CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ2738004
Regular
Nov 24, 2014

RONALD PAYTON vs. KLEINFELDER GROUP, AIG CLAIMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Ronald Payton's petition for reconsideration of a prior decision. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found that Payton's claims of injury were not supported by substantial evidence. The judge detailed how Payton, proceeding pro se, failed to present new or relevant evidence and misrepresented existing medical opinions. Therefore, the Board affirmed the original denial of the claim.

Petition for ReconsiderationSubstantial EvidenceAgreed Medical EvaluatorPro PerDWC-1MMIAgreed Medical EvaluatorPro SeNon-industrial PneumoniaToxicology
References
Case No. ADJ19479057
Regular
Aug 26, 2025

GERALD TORRES vs. PRO DEO FOUNDATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Defendant, Pro Deo Foundation and State Compensation Insurance Fund, petitioned for reconsideration of a WCJ's decision, which found Gerald Torres to be an employee of Pro Deo Foundation. Defendant contended Torres was a volunteer or independent contractor and should be judicially estopped from claiming workers' compensation due to a prior settlement. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's finding of employment, emphasizing the WCJ's credibility determinations and concluding that the defendant failed to satisfy the 'ABC' test for independent contractor status. The Board timely acted on and subsequently denied the petition for reconsideration.

Workers' CompensationPro Deo FoundationState Compensation Insurance FundGerald TorresADJ19479057Petition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact and OrdersEmployee StatusVolunteerIndependent Contractor
References
Case No. ADJ1122093 (SAC 0279029) ADJ988134 (SAC 0267349)
Regular
Nov 20, 2018

BOBBIE SANDERS vs. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Applicant Bobbie Sanders, previously declared a vexatious litigant under Rule 10782, filed a Petition for Removal without court approval. Rule 10782 requires pre-filing authorization for pro se litigants, with exceptions for licensed attorneys. The Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal because there was no significant change in circumstances or new evidence to warrant re-litigation of previously determined issues. Therefore, the document was not accepted for filing.

Vexatious litigantpre-filing orderAppeals Board Rule 10782Petition for Removalin pro perworkers' compensationEmployment Development DepartmentState Compensation Insurance FundADJ1122093ADJ988134
References
Case No. ADJ463252 (VNO 0529697) ADJ240577 (VNO 0529698)
Regular
Sep 21, 2012

SHARON MARR vs. JBL PRO MANUFACTURING, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Sharon Marr's petition for removal against JBL Pro Manufacturing and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. The dismissal was primarily based on the petition not being timely-filed. Even if it had been timely, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits, adopting the reasons stated by the administrative law judge.

Petition for RemovalTimely-filedWCJ ReportDismissedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJ463252ADJ240577JBL PRO MANUFACTURINGTRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICAFrank M. Brass
References
Case No. ADJ9800793
Regular
Oct 06, 2016

TRAVIS TIDWELL vs. PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES, COMPANION PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

In Tidwell v. Pro Traffic Services, the applicant, Travis Tidwell, petitioned for reconsideration of a July 12, 2016 decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues. This allows the Board to gain a complete understanding of the record for a just decision. All future filings related to the petition must now be submitted directly to the Commissioners' office in San Francisco, not district offices or e-filed.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardTravis TidwellPro Traffic ServicesCompanion Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyIntercare PasadenaSan Diego District OfficeStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned Decision
References
Case No. ADJ5756564
Regular
Jan 31, 2012

RICK HEER vs. WORLD MINERALS INC., TRAVELERS IMDEMNITY CO. OF ILLINOIS

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, rescinding the order setting the case for trial. The Board found that setting the matter for trial closed discovery prematurely, causing prejudice to the applicant who was transitioning from pro se representation and seeking to amend his claim to include additional body parts. The applicant's prior counsel faced illness and filing difficulties, and the Board determined that justice required further development of the record. The Board returned the matter to the Workers' Compensation Judge for further proceedings.

Petition for RemovalDecision After RemovalWCJApplicant Pro PerQualified Medical ExaminationSummary Rating DeterminationEmployee's Permanent Disability QuestionnaireMaximum Medical ImprovementConsultative RatingDeclaration of Readiness
References
Case No. AHM 107719, AHM 106525, AHM 106165, AHM 106205, AHM106504, AHM 106473
Regular
Oct 19, 2007

MARIA RODRIGUEZ, MARTHA GARCIA, EVELIA MONTES, MARIA RAMIREZ, LIDIA GODOY, MARIA RAMOS vs. MOTEL 6, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied petitions for reconsideration filed by applicants represented *pro se*, finding the petitions procedurally defective due to lack of original signatures, improper verification, and failure to state all material evidence. Furthermore, the applicants were represented by counsel at the time of filing, and their *pro se* filings were unauthorized. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicants lacked credibility and failed to prove industrial cumulative trauma injuries.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPropria PersonaConsolidated CasesCumulative TraumaCredibility DeterminationWCJ FindingsSubstitution of AttorneyVerified PetitionLabor Code Section 5902
References
Case No. ADJ1586983
Regular
Sep 23, 2010

JOSE ALVARADO vs. INERGY SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY C/O ESIS

The applicant sought reconsideration of a compromise and release agreement, alleging his signature was unwitnessed and thus invalid. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was not verified as required by Labor Code section 5902. Furthermore, the applicant failed to serve the petition on the defendant as mandated by Labor Code section 5905, another independent ground for dismissal. Even if procedurally correct, the Board indicated it would have denied the petition on its merits based on the WCJ's report.

Petition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseJoint Compromise and ReleasePro SeUnverified PetitionLack of ServiceLabor Code section 5905Labor Code section 5902Workers' Compensation JudgeReport and Recommendation
References
Case No. ADJ7785733, ADJ7632939
Regular
Oct 01, 2012

JOHN SHEK vs. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER OF OAKLAND, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE

This case involves applicant's petitions for reconsideration and removal concerning administrative orders that sustained objections to witness subpoenas and excused a witness's appearance. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petitions as intermediate orders are not subject to such review. They also denied the removal petition, finding no showing of significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board upheld the WCJ's decision to exclude undisclosed witnesses and excuse the excused witness based on the applicant's failure to comply with discovery and witness disclosure rules.

Pro sePetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalWCAB RulesSubpoena Duces TecumQuash SubpoenaExcuse Witness AppearanceMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscovery ClosureNewly Discovered Evidence
References
Showing 1-10 of 237 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational