CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Pallas v. New York State Police

This case involves an appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision awarding workers' compensation benefits due to the death of a New York State Police sergeant. The sergeant died in an automobile collision after leaving a restaurant, having previously attended Magistrate's Court for work. Appellants argued that the sergeant abandoned his employment during the two-hour stop at the restaurant. However, a city police report indicated the sergeant's condition was "normal" and the truck driver was at fault. The court found no evidence of intoxication or personal pursuits adding to travel risks, and determined that any deviation from employment was temporary and ended when the homeward journey resumed. The decision awarding benefits was affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.

Workers' CompensationEmployment DeviationCourse of EmploymentAccident During TravelPolice Officer DeathWork-Related InjuryAppellate ReviewFatal AccidentInsurance ClaimWorkmen's Compensation Board
References
4
Case No. 2015 NY Slip Op 00461 [124 AD3d 475]
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 15, 2015

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey v. Port Authority Police Lieutenants Benevolent Ass'n

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a judgment confirming an arbitration award that found the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey violated a collective bargaining agreement by ending free E-Z Pass privileges for retired police sergeants. The court ruled that the arbitrator did not exceed his authority and that his interpretation, which vested retired members with a lifetime interest in these privileges, was not irrational. The decision also clarified that a contractual phrase regarding 'applicable law' pertains to the award's binding nature, not a ground for vacating the award due to a mistake of law.

Arbitration AwardCollective Bargaining AgreementE-Z Pass PrivilegesRetired EmployeesArbitrator's AuthorityAppellate ReviewContractual InterpretationLifetime BenefitsJudicial ReviewPublic Authority
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Village of Southampton v. Village of Southampton Police Benevolent Ass'n

The Village of Southampton initiated a petition to permanently stay an arbitration sought by the Village of Southampton Police Benevolent Association (PBA). The PBA had demanded arbitration concerning benefits for former police sergeant Christopher A. Broich, who was terminated in 2007 for misconduct, a decision upheld by the Appellate Division. Broich's claims for benefits arose after he was granted World Trade Center accidental disability retirement benefits, prompting the PBA to argue for the reinstatement of various village benefits under their collective bargaining agreement. The Village contended that Broich, as a terminated employee, was ineligible for such benefits and that prior court judgments affirming his termination had res judicata effect. The court sided with the Village, granting the petition to permanently stay arbitration and denying the PBA's cross-motion, concluding that Broich's status as a terminated employee meant he could not invoke the CBA's grievance procedure and that res judicata applied.

ArbitrationStay of ArbitrationCollective Bargaining AgreementPublic Employment Relations BoardRes JudicataTermination of EmploymentEmployee BenefitsDisability RetirementWorkers' CompensationMisconduct
References
10
Case No. 2023 NY Slip Op 02725 [216 AD3d 1333]
Regular Panel Decision
May 18, 2023

Matter of Serrata v. Suffolk County Police Dept.

Claimant, a detective sergeant, was injured in a car accident while en route to the precinct to secure a police vehicle for a grand larceny investigation. The Workers' Compensation Board initially denied his claim, stating the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, and the special errand exception did not apply. The Appellate Division, Third Department, reversed this decision, finding that the claimant's altered temporal travel scheme due to being called in early while on standby constituted a special errand, making his injury compensable under the Workers' Compensation Law. The matter was remitted to the Board for further proceedings.

Workers' CompensationSpecial Errand ExceptionCommuting InjuryScope of EmploymentAppellate DivisionThird DepartmentPolice OfficerStandby DutyCar AccidentRemittal
References
13
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 12, 2013

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey v. Port Authority Police Sergeants Benevolent Ass'n

The Supreme Court of New York County affirmed an arbitration award dated February 11, 2013, which found that the petitioner violated a collective bargaining agreement by eliminating free E-Z Pass privileges for retired police sergeants. The court ruled that the arbitrator did not exceed authority, as the agreement incorporated a 1973 instruction granting lifetime EZ-Pass privileges to retirees. The court further clarified that the contractual phrase "in accordance with applicable law" refers to the binding nature of the arbitral award, not a ground for vacating the award due to a mistake of law. The decision was made by Justice Cynthia S. Kern and was unanimously concurred by the appellate panel.

Collective bargaining agreementE-Z Pass privilegesArbitration awardRetired employeesJudicial reviewArbitrator authorityContract interpretationLabor disputeMemorandum of AgreementAppellate Division concurrence
References
4
Case No. 93 CV 4888 (ADS)
Regular Panel Decision

Wenzel v. Nassau County Police Department

The plaintiff, Mary Ann Wenzel, a former Nassau County Police Officer, sued the Nassau County Police Department under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging civil rights violations and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendants sought dismissal, claiming the statute of limitations had expired. Wenzel argued for tolling the statute due to insanity under CPLR § 208. Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky recommended against tolling, finding Wenzel capable of protecting her legal rights. District Judge Spatt adopted this recommendation, ruling that Wenzel did not meet the "insanity" criteria for tolling the statute of limitations. Consequently, the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted, and the case was dismissed.

Civil RightsStatute of LimitationsTolling ProvisionInsanity Defense42 U.S.C. Section 1983CPLR Section 208Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureJudicial ReviewMotion to DismissDepression
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 06, 2012

Claim of Cook v. East Greenbush Police Department

The claimant, a patrol officer for the East Greenbush Police Department, filed for workers' compensation benefits after being diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder following a traumatic incident in January 2009 involving an armed suspect. His claim was denied by a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and subsequently affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, who found that the events giving rise to his injury were part of his job responsibilities. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, reiterating that for a mental injury from work-related stress to be compensable, the stress must exceed that normally encountered in the work environment. The court concluded that while the specific encounter was "extraordinary," the possibility of needing deadly force is an inherent part of a police officer's regular duties, regardless of department size. Therefore, the Board's decision to deny benefits was upheld.

Posttraumatic Stress DisorderPTSDMental InjuryWork-Related StressPolice OfficerAccidental InjuryWorkers' Compensation BenefitsScope of EmploymentNormal Work EnvironmentDeadly Force
References
4
Case No. 2019 NY Slip Op 09072
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 19, 2019

Matter of Tomaine (City of Poughkeepsie Police)

David Tomaine, a police officer, sustained a lower back injury in 2012, leading to surgery and his inability to return to work. He subsequently accepted a performance of duty disability retirement. The central dispute was whether his retirement was causally related to his injury and if he was entitled to workers' compensation benefits after March 2015. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially found a voluntary withdrawal from the labor market. However, the Workers' Compensation Board modified this, determining that Tomaine's retirement was causally related, he had not voluntarily withdrawn, and he was temporarily totally disabled, thus entitled to lost wage awards from March 2015 to July 2017. The employer, City of Poughkeepsie Police, appealed this decision, but the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's findings, concluding they were supported by substantial evidence.

Workers' Compensation LawDisability RetirementCausationLabor Market WithdrawalTotal DisabilityAppellate DivisionSubstantial Evidence ReviewMedical TestimonyPolice InjuryBack Injury
References
6
Case No. 2021 NY Slip Op 00553 [191 AD3d 659]
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 03, 2021

McNulty v. Port Wash. Police Dist.

This case involves Michael McNulty, a police officer for the Port Washington Police District (PWPD), who was injured in a collision with a PWPD vehicle operated by his coemployee, Nicholas Cangemi. McNulty and his wife filed an action against PWPD and Cangemi, alleging negligence and a violation of General Municipal Law § 205-e. The Supreme Court granted PWPD's motion to dismiss the complaint, citing the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law. It also granted Cangemi's motion for summary judgment, finding both were coemployees acting within the scope of employment, making workers' compensation the sole remedy. The Appellate Division affirmed both decisions, upholding the application of the Workers' Compensation Law's exclusivity provisions.

Personal InjuryPolice OfficerCoemployeeWorkers' Compensation ExclusivityNegligence ClaimSummary JudgmentMotion to DismissAppellate ReviewScope of EmploymentGovernmental Immunity
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 18, 1971

Claim of Juna v. New York State Police

Richard T. Juna, a New York State Police trooper, was killed in an automobile accident while returning to his duty station after a two-day leave. His employer and its insurance carrier appealed a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, which had found that Juna was acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident. The court considered that Juna was subject to 24-hour call, prohibited from outside employment prior to duty, and required to act in police matters even on leave. The accident occurred within his normal work area while he was fulfilling the requirement to be available at his station. The court affirmed the Board's determination, finding substantial evidence that Juna was under the control and for the benefit of his employer, thus acting within the course of his employment.

Workers' CompensationScope of EmploymentTravel to WorkPolice OfficerOff-Duty RegulationsEmployer ControlAccidental DeathAppellate ReviewCourse of EmploymentTwenty-Four Hour Call
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 749 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational