CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rowe v. Board of Education

Plaintiff sued Chatham Central School District Middle School for negligence after sustaining injuries from a fall in the school cafeteria, allegedly due to accumulated mud, water, and a lack of rain mats. The defendant School District subsequently impleaded the Chatham Central Teachers’ Association, claiming the Association was in control of the cafeteria and responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. Following a trial, the jury rendered a verdict of no cause for action in favor of both the School District and the Association. However, Special Term set aside this verdict and granted a new trial, based on evidence suggesting an accumulation of mud and water and the defendant's failure to provide janitorial services. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed Special Term's order, reinstating the original jury verdict, concluding that the jury's finding was not against the weight of the evidence given the conflicting testimony presented at trial.

NegligencePremises LiabilitySlip and FallJury VerdictWeight of EvidenceAppellate ReviewNew Trial Order ReversedSchool CafeteriaChatham Central School DistrictColumbia County
References
3
Case No. 2025 NY Slip Op 05688
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 15, 2025

Matter of Sahara Constr. Corp. v. New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings

Sahara Construction Corp. challenged a determination by the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) that upheld civil penalties and a restitution order for violations related to a home improvement project. The Appellate Division, Second Department, reviewed the CPLR article 78 proceeding. The court confirmed OATH's determination, finding that the imposed civil penalties of $5,000 and restitution of $230,266.63 were not disproportionate and fell within statutory guidelines. The Court also affirmed the denial of the petitioner's motions to dismiss and compel discovery, concluding they were not arbitrary and capricious. Consequently, the petition was denied, and the proceeding dismissed on the merits.

Home Improvement ContractorsCivil PenaltiesRestitution AwardAdministrative Code ViolationsCPLR Article 78Judicial ReviewAppellate ReviewAbuse of DiscretionSense of FairnessAdministrative Summons
References
7
Case No. ADJ2036926 (FRE 0233858) ADJ1097945 (FRE 0233859)
Regular
Sep 16, 2010

LINDLA PINI vs. COUNTY OF FRESNO, YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the judge's order to take the cases off calendar. The judge had determined further medical evidence was needed before trial, but the Board found this premature, as no evidence had yet been admitted. The Board stated that the necessity of augmenting the medical record can only be established after trial or submission for decision, not beforehand. The cases were returned to the trial level to be set for trial, with the judge retaining the power to supplement the record if necessary post-trial.

removalrescinded orderoff calendarmedical record developmentAlmaraz/Guzmansubstantial medical evidencesupplemental reportAME depotrial exhibitsmandatory settlement conference
References
1
Case No. ADJ170525
Regular
Jun 02, 2014

ELISA MONTES vs. J.T. INDUSTRIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board granted the lien claimant's Petition for Removal, reversing the WCJ's order to take the case off calendar. The WCJ had prematurely declared lien conferences premature despite a stipulated Award resolving the applicant's injury and agreeing to pay all liens of record, including the claimant's. The Board found the lien claimant's claim for services rendered prior to the Award ripe for resolution, even with a pending petition for new and further disability. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for a lien trial.

Petition for RemovalLien claimantOrder off calendarPetition for new & furtherLien trialCumulative traumaStipulated AwardPermanent disabilityFuture liensOutstanding balance
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortg., LLC

Mee Jin-Jo (now deceased and represented by her daughter Billian Jo) filed a pro se lawsuit against JPMC Specialty Mortgage, LLC, alleging improper retention of property after her eviction. Following a jury verdict of "no cause of action," Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court addressed Plaintiff's grievances concerning evidentiary rulings, consistency between in limine rulings and trial decisions, the presence of a corporate representative, proper service of discovery documents, opportunity to review deposition transcripts, judicial conduct, and the admissibility of new evidence and lay opinion testimony. The Court denied the motion, concluding that Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that a new trial was warranted.

Motion for New TrialRule 59 FRCPEvidentiary RulingsJury VerdictHarmless ErrorCorporate RepresentativeDeposition TranscriptLay Opinion TestimonyFederal Rules of EvidenceJudicial Discretion
References
50
Case No. ADJ2806552 (SAC 0224145)
Regular
May 13, 2009

JOELLE NEELEY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, LEGALLY UNINSURED

This case concerns a defendant's petition for removal denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The defendant objected to a trial continuance, arguing due process violations due to premature trial scheduling and questioning the evidence supporting the need for assisted living. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, clarifying that the trial issue is causation for the need of assisted living, not its necessity or utilization review. Therefore, the matter will proceed to trial on the disputed issue of causation and liability for assisted living costs.

Petition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferencePrimary Treating PhysicianAgreed Medical EvaluatorEvidence-Based MedicineSubstantial EvidenceAssisted Living FacilityCausation of NeedUtilization ReviewIndustrial Injuries
References
1
Case No. ADJ8209536, ADJ8209481
Regular
Nov 28, 2017

ALBERTINA FUNEZ vs. CHARLES RIVER LABS, ACE USA, ESIS

The applicant, Albertina Funez, sought removal of a WCJ's order setting her case for trial on all issues, arguing it prejudiced her ability to prove her claims. She contended that discovery was incomplete and a psychiatric PQME determination was a prerequisite to a full trial. The majority of the Appeals Board denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ that trial was the most effective means to resolve the PQME dispute and that applicant had not suffered irreparable harm. Commissioner Sweeney dissented, believing a trial on all issues was premature given deficiencies in the record, particularly regarding the psychiatric PQME, and that this could be wasteful of resources.

Petition for RemovalPsychiatric PQMEOrthopedic DisabilityPermanent DisabilityTemporary DisabilityCompensable InjuryDiscoveryMedical RecordsExpert Medical OpinionJudicial Resources
References
0
Case No. ADJ3698541 (VNO 0412457), ADJ3246761 (VNO 0416345), ADJ2731611 (VNO 0416346)
Regular
Feb 06, 2015

WEST GRIFFIN vs. HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Tristar Risk Management's petition for removal, which sought to halt trial proceedings for the applicant's claim for home health care reimbursement. Tristar argued the trial was premature, preventing adequate discovery and the development of the evidentiary record concerning new statutes applicable to the claim. The Board found that removal is an extraordinary remedy not warranted here, as the applicant bears the burden of proof at trial and Tristar has remedies available if aggrieved by a post-trial decision. The Board also confirmed Tristar's petition was timely filed.

ADJ3698541ADJ3246761ADJ2731611HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTERTRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENTPetition for RemovalWCJhome health care servicesNeri HernandezAugust 21
References
1
Case No. ADJ8075448
Regular
Oct 10, 2017

ALEX ROBLES vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a trial judge's award in favor of applicant Alex Robles against Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). SCGC sought reconsideration, asserting that crucial testimony was omitted from the trial record. The WCAB ordered transcription of all trial testimony to ensure a full and fair adjudication of SCGC's petition. This action was necessary to allow the Board further study of the factual and legal issues involved.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAOE/COEGoing and Coming RuleMinutes of HearingSummary of EvidenceTrial TestimonyWCAB Rule 10740Transcript TranscriptionElectronic Adjudication Management System
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 03, 1982

Cerrato v. Thurcon Construction Corp.

This case concerns a construction worker (plaintiff) who sustained serious injuries and sued 211 Thompson Corp. (owner) and Thurcon Construction Corp. (general contractor). Defendant 211 Thompson Corp. raised an affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction due to improper service of process. After the Statute of Limitations had expired, plaintiff moved to strike this defense, while 211 cross-moved to dismiss the action as time-barred. Special Term referred the issue of service validity to a referee, but the plaintiff argued for a jury trial on this factual issue. The Appellate Division, Supreme Court, New York County, modified Special Term's order, directing a jury trial on the validity of the service, while otherwise affirming the original determination. The dissenting opinion argued that the right to a jury trial should not be conditioned on the stage of proceedings or the impact of dismissal on the Statute of Limitations, and furthermore, considered the question of authority to accept service as one of law, not fact.

Jury TrialService of ProcessPersonal JurisdictionStatute of LimitationsAffirmative DefenseAppellate ReviewCPLRProcedural LawConstruction AccidentsNew York Courts
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 5,689 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational