CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ7529761
Regular
Sep 02, 2018

MARIA GARCIA vs. GREEN CUISINE, INC., GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves Southern Insurance Company seeking reconsideration of an arbitrator's award of contribution to Golden Eagle Insurance Company. Southern argued a contribution petition filed before a Compromise and Release (C&R) approval was void, and Golden Eagle missed the subsequent one-year limitations period. The Board denied reconsideration, adopting the arbitrator's report and finding the initial petition timely filed under Labor Code Section 5500.5(e). The Board clarified that filing before award approval does not void a contribution petition, especially when the C&R doesn't require a refiling.

Petition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleasePetition for ContributionLabor Code section 5500.5(e)ContributionArbitratorFindings and AwardGolden Eagle Insurance CompanySouthern Insurance CompanyIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ14138672
Regular
Aug 05, 2025

MARIO HERNANDEZ vs. FRESH QUALITY PRODUCE, INC.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; CYPRESS INSURANCE C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANY

Defendant State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) sought reconsideration of an Arbitrator's Decision on Petition for Contribution, which found Cypress Insurance liable for a portion of contribution. SCIF contended that the WCA should have relied on Labor Code section 5500.5 to determine the last injurious exposure period and award a higher contribution. The Appeals Board received an answer and the Arbitrator's Report and Recommendation, which suggested denying reconsideration. After preliminary review, the Appeals Board granted SCIF's Petition for Reconsideration, but this is not a final order. The final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and the entire record.

Petition for ReconsiderationState Compensation Insurance FundCypress InsuranceLabor Code section 5500.5contributionlast injurious exposurecumulative injurytimely actednotice of transmissionsubstantial evidence
References
Case No. ADJ1009271 (AHM 0055424)
Regular
Apr 27, 2009

MYRNA PEREZ vs. FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., REM, LTD, GOLDEN EAGLE

This case concerns a contribution dispute between two insurance carriers, TIG and Golden Eagle, for a cumulative trauma injury claim. Golden Eagle sought reconsideration of an order compelling it to pay over $\$101,000$ in contribution to TIG. Golden Eagle argued it was never properly served with a notice of intention and that Labor Code section 5275 mandates arbitration for contribution disputes. The Appeals Board agreed that mandatory arbitration applies, rescinded the order, and remanded the case for either informal resolution or arbitration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder of ContributionPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code section 5275mandatory arbitrationContributionCumulative Trauma InjuryCompromise and Release AgreementPetition for ContributionNotice of Intention
References
Case No. ADJ3674251 (SDO 0355041)
Regular
Jun 02, 2010

JACQUELINE NGUYEN vs. MPEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an insurer's petition for removal after a WCJ denied their request to join a prior employer and its insurer for contribution. The applicant has received benefits from two prior awards. The Appeals Board granted the removal, rescinded the denial of joinder, and returned the matter to the trial level. This action is to facilitate arbitration regarding the date of last injurious exposure and coverage status, which are prerequisites for contribution proceedings under Labor Code section 5500.5.

Petition for RemovalOrder Denying Petition for JoinderPetition for ContributionJoinder of PartiesContribution ProceedingsLabor Code Section 5500.5Date of Last Injurious ExposureDate of Injury Section 5412ArbitrationRescinded Order
References
Case No. ADJ7255629, ADJ7258202
Regular
Apr 23, 2013

ROMALDA MERCADO vs. CM LAUNDRY, LLC, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES for CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order dismisses the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a July 18, 2012 decision. The dismissal is based on the petitioner's withdrawal of the petition. Furthermore, the Board notes that the petition was likely untimely and defective, as indicated in the administrative law judge's report.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissing PetitionUntimely PetitionDefective PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law Judge's ReportCase NumbersApplicantDefendantsWithdrawal of Petition
References
Case No. ADJ3399937 (VNO 0423516 ADJ8997142 ADJ10559387 ADJ7656828
Regular
Feb 27, 2019

DAVE ZADA vs. ALPRO MILLWORKING, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Dave Zada's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB found the petition untimely, successive, and skeletal, failing to meet procedural requirements for reconsideration. Zada also did not demonstrate how he was aggrieved by the prior WCAB decision. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationPro PerSuccessive PetitionUntimely PetitionSkeletal PetitionAggrieved PartyJurisdictional Time LimitVerified PleadingsMaterial EvidenceProof of Service
References
Case No. ADJ8183477
Regular
Jan 14, 2016

DOLORES MOSELEY vs. NOIA RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, INC., ICW GROUP/INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Dolores Moseley's petition for reconsideration. The petition was untimely as it sought reconsideration of an award made over a year prior to filing. Furthermore, the petition was unverified and lacked specificity regarding the issues and legal arguments. Finally, the orders Moseley sought to reconsider were either vacated or deemed non-final procedural decisions, rendering the petition moot.

Labor Code Section 132aPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeOrder Dismissing PetitionOrder Vacating Trial DateStipulations with Request for AwardTimelinessJurisdictionalVerification
References
Case No. ADJ4680684 (LAO 0878962) ADJ2228561 (LAO 0878963)
Regular
Feb 19, 2016

ARTURO AVILA vs. CARIMEX INTERNATIONAL TRADING, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a dispute over contribution liability between two insurance carriers for an applicant's cumulative trauma injury. The original Findings and Award determined Everest National Insurance was 68% liable and SCIF 32% liable, ordering Everest to pay SCIF $31,513.97. Everest's petition for reconsideration focuses solely on the monetary calculation, not the proportional liability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to rescind the original award, as the WCA's attempt to rescind it was untimely. The matter is returned to the WCA for further proceedings and a proper decision on the monetary calculations.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardPetition for ContributionEquitable ContributionCumulative Trauma InjurySpecific InjuryJoint Compromise and ReleaseCredit for PaymentsSupplemental ProceedingsLabor Code Section 5500.5
References
Case No. ADJ6705977 ADJ6880053
Regular
Jun 13, 2014

TERRI SIEGEL vs. WALGREENS, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's untimely petition for removal, finding it lacked merit and was frivolous. The Board noted the petition was filed months after the subject orders, violating the 20-day filing deadline. Additionally, the defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice or irreparable harm, or that reconsideration would be inadequate. Consequently, the Board intends to impose sanctions of up to $1,000 on the defendant for filing a baseless petition.

Petition for RemovalUntimely PetitionOrder Vacating SubmissionOrder Taking Off CalendarReport and RecommendationSanctionsFrivolous PetitionLabor Code Section 5813Appeals Board Rule 10561Significant Prejudice
References
Showing 1-10 of 13,625 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational