dr. Paul Johnson confirmed significant impairments and restrictions, with Dr. Smith ultimately adopting permanent light-duty restrictions. Ms. Lewallen's credible testimony regarding her inability to work due to pain and physical limitations was considered. The Court found Ms. Lewallen permanently and totally disabled, granting her permanent total disability benefits and denying her hernia and PTSD claims.

Permanent Total DisabilityMotor Vehicle AccidentOrthopedic InjuriesCervical Disc HerniationPTSD ClaimHernia ClaimMedical Impairment RatingFunctional Capacity EvaluationVocational DisabilityCertified Nursing Assistant
References
7
Case No. 2017-02-0604
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 10, 2018

Hughes, James v. Kennametal, Inc.

James Hughes sustained a work-related lung injury on June 13, 2016, while employed by Kennametal, Inc., after inhaling hydrogen chloride. The authorized physician, Dr. Jeff Farrow, assigned a 20% permanent impairment rating and extensive permanent restrictions, including environmental limitations. Hughes sought permanent total disability benefits, arguing his condition rendered him unable to maintain employment due to unreliable attendance. Vocational experts provided differing assessments of his vocational disability, ranging from 50% to 63%. However, the Court found Hughes failed to establish total incapacitation from working at any income-generating job, partly due to his lack of effort in seeking alternative employment within his restrictions. Consequently, the Court denied his claim for permanent total disability benefits but awarded permanent partial disability benefits of $51,066.93, after accounting for a temporary total disability overpayment.

Lung injuryPermanent partial disabilityVocational assessmentMedical restrictionsHydrogen chloride exposureWorkers' compensation claimsDisability benefitsEmployment limitationsMMI determinationTennessee law
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Arbitration Between Cortland County & CSEA, Inc.

Petitioners, Cortland County Sheriff and Cortland County, were parties to a collective bargaining agreement with an unnamed respondent union. A correction officer, Lawrence Jackson, was placed on family and medical leave due to a work restriction related to plantar fasciitis, preventing him from working mandatory overtime. The respondent union filed a grievance alleging a violation of the CBA, which petitioners denied, leading the respondent to demand arbitration. Petitioners then sought to permanently stay arbitration, but the Supreme Court denied their application and compelled arbitration. On appeal, the court affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, finding the dispute arbitrable as it related to the CBA's provisions on work schedules, overtime, and light-duty assignments, and no public policy considerations prohibited arbitration.

ArbitrationCollective Bargaining AgreementWork RestrictionMandatory OvertimeDisability BenefitsPlantar FasciitisGrievanceStay of ArbitrationAppellate ReviewPublic Employment
References
15
Case No. 2016-05-0666
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 18, 2017

Batey, Christopher v. Deliver This, Inc.

Christopher Batey, a delivery driver, sustained a spinal injury in 2015. He sought permanent total disability (PTD) or permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits from his employer, Deliver This, Inc., and its insurer, Auto Owners Insurance Company. The court denied his claim for PTD benefits, finding he was not totally incapacitated from all work. However, the court granted Mr. Batey's claim for extraordinary relief under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-242, awarding him 275 weeks of PPD benefits due to permanent restrictions and his inability to perform his pre-injury occupation. The employer was also ordered to provide a new panel of orthopedists for future medical benefits.

Permanent Partial DisabilityMedical BenefitsVocational DisabilitySpinal InjuryL5-S1 Disc HerniationMedical ImpairmentExtraordinary ReliefReturn to WorkEmployment RestrictionsTennessee Workers' Compensation
References
2
Case No. ADJ8641626
Regular
Oct 06, 2014

SYLVIA ESPINOZA vs. SALINAS VALLEY MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE

This case concerns whether an employer's offer of work triggers a decrease in permanent disability benefits. The applicant initially became permanent and stationary (P&S) in November 2012, and the employer made a timely offer of regular work. However, the applicant's condition later worsened, and she was declared P&S again in July 2013 with new restrictions. The Appeals Board found that while the applicant did not qualify for an increase in benefits, the employer could not rely on the prior offer for a decrease because her condition and restrictions had significantly changed. Therefore, no adjustment to the permanent disability rate was applied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSylvia EspinozaSalinas Valley Memorial HealthcareAcclamation Insurance Management ServicesPermanent and Stationary (P&S) reportLabor Code section 4658(d)(3)(A)Agreed Medical Examiner (AME)Robert SteinerM.D.permanent disability rate
References
4
Case No. 2017-08-0024
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 19, 2020

Thomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.

Alisha Thomas filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) seeking permanent total disability benefits or additional permanent partial benefits, which Federal Express Corp. disputed. The Court ruled that Ms. Thomas is entitled to increased permanent partial disability benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(3)(B) because she had not returned to work by the expiration of her initial compensation period, and her treating physician, Dr. Melvin Goldin, attributed her condition to the work injury at that time. However, the Court denied claims for additional benefits under section 50-6-242 and permanent total disability, as Dr. Goldin's later testimony revealed Ms. Thomas's condition had evolved beyond the initial somatic symptom disorder, and he could not definitively connect her advanced symptoms to the work injury at the time of the award. The awarded increased benefits totaled $3,379.01.

Permanent Partial DisabilitySomatic Symptom DisorderImpairment RatingRes JudicataMental Injury CompensabilityIncreased BenefitsSocial Security DisabilityTreating Physician TestimonyCausation StandardSettlement Agreement
References
5
Case No. 2019-03-1440
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 30, 2023

Satterfield, Kimberly v. Smokey Mountain Home Health & Hospice

Ms. Kimberly Satterfield, a registered nurse, suffered a work-related injury on January 29, 2019, impacting her right knee, shoulder, middle finger, and hip. After her initial compensation period, she sought increased benefits, extraordinary relief, or permanent total disability benefits. The Court considered various medical evaluations and vocational expert testimonies, noting significant permanent restrictions from physicians like Dr. William Kennedy. Ultimately, the Court denied permanent total disability benefits, agreeing that some work was possible despite limitations. However, it granted Ms. Satterfield extraordinary relief, ordering Smoky Mountain Home Health & Hospice to pay 275 weeks of benefits totaling $188,397.00, finding it inequitable to limit her to only increased benefits given her substantial employment restrictions.

Workers' CompensationExtraordinary ReliefPermanent RestrictionsVocational DisabilityRegistered NurseKnee InjuryShoulder InjuryFinger InjuryHip InjuryMedical Evaluation
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 14,772 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational