CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Keselman v. New York City Transit Authority

Claimant, injured in 1986, initially established a right shoulder injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed this but denied a causally related neck injury in 1996. After another application in 1998 alleging a worsened neck condition, the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found a causally related neck injury and permanent partial disability, awarding benefits from February 5, 1998, which the Board affirmed. Separately, the Board also ruled the employer was entitled to credit schedule payments against disability payments made after February 5, 1998. The court affirmed both decisions, finding substantial evidence supported the deterioration of the neck injury post-1996 and that schedule awards are independent of actual disability periods, thus allowing the employer's credit.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilitySchedule AwardDisability PaymentsNeck InjuryRight Shoulder InjuryCausally Related InjuryReopening CaseMedical EvidenceMRI
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of LaClaire v. Birds Eye Foods, Inc.

Claimant sustained work-related injuries to her left and right knees in 2007. The Workers' Compensation Board subsequently determined that her condition warranted a marked permanent partial disability classification, entitling her to continuing disability benefits rather than a schedule loss of use award. The employer and its workers' compensation carrier appealed this determination. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence, including the claimant's orthopedic surgeon's testimony regarding crepitus, swelling, and severe pain, supported the marked permanent partial disability classification. Furthermore, the court concluded that the Board did not abuse its discretion in requiring additional proof concerning any overpayments made to the claimant.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilitySchedule Loss of UseKnee InjuriesAppellate ReviewSubstantial EvidenceMedical OpinionCredibility AssessmentOverpaymentsDisability Benefits
References
6
Case No. ADJ3783720 (EUR 0038931)
Regular
Apr 05, 2011

STANLEY HOLCOMB, JR. vs. TOWN OF SCOTIA COMPANY, LLC, Successor In Interest to THE PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY (PSI), Administered By TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended a prior decision regarding the applicable Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. The Board determined that Dr. Brandvold's November 17, 2004 report indicated permanent disability, thus triggering an exception under Labor Code section 4660(d). Consequently, the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule, not the 2005 Schedule, must be applied. The case is returned for further proceedings to determine permanent disability under the correct schedule.

2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule1997 ScheduleLabor Code section 4660(d)Petition for ReconsiderationWCJ's Report and Recommendationtreating neurosurgeonQualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs)cumulative injuryapportionmentpermanent disability
References
6
Case No. ADJ1099369
Regular
Jul 01, 2009

SANDRA SMULLEN vs. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award, finding that the applicant's pre-2005 treating physician reports sufficiently indicated permanent disability. Consequently, the Board applied the 1997 permanent disability rating schedule instead of the 2005 schedule. This resulted in an amended award of 56 percent permanent disability based on the stipulated rating under the 1997 schedule. The decision reversed the prior award that had utilized the 2005 schedule and awarded 35 percent permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPermanent Disability Rating Schedule2005 Rating Schedule1997 Rating ScheduleLabor Code section 4660(d)Petition for ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryPolice OfficerBack InjuryTreating Physician
References
6
Case No. ADJ6879193
Regular
Feb 10, 2012

KATHERINE LAU vs. CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN and ASSOCIATES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the application of the 1997 vs. 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedules. The Board reversed the WCJ's finding, determining there was insufficient pre-2005 medical evidence of permanent disability to apply the 1997 schedule. Consequently, the Board applied the 2005 schedule, reducing the applicant's permanent disability rating from 29% to 12%. One Commissioner dissented, arguing the record supported the use of the 1997 schedule based on pre-2005 indications of permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardPermanent Disability Rating1997 Schedule2005 ScheduleLabor Code Section 4660(d)Comprehensive Medical-Legal ReportTreating Physician ReportIndustrial Injury
References
4
Case No. ADJ302815 (OXN 0136951)
Regular
Sep 27, 2010

PETER RODRIGUEZ vs. MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, INC., MAJESTIC INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to determine which permanent disability rating schedule applies to Peter Rodriguez's 2004 industrial injury. The Board reversed the trial judge, finding that Dr. Ghilarducci's May 21, 2004 report constituted substantial evidence of permanent disability prior to January 1, 2005. Consequently, the Board held that the 1997 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities, not the 2005 Schedule, applies to this case. The matter was remanded for further proceedings to apply the correct schedule to determine permanent disability and apportionment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationAmended Findings and AwardLabor Code2005 Schedule1997 SchedulePermanent DisabilityApportionmentMedical-Legal ReportTreating Physician
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 24, 2002

In re the Claim of Miller v. North Syracuse Central School District

This case involves an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision concerning overlapping workers' compensation awards. The claimant, a food services worker, filed two separate claims: one for occupational disease to her shoulders, leading to a schedule loss of use award, and another for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, which resulted in a temporary total disability award for the period from December 13, 1999, to February 14, 2000. The State Insurance Fund argued that the schedule loss of use award should be suspended for this period to prevent an overlap. Initially, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge disagreed, but the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed, ruling in favor of suspending the schedule award. On appeal, the court reversed the Board's decision, clarifying that a schedule award is not allocable to a specific period of disability and therefore does not overlap with a temporary total disability award covering a limited timeframe. The court distinguished this from cases involving permanent disability awards. The matter was remitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board for recalculation of the claimant’s award.

Workers' CompensationSchedule Loss of UseTemporary Total DisabilityOverlapping AwardsEarning CapacityOccupational DiseaseCarpal Tunnel SyndromeShoulder InjuryAppellate ReviewRecalculation of Award
References
7
Case No. ADJ4099888 (WCK 0066521)
Regular
Nov 16, 2011

SALLY MERDIAN vs. AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, CHARTIS INSURANCE

This case concerns the proper permanent disability rating schedule to apply for an injury sustained in 2002. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) found that the primary treating physician's December 20, 2004 report, when considered with the entire record, provided substantial evidence of permanent disability prior to January 1, 2005. Therefore, the WCAB rescinded the trial judge's decision and returned the case to the trial level to rate the permanent disability using the 1997 Schedule, not the 2005 Schedule. The WCAB clarified that the magnitude of the injury or disability is immaterial to determining if a pre-2005 report "indicates" permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardPermanent DisabilityRating SchedulePrimary Treating PhysicianMedical-Legal ReportLabor Code Section 4660(d)Industrial InjuryNeck Injury
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.

The claimant, a construction worker, experienced a severe exacerbation of pre-existing asthma after exposure to burning lead paint fumes in June 1996. A certified pulmonologist, Richard Evans, determined the exposure caused a permanent and total disability. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) found an accidental injury causing permanent and total disability, which the Workers' Compensation Board affirmed in August 2001. The employer and carrier appealed, arguing the condition was pre-existing and only temporarily aggravated. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence to support that the work-site exposure significantly exacerbated the claimant's stabilized asthma, leading to a permanent and total disability.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Total DisabilityAsthma ExacerbationOccupational ExposureLead Paint FumesPre-existing ConditionMedical Expert TestimonySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewIndustrial Accident
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Somers v. Texaco, Inc.

The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed two prior decisions, determining that the claimant had a permanent partial disability not amenable to a schedule loss evaluation. Medical evidence supported the finding of ongoing right shoulder pain that hindered work and was likely permanent. The Board's factual resolution of conflicting medical opinions was upheld. The employer’s remaining arguments on appeal were found to be without merit.

Workers CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilitySchedule Loss EvaluationMedical EvidenceFactual DeterminationAppellate ReviewJudicial ReviewSubstantial EvidenceDisability BenefitsShoulder Injury
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 8,332 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational