Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Farkas v. Rumore

Union members and plaintiff Lawrence Farkas brought an action against Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc., Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union, Local 812, and its president Anthony Rumore. Plaintiffs alleged unlawful ratification of a collective bargaining agreement by the union and employer participation in the misconduct, under the LMRDA and LMRA. Plaintiff Farkas also claimed wrongful discharge by the employer and mishandling of his termination arbitration by the union. The court denied summary judgment for the LMRDA claims against the union regarding contract ratification but granted it for the LMRDA claim against Anthony Rumore. Summary judgment was also granted to Coca-Cola on the LMRA ratification claim. Furthermore, Farkas's individual claims for duty of fair representation against the union and breach of collective bargaining agreement against Coca-Cola were dismissed due to his failure to exhaust contractual remedies.

Labor LawLMRDALMRAUnion RightsCollective BargainingContract RatificationDuty of Fair RepresentationWrongful TerminationSummary JudgmentFederal Civil Procedure

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Diana Lynn TARRANT Et Al.

Allstate Insurance Company filed a declaratory judgment action to determine whether a van involved in an accident was covered under a commercial policy with higher liability limits or a personal policy with lower limits. The insured, Mr. Tarrant, denied instructing his agent to transfer the van to the personal policy. While the trial court found ratification by Mr. Tarrant, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals, holding that the insurance agent acted on behalf of the insurer, not the insured, making ratification impossible. Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled that Allstate is estopped from denying coverage under the commercial policy due to its agent's mistake in transferring the van.

Insurance Coverage DisputeAgent NegligenceContract RatificationEquitable EstoppelCommercial Insurance PolicyPersonal Insurance PolicyAutomobile LiabilityDeclaratory Judgment ActionAppellate ReviewAgency Law

References

Case No. 12-07-00260-CV

Regular Panel Decision

Jul 09, 2008

Keith Wells, Andria (Medley) Stewart, Blanche Phillips and Carrie Sterling v. Claude Dotson, Jr. and Wife, Faye Dotson

This appeal addresses a trial court's summary judgment regarding a "Lease with Options to Purchase" contract involving deceased Mildred Snow's estate and Claude Dotson, Jr. The appellants, heirs of Mildred Snow, challenged the judgment on grounds including specific performance under the Texas Probate Code, statute of limitations, ratification of fraud, and Faye Dotson's standing. The appellate court found Faye Dotson lacked standing and dismissed her from the case. It also reversed the specific performance ruling based on the Probate Code and reversed the summary judgment regarding the limitations defense, remanding that issue for further proceedings. However, the court affirmed the summary judgment in favor of Claude Dotson, Jr. on the ratification defense concerning the fraud in the inducement claim.

Contract DisputeReal PropertyEstate LawAppellate ReviewFraudWaiverEquitable RemediesLegal StandingDue ProcessTexas Law

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Bank of America, N.A. v. Prize Energy Resources, L.P.

This case concerns a dispute over the termination of an oil, gas, and mineral lease and a joint operating agreement in McMullen County, Texas. The Bank of America, as a lessor, sought rescission of a ratification agreement, alleging it was fraudulently induced to sign by Appellees, Prize Energy Resources, L.P. and the Rutherfords, who allegedly misrepresented the lease's status after a cessation of production. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Appellees, applying defenses such as ratification, waiver, quasi-estoppel, and adverse possession. The appellate court reversed the trial court's order, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding the Bank's knowledge of the alleged fraud, the applicability of equitable defenses, and the Appellees' claims of adverse possession. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the appellate opinion.

Oil and Gas LeaseMineral RightsLease TerminationFraudulent InducementContract RatificationWaiver (Legal Doctrine)Quasi-EstoppelAdverse PossessionSummary Judgment ReversalUnjust Enrichment

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Black v. Transport Workers Union

Plaintiffs, individual NYCTA employees and employee groups, sought to prevent the implementation of a collective bargaining agreement by the New York City Transit Authority and various union defendants. They argued that the contract was unlawfully ratified through "package ratification," which combined votes from NYCTA and MABSTOA employees, violating federal labor law (LMRDA § 101(a)(1)) and the unions' own governing documents. The court, presided over by District Judge Gagliardi, dismissed the complaint, ruling that the unions' long-standing practice of package ratification did not constitute a direct denial of voting rights under the LMRDA. Furthermore, the court found that the unions' interpretation and application of their ambiguous bylaws and constitution, consistently treating NYCTA and MABSTOA as a single bargaining unit since 1966, was reasonable and did not breach the duty of fair representation.

Collective BargainingLabor-Management Reporting and Disclosure ActUnion ReferendumContract RatificationVoting RightsDuty of Fair RepresentationPublic Employees' Fair Employment ActUnion BylawsUnion ConstitutionPackage Ratification

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Nov 09, 2000

St. Joseph Hospital v. Wolff

This case concerns the vicarious liability of St. Joseph Hospital, a teaching hospital, for the alleged negligence of Dr. Mario Villafani, a resident in its sponsored medical residency program. Stacy Wolff suffered severe brain damage after a tracheostomy performed by Villafani at Brackenridge Hospital. The Wolffs sued St. Joseph, alleging various theories of vicarious liability including employment, joint enterprise, joint venture, "mission," and ratification. The Supreme Court of Texas reversed the court of appeals' judgment, finding insufficient evidence to support the jury's findings on joint enterprise, joint venture, ratification, and "mission" liability. The Court also concluded that Villafani was acting as the borrowed employee of the Central Texas Medical Foundation (Foundation) as a matter of law, meaning St. Joseph was not vicariously liable for his actions.

Vicarious LiabilityJoint EnterpriseJoint VentureRespondeat SuperiorBorrowed EmployeeMedical MalpracticeResidency ProgramTeaching HospitalPhysician NegligenceHospital Liability

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Building Industry Fund v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

This Opinion and Order addresses defendant Local 3's motion for reconsideration, which the court treated as a new motion for summary judgment, regarding Count Eight of the complaint. The central issue revolves around the application of New York's Martin v. Curran rule, which requires proof of unanimous union membership authorization or ratification for tortious acts to hold an unincorporated labor union liable. Despite plaintiffs' arguments, the court affirmed the continued vitality of the Martin rule in New York. Finding that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate such unanimous authorization or ratification for either a letter-writing campaign or alleged violent acts, the court concluded that plaintiffs could not recover against Local 3 under state law. Consequently, Local 3's motion for summary judgment was granted, and Count Eight of the complaint was dismissed with prejudice.

Summary JudgmentReconsideration MotionLabor LawTortious InterferenceUnion LiabilityUnincorporated AssociationAuthorization and RatificationNew York LawFederal PreemptionPicket Line Violence

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Perreras v. Cia De Nav Mar Netumar

Plaintiff Emanuel Perreras (later identified as Emilio Ferreras) sued an unnamed shipowner for injuries sustained as a longshoreman. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting the claim was automatically assigned to the plaintiff's employer under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) because the plaintiff failed to initiate suit within six months of receiving a compensation award. The court confirmed that a claims examiner's memorandum constituted a valid award, triggering the six-month limitation period. However, the plaintiff argued that the claim was subsequently reassigned to him, providing a ratification letter from the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, the employer's workers' compensation carrier. Citing federal precedents, the court ruled that this ratification effectively revested the cause of action in the plaintiff, making him the real party in interest. Consequently, the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint was denied.

Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation ActLHWCAAssignment of ClaimReal Party in InterestRatificationMotion to DismissCPLR 3211Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 17(a)Workers' Compensation CarrierShipowner Liability

References

Case No. 04-13-00201-CV

Regular Panel Decision

Aug 29, 2014

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee of Bettye Baker Brown Trust, U/w, F/B/O William David Deiss, Bettye Baker Brown Trust U/w, F/B/O Diane Elizabeth Mysliweic, Bettye Baker Brown Trust U/W/, F/B/O Paula Jane Roberts, Dorothy Baker Shaw 1966 Trust, Baker E. v. Prize Energy Resources, L.P., Prize Operating Company, Gruy Petroleum Management Company N/K/A Cimarex Energy Co. of Colorado, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., Cimarex Energy Co., Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc., Pat R. Rutherford Jr., Michael G. Rutherford, Rut

This case, heard by the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, addresses a dispute over the termination of an oil, gas, and mineral lease and a joint operating agreement (JOA) in McMullen County. Appellants, led by Bank of America as trustee, contested a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Prize Energy Resources, concerning the alleged fraudulent inducement of a ratification agreement. The core issues involved the Bank's claims of waiver, ratification, quasi-estoppel, and adverse possession, all stemming from the belief that the Baker Lease terminated due to a cessation of production. The appellate court found genuine issues of material fact regarding the Bank's knowledge of fraud and its intent to waive its claims, as well as the applicability of quasi-estoppel and adverse possession. Consequently, the trial court's grant of summary judgment was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Oil and gas leaseJoint operating agreementMineral interestsLease terminationFraudulent inducementRatificationWaiverQuasi-estoppelAdverse possessionSummary judgment

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Legutko v. Local 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

This labor case involves plaintiffs, including Legutko and Arthur Mason, suing their employer Wallack Freight Lines, a local union, and an international union over alleged improprieties in union contract ratification and retaliatory actions. Plaintiffs claimed violations of federal labor laws (29 U.S.C. §§ 185, 411, 207, 215) and the union's constitution regarding voting procedures and overtime pay. The court dismissed the first five causes of action as time-barred under a six-month statute of limitations applied to claims related to contract ratification. While partially granting summary judgment to the employer on overtime claims, the court denied summary judgment on a claim of retaliatory threat against Legutko for protected activity. The court also denied the employer's motion to strike a jury demand and deemed the class certification motion moot due to the evolving nature of the case.

Labor LawUnion DisputesContract RatificationStatute of LimitationsOvertime PayRetaliation ClaimsFair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA)Union Member RightsCollective Bargaining Agreements

References

Showing 1-10 of 64 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Updated Daily

References

Showing 1-10 of 64 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.