CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ2706793 [SFO 0468588]
Regular
Nov 16, 2009

GUADALUPE RAMIREZ (DECEASED); and KATHRYN YOLKEN (Guardian ad Litem for minor dependents), JUAN JENOVEBO GARCIA (DECEASED); and KATHRYN YOLKEN (Guardian ad Litem for minor dependents), RAFAEL TAPIA, JR., minor; and KATHRYN YOLKEN (Guardian ad Litem), ROLANDO TAPIA (DECEASED); and KATHRYN YOLKEN (Guardian ad Litem for dependent minors) vs. ARGUS NEWSPAPER/ANG NEWSPAPERS; and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The WCAB rescinds its July 1, 2008 Findings of Fact and Order, and returns the case to the trial level for review and potential approval of the parties' proposed settlements.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDGuadalupe RamirezJuan Jeno'vebo GarciaRafael Tapia Jr.Rolando TapiaGuardian ad LitemArgus NewspaperLiberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCompromise and ReleaseFindings of Fact and Order
References
Case No. ADJ6733950
Regular
Jul 25, 2012

ANTHONY AVILA vs. MARK EVERETTE DRYWALL CO., EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case concerns an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of a dismissal order. The applicant argues his due process rights were violated because the dismissal for failure to appear was improper since his counsel was present at trial dates. The Appeals Board found that as the applicant was represented by counsel at trial, dismissal was erroneous. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal, and returned the matter to the trial level, also noting the unresolved request for counsel to withdraw.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseWCJdue processMandatory Settlement ConferencetrialMinutes of Hearingrelieved as counselNotice of Intention to Dismiss Casefailure to appear
References
Case No. ADJ9394433
Regular
Dec 04, 2017

JUAN MIGUEL GUTIERREZ GARCIA vs. JAMES AND SANDY HALL DBA GOOD GOODS, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a settlement proposed between the applicant and a lien claimant while the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration was pending before the Appeals Board. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior WCJ decision, and returned the case to the trial level. This action allows the WCJ to review the proposed settlement. The Board's order is not a final decision on the merits of the underlying issues.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLien ClaimantSettlementSupplemental Order Approving Compromise and ReleaseFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeTrial LevelRescindedReturned to Trial Level
References
Case No. ADJ6680842
Regular
Jan 31, 2013

BRUNO VARGAS vs. SELECT BUILD INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, GALLAGHER BASSETT

This case involves Applicant Bruno Vargas and Defendants Select Build Integrated Construction Services and Gallagher Bassett. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a previous WCJ decision. The Board rescinded that decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This order is not a final decision on the merits of the case.

WCABReconsiderationRescindedFurther ProceedingsWCJ DecisionAdministrative Law JudgeApplicantDefendantsIntegrated Construction ServicesGallagher Bassett
References
Case No. ADJ11826196
Regular
Oct 09, 2020

HUBER GARCIA vs. TESLA MOTORS, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has rescinded a prior WCJ decision in *Garcia v. Tesla Motors*. This action was taken because the parties have reached a proposed settlement while the case was pending on reconsideration. The matter is now returned to the trial level for the WCJ to review the settlement. If the settlement is not approved, the WCJ can reinstate the original decision, with the option for further reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationProposed SettlementRescind DecisionReturned to Trial LevelWCJAdministrative Law JudgeZurich North AmericaTesla MotorsADJ11826196
References
Case No. AHM 0109985
Regular
Aug 04, 2008

JOSE PERDOMO vs. ABC SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., ESIS

This case involves a dispute over a deposition scheduled by applicant's counsel, which defense counsel claims was erroneously set and misrepresented. The defendant sought removal of an order that took the case off calendar, alleging prejudice from applicant's counsel's representations. The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the off-calendar order, and returned the matter to the trial level to determine the conflicting factual claims regarding the deposition.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Off CalendarAppirionWCJDepositionApplicant CounselDefense CounselVerified AnswerReport and RecommendationTrial Level
References
Case No. ADJ769732 (SAL 0120813) ADJ4662339 (SAL 0083272) ADJ705266 (SAL 0094125) ADJ2433088 (SAL 0094126)
Regular
Jan 28, 2011

, Applicant, HENRY VEGA, vs. , Defendant(s). DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

The Appeals Board rescinded a prior award finding the applicant not yet permanent and stationary and ordered temporary disability indefinitely. This was because the applicant had multiple injuries with different application dates for the 104-week temporary disability cap under Labor Code section 4656(c)(2). The Board returned the case to the trial level to determine which specific injury or injuries caused the applicant's temporary disability. This clarification is necessary to correctly apply the statutory limitations on temporary disability payments.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings Award and OrdersTemporary DisabilityMaximum Medical ImprovementLabor Code section 4656(c)(2)104-week capAggregate disability paymentsDate of injuryTrial level
References
Case No. ADJ3601389 (STK 0210427)
Regular
Jan 09, 2014

CHRISTOPHER JAMERO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the dismissal of the applicant's case. The dismissal was for lack of prosecution after the applicant's attorney failed to respond to notices of intent to dismiss. The Board found that the attorney's repeated trips to Mexico to attend his gravely ill father, who subsequently passed away, constituted excusable neglect. Given the strong public policy favoring disposition on the merits and the constitutional mandate to achieve substantial justice, the Board determined the applicant should not be penalized for counsel's oversight. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder DismissingLack of ProsecutionNotice of Intention to DismissIndustrial InjuryField InspectorAgreed Medical ExaminerExcusable NeglectSubstantial JusticeProcedural Rules
References
Case No. ADJ16334598
Regular
Oct 13, 2025

ANTHONY REYES vs. XPO LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE

Applicant Anthony Reyes filed a petition for removal challenging an order by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that took the matter off calendar. The WCAB granted removal, determining that the WCJ's order violated the parties' right to due process by failing to create a record or explain the deferral of the additional panels issue, thus constituting irreparable harm. As a Decision After Removal, the Appeals Board rescinded the April 24, 2025, order taking the matter off calendar and returned the case to the trial level to establish a proper record. The Board explicitly stated it made no judgment on the merits of additional panels at this stage due to the lack of a formal record.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Matter Off CalendarAdditional PanelsDue Process ViolationIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceRecord CreationTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRescind Order
References
Showing 1-10 of 5,963 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational