Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Ehrlich v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.

The claimant appealed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision from September 17, 1987, which denied her claim for subsequent causally related disability benefits. She had previously sustained severe injuries in 1976 while working for Chock Full O’Nuts Corporation, leading to a schedule loss award. Her case was reopened after a 1978 reinjury, but a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found no further causally related disability in 1982 or 1985. The Board affirmed the 1985 decision, and the appellate court affirmed the Board’s determination, finding substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's decision, particularly in crediting medical opinions that discounted a subsequent causally related disability.

Workers' CompensationDisability BenefitsCausally Related DisabilitySchedule LossReinjuryBoard DecisionAppellate ReviewMedical EvidenceSubstantial EvidenceAffirmation

References

Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 02960

Regular Panel Decision

May 21, 2020

Matter of Robinson v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.

Jacqueline Robinson appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision denying her request to reclassify her disability from permanent partial to temporary total following back surgery. Established with a permanent partial disability in 2015 for a 2009 work-related back injury, Robinson underwent back surgery in June 2018 and sought reclassification. The Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) awarded temporary total disability payments for the post-surgery period up to the hearing date but reverted to permanent partial thereafter. The Board affirmed, finding no evidence that the surgery worsened her condition or caused "other trauma" or "significant reinjury." The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the Board's decision, concluding it was supported by substantial record evidence.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityTemporary Total DisabilityDisability ReclassificationBack InjurySurgical ImpactMedical Evidence ReviewSubstantial EvidenceWage-Earning CapacityAppellate Division

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Jul 05, 2011

Claim of Mucci v. New York State Department of Corrections

In December 1996, a claimant suffered a work-related left knee injury, and the case was closed in February 1998 after the last benefit payment in May 1997. Following a non-work-related reinjury in July 2009, the claimant sought a reopening of the 1996 case, prompting the employer's carrier to request a liability shift to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a. Both the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and the Board affirmed this shift. The Special Fund appealed, arguing the case was not truly closed due to a medical report anticipating future arthritic changes. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, ruling that the case was indeed truly closed in 1998 as no further proceedings or payments were contemplated.

Workers' CompensationSpecial Fund for Reopened CasesLiability ShiftCase ReopeningWork-Related InjuryKnee InjuryMedical PermanencyAppellate ReviewStatutory InterpretationSection 25-a

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Hamilton v. City of Schenectady

The case concerns an appeal from a judgment annulling the City of Schenectady's denial of General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits to a police officer. The officer, with a pre-existing back condition, sustained an on-duty injury in 1987 and subsequent reinjuries, leading to disability by March 1993, with the Workers' Compensation Board finding a causal relationship for the initial injury. Despite previous payments and acknowledgments, the City unilaterally ceased benefits, arguing the disability stemmed from the pre-existing condition, prompting a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The Supreme Court granted the petition, and the Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the City could not terminate benefits without a due process hearing, especially given the compelling evidence of a work-related causal link.

Police Officer DisabilityGeneral Municipal Law § 207-c BenefitsCPLR Article 78 ProceedingSpondylolisthesisBack InjuryOn-Duty AccidentWorkers' Compensation Board FindingUnilateral Benefit CessationDue Process HearingCausal Relationship

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Martin v. New York Telephone

This case concerns an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision regarding the liability for benefits. The claimant sustained a left knee injury in 1987 and a reinjury in 1995. A 1998 Section 32 settlement agreement released the employer from future claims for a lump sum, but required it to cover medical treatment. In 2004, the claimant developed a consequential right knee injury. The Workers' Compensation Board ultimately shifted liability for benefits to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under Workers' Compensation Law § 25-a, citing the passage of statutory timeframes. The Special Fund appealed, challenging its statutory liability and the employer's ongoing responsibility for medical expenses per the settlement. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, upholding the applicability of Section 25-a and noting the employer's statutory obligation for medical treatment.

Workers' Compensation Law § 25-aSpecial Fund for Reopened CasesSection 32 Settlement AgreementConsequential InjuryMedical Treatment LiabilityStatutory LiabilitySchedule Loss of UseAppellate ReviewTimelinessBoard Review

References

Showing 1-5 of 5 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Claim of Ehrlich v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.

Workers' CompensationDisability BenefitsCausally Related DisabilitySchedule LossReinjuryBoard DecisionAppellate ReviewMedical EvidenceSubstantial EvidenceAffirmation

Matter of Robinson v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.

Claim of Mucci v. New York State Department of Corrections

Workers' CompensationSpecial Fund for Reopened CasesLiability ShiftCase ReopeningWork-Related InjuryKnee InjuryMedical PermanencyAppellate ReviewStatutory InterpretationSection 25-a

Hamilton v. City of Schenectady

Claim of Martin v. New York Telephone