CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 13-19-00500-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 14, 2021

Texas Auto Salvage, Inc., Gary Hack, and Daniel Hack v. D D Ramirez, Inc., Danny Ramirez Recycling, Inc., San Antonio Auto & Truck Salvage, Danny's Recycling & Precious Metals, LLC, Danny's Recycling, Inc., and Daniel Delagarza Ramirez

Appellants, Texas Auto Salvage, Inc., Gary Hack, and Daniel Hack (TASI), sued appellees, D D Ramirez, Inc., et al. (DDR), over a dispute regarding their neighboring metal recycling facilities in San Antonio. TASI alleged various claims including public and private nuisance, arguing DDR’s facilities were polluted and violated city ordinances, causing harm to TASI’s business and property. After a jury trial, the jury found against TASI on most claims, and the trial court granted DDR’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), issuing a take-nothing judgment. On appeal, TASI challenged the denial of injunctive relief and the JNOV on its public nuisance claim, as well as the exclusion of expert testimony and the factual insufficiency of evidence for its private nuisance claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, concluding that TASI lacked standing to bring its public and private nuisance claims as it failed to demonstrate a substantial special injury distinct from the public at large.

Public NuisancePrivate NuisanceStandingJudgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV)Injunctive ReliefMunicipal OrdinancesMetal Recycling FacilitiesEnvironmental RegulationsCode ViolationsBusiness Dispute
References
50
Case No. 05-18-00261-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 22, 2019

Richard Goldberg v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.

This case concerns an interlocutory appeal regarding the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) and its application to claims of breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation, and breach of fiduciary duty. Appellants, including Kenneth Goldberg and Geomet Recycling, appealed the denial of their motion to dismiss filed by Appellees, EMR entities. The dispute arose after Goldberg left EMR and established a competing scrap-metal recycling business, hiring former EMR employees. The Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially reversed the trial court's order, dismissing claims for damages related to communications with scrap-metal suppliers and the 'Pecan House incident' due to insufficient prima facie evidence. However, claims concerning electronic information transfer and communications with purchasers were upheld, partly due to the commercial-speech exemption. The court also addressed and rejected constitutional challenges to the TCPA.

Texas Citizens Participation ActTrade Secret MisappropriationBreach of ContractBreach of Fiduciary DutyTortious InterferenceCommercial Speech ExemptionEmployment DisputeScrap Metal RecyclingConfidential InformationElectronic Data Transfer
References
59
Case No. E2024-00741-COA-R3-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 02, 2025

CARBON FIBER RECYCLING, LLC v. TIMOTHY SPAHN

A Tennessee LLC, Carbon Fiber Recycling, LLC (CFR), sued its member, Timothy Spahn, seeking injunctive relief, monetary damages, and expulsion, alleging breaches of duty and misappropriation of trade secrets. The trial court dismissed the complaint, concluding it lacked jurisdiction and venue due to arbitration and forum selection clauses in the LLC's operating agreement, and that CFR failed to state a claim. The Court of Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the claims based on the arbitration provision, deferring arbitrability to the arbitrator. However, the appellate court reversed the trial court's finding of no jurisdiction or venue for temporary injunctive relief, determining that Tennessee law governs the operating agreement and the forum selection clause for injunctive relief was permissive, allowing CFR to seek a temporary restraining order in the Claiborne County Chancery Court. The case was remanded for reconsideration of the TRO.

Arbitration AgreementForum Selection ClauseInjunctive ReliefTrade Secrets MisappropriationLLC Operating AgreementChoice of LawContract InterpretationJudicial ExpulsionSubject Matter JurisdictionAppellate Review
References
31
Case No. 2014-03-0006
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 03, 2015

Scarbrough,Jeffrey v. Right Way Recycling, LLC

Jeffrey Scarbrough, an employee of Right Way Recycling, LLC, filed a Request for Expedited Hearing after sustaining an injury while attempting to move a trackhoe. The employer denied the claim, asserting willful misconduct and that the injury did not arise out of employment duties. The Court found that Mr. Scarbrough's actions, while potentially negligent, did not constitute willful misconduct and furthered the business interests of Right Way Recycling. Therefore, his injury was deemed to have arisen primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. The Court ordered Right Way Recycling, LLC to pay for Mr. Scarbrough's medical care and temporary total disability benefits for the period from July 24, 2014, to September 24, 2014.

Workers' CompensationWorkplace InjuryExpedited HearingWillful MisconductScope of EmploymentTemporary Total DisabilityMedical BenefitsPanel of PhysiciansAffirmative DefenseEmployer Liability
References
7
Case No. 2019-06-1559
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 05, 2020

Amaya, Tanya v. Sims Recycling Solutions, Inc.

An Expedited Hearing Order was issued by Judge Kenneth M. Switzer in the case of Tanya Amaya v. Sims Recycling Solutions, Inc. and Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn., Docket No. 2019-06-1559. At the hearing on February 4, 2020, the parties reached several agreements regarding Ms. Amaya's right shoulder injury and potential injury to her other shoulder. Sims Recycling offered a new panel of physicians for Ms. Amaya to choose from, as her previous authorized physician declined further treatment. Additionally, Ms. Amaya, who is self-represented, acknowledged her obligation to respond to written discovery. The Court ordered Ms. Amaya to promptly schedule an appointment with a chosen physician, provide discovery responses by February 18, 2020, and set a status conference for April 13, 2020, where Sims Recycling's Motion to Dismiss would also be heard.

Workers' CompensationExpedited HearingMedical TreatmentPhysician PanelDiscoverySelf-RepresentedShoulder InjuryStatus ConferenceMotion to DismissTennessee
References
0
Case No. 612067/18
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 11, 2026

Viana v. All Is. Recycle & Rubbish Removal

This case concerns a wrongful death action brought by Ruth Viana against Bellco Enterprises, Inc., among others, following an accident where her decedent was killed while working on Bellco's premises. The plaintiff alleged Bellco's negligence. Bellco moved for summary judgment, arguing it lacked authority to supervise the work and that no dangerous premises condition existed for which it had created or had notice. The Supreme Court granted Bellco's motion, dismissing the complaint against it. The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, concluding that Bellco established its prima facie case regarding lack of supervision and absence of a dangerous condition, which the plaintiff failed to rebut with a triable issue of fact.

Wrongful DeathNegligencePremises LiabilityIndependent ContractorSummary JudgmentAppellate ReviewControl of WorkDangerous ConditionActual NoticeConstructive Notice
References
8
Case No. 2023-07-5405
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 15, 2025

Taylor, Darlene v. Dale's Recycling

In this compensation appeal, the employer contested the award of death benefits to the surviving spouse of an employee who died from a heart attack while on duty. The employee, a truck driver, experienced a cardiac event after a traffic stop, involving both mental stress from the interaction and physical exertion to secure his load. The trial court found the heart attack primarily caused by these work-related factors, relying on expert medical opinion. The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board affirmed this decision, concluding that the evidence supported the determination of work-related causation despite the employee's pre-existing conditions, and that the combined stressors constituted an abnormal and unusual event in the context of his job.

Heart Attack CausationWorkers' Compensation Death BenefitsSurviving Spouse ClaimEmployee Cardiac EventJob-Related StressPhysical Exertion at WorkTraffic Stop StressorPre-existing Medical ConditionsExpert Medical TestimonyAppellate Review
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Duche v. Star Recycling

The plaintiffs appealed an order from the Supreme Court, Kings County, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing a wrongful death complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's decision. The defendants successfully demonstrated through documentary evidence that the decedent was injured during employment with New York Acquisition Sub, Inc., and that Marcilo Correa was a fellow employee. Additionally, Star Recycling, Allied Sanitation, and Resource Company were established as owned by New York Acquisition Sub, Inc. The court found that the plaintiffs could not sue the employer or fellow employee due to immunity under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter this immunity, and their request for postponed summary disposition lacked basis.

Wrongful DeathSummary JudgmentWorkers' Compensation ImmunityFellow Employee RuleEmployer LiabilityAppellate AffirmationDocumentary EvidenceKings County Supreme CourtNew York Acquisition Sub Inc.Waste Management of New York
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Allocco Recycling, Ltd. v. Doherty

Plaintiff Allocco Recycling, Ltd. subpoenaed non-party Urbitran Associates, Inc. for documents prepared for the New York City Department of Sanitation (DSNY). Defendant John Doherty, Commissioner of DSNY, moved to quash the subpoena and for a protective order, claiming the documents were irrelevant, unduly burdensome to produce, and protected by deliberative process privilege. Allocco cross-moved to compel production. This memorandum decision specifically addresses the deliberative process privilege claim, finding that the documents, which involve data collection and analysis by a government consultant, are purely factual and do not constitute advisory opinions or policy deliberations. Therefore, the court ruled that the documents are not protected by the deliberative process privilege.

Deliberative Process PrivilegeSubpoenaMotion to QuashProtective OrderMotion to CompelDiscoveryGovernment DocumentsFactual InformationAgency PolicyGovernment Consultant
References
24
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 01, 2005

Hernandez v. Excel Recycling Corp.

The claimant was injured in August 2003 while working for Excel Recycling Corporation and subsequently filed for workers' compensation benefits. During a hearing, the claimant admitted to purchasing a Social Security card to gain employment in the United States. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) established the case for the claimant's injuries and awarded benefits. The employer, Excel, and its carrier, the State Insurance Fund, appealed the WCLJ's decision to the Workers' Compensation Board, arguing that benefits should be denied due to the claimant's undocumented alien status under the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). The Board denied the application, stating that the IRCA issue was not raised before the WCLJ. The carrier then appealed this denial, but the appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the Board did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider an issue not timely raised at the WCLJ hearing, particularly since the carrier's argument was fact-dependent and its defense could be waived.

Workers' Compensation LawImmigration Reform and Control ActUndocumented WorkersPreemption DoctrineWaiver of DefensesAdministrative ProcedureAppellate ReviewWorkers' Compensation BoardJudicial DiscretionEmployer Liability
References
9
Showing 1-10 of 58 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational