CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc. v. M/V Kacey

Plaintiff Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc. brought an admiralty action against M/V Kacey, SPV 1 LLC, and Technomar Shipping Co. Inc. for cargo loss and damage. Defendants moved to dismiss for forum non conveniens based on a forum selection clause in the bills of lading, which stipulated disputes be decided in the carrier's principal place of business. The court addressed the plaintiff's arguments regarding the unenforceability of the clause, specifically concerning the inability to pursue in rem actions under Greek law and claims against Technomar. The court found that the Hague-Visby Rules would preserve the plaintiff's substantive rights for in rem claims and that an "Identity of Carrier" clause already precluded an in personam action against Technomar in this court. Consequently, the defendants' motion to dismiss was granted, and the plaintiff's complaint was dismissed. The court also declined to retain jurisdiction.

Admiralty LawForum Non ConveniensForum Selection ClauseBills of LadingCargo Loss and DamageCOGSAHague-Visby RulesHarter ActIn Rem JurisdictionIn Personam Jurisdiction
References
26
Case No. SAC 288492, SAC 292655, SAC 305718
Regular
Aug 08, 2008

JUDY BRAMBLETT vs. RETIREMENT HOUSING FOUNDATION, AUBURN RAVINE TERRACE; REM

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration and rescinded the prior award. The Board returned the case to the trial level, deferring a decision on permanent disability pending the outcome of a related California Court of Appeal case, *Benson v. Permanente Medical Group*. This decision means the original findings regarding the applicant's permanent and stationary date and permanent disability percentages are now set aside.

BramblettRetirement Housing FoundationAuburn Ravine TerraceREMindustrial injurylow backpsychecumulative traumapermanent and stationarypermanent disability
References
2
Case No. ADJ1009271 (AHM 0055424)
Regular
Apr 27, 2009

MYRNA PEREZ vs. FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., REM, LTD, GOLDEN EAGLE

This case concerns a contribution dispute between two insurance carriers, TIG and Golden Eagle, for a cumulative trauma injury claim. Golden Eagle sought reconsideration of an order compelling it to pay over $\$101,000$ in contribution to TIG. Golden Eagle argued it was never properly served with a notice of intention and that Labor Code section 5275 mandates arbitration for contribution disputes. The Appeals Board agreed that mandatory arbitration applies, rescinded the order, and remanded the case for either informal resolution or arbitration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder of ContributionPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code section 5275mandatory arbitrationContributionCumulative Trauma InjuryCompromise and Release AgreementPetition for ContributionNotice of Intention
References
0
Case No. ADJ7106696
Regular
Oct 09, 2012

JAMAL CLARK vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by CMS, NFL EUROPE, TIG INSURANCE, Administered by REM

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, *Jamal Clark v. Seattle Seahawks*, involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a July 16, 2012, award. The Board has granted this petition to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues presented. The Board believes this is necessary to thoroughly understand the record and render a just decision. Pending the Decision After Reconsideration, all filings must be submitted in writing directly to the Commissioners' office in San Francisco, not to district offices or through e-filing.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and OrdersStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersElectronic Adjudication Management SystemVan Nuys District Office
References
0
Case No. ADJ1150041
Regular
Jul 21, 2009

JAMES CARTER (Deceased) and EVELYN CARTER (Widow) vs. SUBURBAN STEEL INC., FRESNO FAB TECH., REM, CIGA for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The applicant, Evelyn Carter, filed an untimely and unverified petition seeking to disqualify Administrative Law Judge Abel Shapiro due to alleged discrimination and bias. The Board denied the petition, finding no evidence of bias in the record, despite the applicant's claims and procedural deficiencies. Although the petition was denied, the Judge has recused himself, and the case will be reassigned to a new judge for further proceedings. The Board also recommended an Information and Assistance Officer be present for the applicant.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for DisqualificationAdministrative Law JudgeUntimely PetitionUnverified PetitionDiscrimination ClaimBias ClaimLabor Code Section 5701Medical-Legal EvaluationCode of Civil Procedure Section 641
References
0
Case No. ADJ1150041 (FRE 0244995)
Regular
Apr 23, 2012

JAMES CARTER (Deceased) EVELYN CARTER (Widow) vs. SUBURBAN STEEL, INC.; FRESNO FAB TECH; REM; and CIGA for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation

The Applicant seeks reconsideration of the denial of her deceased husband's workers' compensation claim, arguing that the medical evidence is insufficient and biased. The Appeals Board dismissed her petition, finding it to be a successive petition challenging a prior denial, which is not permitted. Furthermore, her petition for removal to disqualify the judge was dismissed for failing to meet procedural requirements. The Board upheld the original finding that the cancer and death did not arise out of employment, relying on the well-reasoned medical opinion of Dr. O'Neill.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalSuccessive petitionsWrit of reviewCourt of AppealsDisqualification of WCJRule 10452Cancer and deathWelding
References
3
Case No. SRO 112972
Regular
Jun 12, 2008

STELLA JUAREZ vs. ARTERIAL VASCULAR ENGINEERING, NELSON STAFFING, CENTRE INSURANCE COMPANY by REM, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION by BROADSPIRE for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation

The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) has the right to seek contribution from Centre Insurance Company for workers' compensation benefits paid to an applicant with a cumulative trauma injury. CIGA's claim is not barred by the one-year limitation period for employer contribution claims under Labor Code section 5500.5(e), as CIGA is not an employer and Centre is considered "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9). Therefore, the Appeals Board granted CIGA's petition for reconsideration and reversed the arbitrator's decision, awarding CIGA contribution from Centre.

CIGAContributionReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderLabor Code section 5500.5Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)Cumulative TraumaGeneral EmployerSpecial EmployerOther Insurance
References
8
Case No. LAO 0806287
Regular
Dec 13, 2007

AURORA BARAJAS vs. THE MAINLAND COMPANY, INC. aka CRAZY SHIRTS, INC., ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY, INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Administered By ACE USA/ESIS, CENTRE INSURANCE COMPANY Administered By REM, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Administered By COMPLINK

The Appeals Board granted Shidu Chiropractic's petition for reconsideration and amended the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decision. While Shidu was properly notified of the lien trial, the WCJ erred by issuing a Notice of Intention to Disallow Lien Claim instead of a Notice of Intention to Dismiss, and by dismissing the lien with prejudice. The lien is now dismissed without prejudice, acknowledging potential procedural errors by the WCJ.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantReconsiderationDismissal with PrejudiceNotice of Intention to DisallowNotice of Intention to DismissCompromise and ReleaseLien TrialGood CauseWithout Prejudice
References
3
Case No. ADJ2309063, 2603988
Regular
Jun 24, 2010

RAINIE JAEGER vs. APOTHE-CARE, INC., dba OWENS PHARMACY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT, WALGREEN'S, AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS, Fairmont Premier Insurance Company, American Motorist Insurance Company adjusted by Sedgwick

This case involves a dispute over a worker's compensation claim for a low back injury determined to be a compensable consequence of a prior bilateral carpal tunnel injury. The Board granted reconsideration to correct the date of the compensable consequence injury to October 5, 2004. Furthermore, Fireman's Fund was ordered to reimburse Sedgwick CMS for benefits paid after that date, with the right to seek contribution from Fairmont Premier/REM. The Board rescinded prior findings and substituted new ones, clarifying liability for medical treatment and benefits.

compensable consequence injurybilateral carpal tunnellow back injuryspinal surgeryAgred Medical Evaluator (AME)Fireman's FundSedgwick CMSjoint and several liabilityreimbursementcontribution
References
0
Case No. ADJ937954 (POM 0254711)
Regular
Aug 18, 2010

ANGELITA (ANGIE) FERNANDEZ vs. OAK TREE RACING ASSOCIATION, LOS ANGELES TURF CLUB, CADDIE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, CIGA by its servicing agent CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES for LEGION INSURANCE, in liquidation, CRAWFORD & COMPANY on behalf of ZURICH INSURANCE

This case involved an applicant claiming industrial injury to her shoulders and upper extremities. A prior insurer, Legion Insurance, erroneously paid benefits through its administrator, REM, before its insolvency. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the arbitrator's decision, which held Zurich Insurance (adjusted by Crawford & Company) liable for reimbursement to CIGA. This is because Zurich provided "other insurance" for a portion of the cumulative trauma injury, making it solely responsible for benefits where both an insolvent and solvent insurer would be liable. The Board found CIGA could recover pre-insolvency and mistaken payments, and Zurich's due process claims were unpersuasive.

CIGAZurich InsuranceCrawford & CompanyOak Tree Racing AssociationLegion InsuranceFremont Indemnitycumulative traumainsolvent insurersolvent insurerreimbursement
References
8
Showing 1-10 of 17 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational