CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ14723140
Regular
Aug 08, 2025

Phillip Howlett, et al. vs. California Highway Patrol, State Compensation Insurance Fund

Defendant California Highway Patrol sought reconsideration of a 'Findings and Award' which applied a presumption of compensability for cancer, resulting in the applicant's death. Defendant argued it had rebutted the presumption and that applicant's subsequent employer, University of California Police Department, was liable. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct technical errors in the original F&A, rescinding and reissuing it without substantive changes. The Board affirmed that the Labor Code section 3212.1 cancer presumption applied to CHP employment and was not rebutted. It further clarified that the presumption does not extend to the University of California Police Department, and the defendant provided no evidence of causation under traditional analysis for the subsequent employer.

ADJ14723140Phillip HowlettCalifornia Highway Patrollegally uninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardLabor Code Section 3212.1cancerpresumption of compensability
References
Case No. ADJ7131007
Regular
Oct 18, 2010

PHILLIP SCHWARTZ (DEC'D.) vs. HALLIDAY MANAGEMENT, GAB ROBINS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Petition for Removal in the case of Phillip Schwartz (deceased) v. Halliday Management and GAB Robins. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) as the basis for its decision. The order denying removal was filed on October 18, 2010.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeADJ7131007Denying RemovalHalliday ManagementGab RobinsPhillip Schwartz (Dec'd)Order Denying RemovalDenial of Removal
References
Case No. ADJ3810369
Regular
Apr 08, 2009

NANCY PHILLIPS vs. SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ACE/USA, KEENAN & ASSOCIATES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Nancy Phillips' petition for reconsideration of an administrative law judge's award of $7,500 in attorney's fees to her former counsel, Jeffrey S. Segal. Phillips argued her prior counsel was only worth $1,500 and that she secured a better settlement on her own. The Board found Segal's $7,500 fee justified, considering the case's complexity, the significant responsibility he assumed, and the settlement he generated prior to being substituted out. Therefore, the Board upheld the original award, denying Phillips' request for reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardCompromise and ReleaseAttorney's FeesLien ClaimAdministrative Law JudgeIndustrial InjuryBack InjuryPsyche Injury
References
Case No. ADJ 9123567
Regular
Mar 18, 2016

PHILLIP WARD vs. CITY OF FORT BRAGG

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the City of Fort Bragg's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found that the applicant's "left ventricular stiffness" or "diastolic dysfunction" qualified as "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.5. This finding meant the applicant's injury was presumed to be industrially caused, and the defendant failed to rebut this presumption. Therefore, the original award of injury, permanent disability, and medical treatment was upheld.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDenialPhillip WardCity of Fort BraggPolice SergeantCumulative InjuryHeart TroubleHypertensionLabor Code Section 3212.5
References
Case No. ADJ7454744
Regular
Oct 25, 2019

CAROL PHILLIPS vs. COUNTY OF FRESNO, RISICO CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an administrative law judge's (WCJ) decision regarding Carol Phillips' workers' compensation claim against the County of Fresno. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings that Phillips sustained an industrial injury to her circulatory and heart systems, resulting in 15% permanent disability. However, the Board deferred the issue of temporary disability indemnity pending further development of the record. The Board also corrected the permanent disability indemnity rate to $230 per week and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.

AOE/COESection 3212 presumptioncorrectional officerpsychiatric injurypermanent disabilitytemporary disability indemnityQualified Medical Examiner (QME)apportionmentduty to return to workmedical retirement
References
Case No. ADJ8794924
Regular
Nov 12, 2013

PHILLIP POSTON vs. CALTRANS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a Caltrans road maintenance worker who claimed psychological injury due to alleged workplace harassment. The applicant's claim was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing the denial was erroneous. The WCAB denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report which found the applicant failed to prove a compensable injury. The WCJ concluded the matter stemmed from an employment dispute rather than a medical condition, and the applicant did not meet the burden of proof.

Petition for ReconsiderationWCJ ReportDenialCaltransState Compensation Insurance FundPhillip PostonADJ8794924workers' compensationinjurypsyche
References
Case No. ADJ 1082421 (RIV 00, ADJ 2895025 (RIV 00, ADJ 4589469 (RIV 004
Regular
Oct 26, 2009

Robert Phillips vs. HITCHCOCK AUTOMOTIVE, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUNRISE FORD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, BOARD FORD, INC., AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE c/o RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT, REDLANDS FORD, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY CO.

The Arbitrator found that applicant suffered a single continuous trauma injury. SCIF and Ace Property filed petitions for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the Arbitrator's decision, except for amending Finding 7 and adding an award of contribution.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRobert PhillipsHitchcock AutomotiveCambridge Integrated Services GroupState Compensation Insurance FundSunrise FordRedlands FordACE Property and Casualty CompanyGallagher Bassett ServicesInc.
References
Case No. SBR 0283205, SBR 0267402
Regular
Dec 11, 2007

PHILLIP F. GARCIA vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN AIRCRAFT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, ESIS, TRAVELERS INSURANCE (ADM./ADJ. AGT.)

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an award for total permanent disability, which combined the effects of a 1995 shoulder/arm/hand injury and a 1998 bilateral shoulder/upper extremity injury. The defendant, Lockheed Martin, argued that separate awards were required as the injuries became permanent and stationary at different times and affected different body parts. The Board rescinded the award and returned the case to the trial level to await a forthcoming en banc decision on the applicability of the Wilkinson doctrine regarding combined permanent disability awards.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLockheed Martin Aircraft ServicesPermissibly Self-InsuredESISTravelers InsurancePhillip F. GarciaFurther Supplemental Findings and AwardTotally Permanently Disabled1995 injury1998 injury
References
Case No. ADJ4500999
Regular
Jan 29, 2010

RICHARD ROSS vs. CONOCO PHILLIPS, ACE

This case involves a refinery operator, Richard Ross, who sustained a back injury in 2007. The defendant, Conoco Phillips, contested the finding that Ross would have continued working absent the injury and his entitlement to temporary disability benefits. The WCJ's report indicates that Ross credibly testified he would have retired at 65 and sought other employment if unable to work at Conoco. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) adopted the WCJ's report and denied reconsideration. The WCAB also noted a procedural issue with the defendant's petition exceeding the statutory review period, but allowed review based on actual notice.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeStatutory Time PeriodDue ProcessAgreed Medical ExaminerTemporary Disability BenefitsRetirement PreclusionSpecific Incident InjuryRefinery Operator
References
Case No. ADJ2417988
Regular
Oct 01, 2010

PHILLIP NEELY vs. GTE CORPORATION/ACE USA as administered by BROADSPIRE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration in the case of Phillip Neely v. GTE Corporation/ACE USA. This decision allows the WCAB further time to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues presented. The reconsideration is necessary to ensure a complete understanding of the record for a just and reasoned decision. All future communications related to this matter should be directed to the Commissioners' Office in San Francisco.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGTE CorporationBroadspirestatutory time constraintsfactual and legal issuesjust and reasoned decisionDecision After ReconsiderationCommissioners' OfficeAdelson Testan & Brundo
References
Showing 1-10 of 53 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational