CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9054913
Regular
Jun 02, 2015

OSCAR MIRANDA GARCIA vs. SUNSET QUALITY CLEANING SERVICES, HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendants' Petition for Reconsideration and denied their Petition for Removal. The petition was untimely filed and sought reconsideration of a non-final interlocutory order. Furthermore, the defendants failed to demonstrate the substantial prejudice or irreparable harm required for removal. The Board admonished the defendants' attorney and law firm for filing an untimely petition and improperly attaching an existing document.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalQME panelspsychiatryorthopedic surgerysubstantial prejudiceirreparable harmuntimely petitionfinal orderinterlocutory order
References
6
Case No. ADJ9016568
Regular
Feb 23, 2016

JAVIER SOTO CONTRERAS, AMANDA ARANA vs. A.C. CUSTOM CATERING, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, JAVIER SOTO CONTRERAS, ALLMERICA FINANCIAL BENEFIT INSURANCE, THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP

This case concerns a petition by SCIF (on behalf of A.C. Custom Catering) seeking removal and disqualification of both the applicant's attorney and the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The petition argued the applicant's attorney had a conflict of interest representing two claimants and that the WCJ was biased. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition regarding the attorney's disqualification as untimely. Regarding the WCJ, the Board denied disqualification because the petition lacked specific factual allegations of bias and was also untimely.

Petition for RemovalPetition for DisqualificationWCJSCIFA.C. Custom Cateringjoint representationconflict of interestwaiveruntimelyjudicial bias
References
3
Case No. ADJ3344826
Regular
Nov 09, 2010

RONALD FRYER vs. CORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY MARKET, TRAVELERS INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding an order to authorize medical treatment and pay bills, as well as dismissing the applicant's untimely petition for reconsideration. The defendant argued the WCJ erred in ordering reimbursement for bills not following Utilization Review, while the applicant claimed further wrongdoing and sought an award of benefits. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, denying the defendant's petition, and dismissed the applicant's petition as untimely.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderMedical Treatment AuthorizationPrimary Treating PhysicianMedical Provider NetworkGym MembershipIndustrial InjuryUtilization ReviewApplicant
References
2
Case No. ADJ1534095 (LAO 0820188)
Regular
Dec 16, 2013

PAMELA MCMILLIN vs. XEROX CORPORATION; ACE USA, administered by SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration of an order dismissing its lien was untimely filed. Because the original petition was untimely, the administrative law judge lacked jurisdiction to rescind the dismissal order. Therefore, the Board rescinded the judge's order and dismissed the lien claimant's petition, leaving the original dismissal order in effect.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Rescinding DecisionLien ClaimLien Activation FeeLabor Code Section 4903.06JurisdictionUntimely FilingCompromise and ReleaseWCJ
References
1
Case No. ADJ7768905
Regular
Sep 13, 2016

TRACEY LOMBARDI vs. SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition, which sought disqualification of the administrative law judge, removal, and reconsideration. The disqualification petition was denied as untimely, filed after the swearing of the first witness. The removal petition failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Finally, the reconsideration petition was dismissed because it did not seek review of a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for DisqualificationPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 5311Appeals Board Rule 10452Untimely PetitionExtraordinary RemedySubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable Harm
References
6
Case No. ADJ3808038 (LAO 0819022)
Regular
Feb 11, 2010

NICOLAS F. BENINKOFF (Deceased), LORENA BENINKOFF (Widow) vs. DARCO METAL SURFACING, INC.; and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board denied petitions for removal and reconsideration from lien claimants and the defendant, and denied the applicant's reconsideration petition. Lien claimants Kan and Ace's petition for removal was denied as they failed to show substantial prejudice, and their reconsideration petition was dismissed as the prior order was not final. The applicant's reconsideration petition was denied because her claim for home healthcare services was deemed an untimely lien claim under Labor Code section 4903.5.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalReconsiderationLien ClaimantsUntimely LienLabor Code section 4903.5Labor Code section 5405Home Healthcare ServicesMedical TreatmentTransportation Expenses
References
5
Case No. ADJ7557927
Regular
May 08, 2012

AJ SCROGGINS vs. WORLD COLOR, TRAVELERS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petitions for reconsideration and removal as untimely. The defendant filed both petitions 26 days after the Amended Findings, Award, and Order were served by mail, exceeding the 20-day statutory limit plus the additional five days for mail service. The Appeals Board also noted that even if the petitions were timely, they would have been denied on the merits based on the WCJ's report. The defendant's request to disqualify the Administrative Law Judge was also dismissed as untimely.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAmended Findings Award and OrderIndustrial InjuryTemporary DisabilityMedical TreatmentImpeach Applicant TestimonySub Rosa Video EvidenceExclusion of Evidence
References
4
Case No. SBR 0271963; SBR 0247442; SBR 0247444; SBR 0247445; VNO 0299465; LAO 0761513; LAO 0761514; LAO 0761515; LAO 0761516; LAO 0761517; LAO 0761518; LAO 0761519; LAO 0761520; LAO 0761521; LAO 0761522; LAO 0761523; LAO 0761524; LAO 0761525; LAO 0761526; LAO 0761527; LAO 0761528; LAO 0761529; LAO 0761530
Regular
Dec 10, 2007

EDAR Y. ROGLER vs. LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT E. JOHNSON; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed an attorney's petition seeking to remove or disqualify Judge Kacey Joseph Keating from presiding over her cases. The WCAB found the petition for removal procedurally improper and the petition for automatic reassignment untimely, as prior hearings involving the judge had occurred. Furthermore, the WCAB denied the disqualification petition because the applicant failed to provide legally sufficient grounds or a required affidavit.

WCABPetition for RemovalPetition for Automatic ReassignmentPetition for DisqualificationWCJLabor Code Section 5311WCAB Rule 10453WCAB Rule 10452Code of Civil Procedure Section 641Attorney Applicant
References
0
Case No. ADJ288239 (MON 0344949)
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

ROSA AQUEVEQUE vs. CULVER CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a lien claimants' petition for reconsideration because it was untimely and an improper successive petition. The lien claimants failed to file their petition within the mandated 20-day window after the dismissal orders were served. Furthermore, they had previously filed an identical petition which was also dismissed as untimely. The WCAB held that repeated, untimely petitions without new evidence are not permissible.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantsPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalUntimely FilingSuccessive PetitionLabor Code Section 5903WCAB Rule 10507Compromise and ReleaseIndustrial Injury
References
3
Case No. ADJ3736897 (RIV 0044021)
Regular
Apr 07, 2014

TERESA BOLTON vs. PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN ASSOCIATES

The Appeals Board granted the lien claimant's petitions for removal, finding the defendant's petition for reconsideration untimely. The Board rescinded the WCJ's order vacating a prior minute order that required the defendant to pay $300 to the lien claimant. Consequently, the November 27, 2013 minute order, requiring the defendant to pay the costs, was reinstated. The defendant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as untimely.

Petition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingWCJ AuthorityMinute OrderLien ClaimantCosts AwardRescinded OrderReinstated OrderAppeals Board
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 14,682 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational