CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Eastern District Repetitive Stress Injury Litigation

The defendants sought to transfer 78 repetitive stress injury (RSI) cases from the Eastern District of New York to districts where the claims arose, also seeking severance of individual claims. Over 450 RSI cases, involving over 1,000 plaintiffs against more than 100 equipment manufacturers, were initially consolidated in the Eastern District. However, the Second Circuit later vacated the consolidation orders, finding it an abuse of discretion due to lack of common facts and varying state laws. Relying on this guidance, the court granted transfer in 75 cases and denied it in three, citing factors such as convenience of parties and witnesses, judicial economy, and the public interest in local adjudication of local controversies. The court also ordered severance where necessary to facilitate transfer.

Transfer of VenueMultidistrict LitigationRepetitive Stress InjuryProducts LiabilityForum Non ConveniensSeverance of ClaimsConsolidation of CasesJudicial EconomyWitness ConvenienceChoice of Forum
References
16
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Burroughs v. Northern Telecom, Inc.

The District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in a Memorandum and Order authored by District Judge Weinstein, addressed a motion to consolidate 44 repetitive stress injury (RSI) cases, alleging conditions such as Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from computer use, before a single judge. The court granted the motion for consolidation, assigning the cases to Judge Denis R. Hurley to oversee. Simultaneously, a motion by Northern Telecom, Inc. to transfer the *Burroughs* action to the Southern District of New York was denied. The decision highlighted the importance of early consolidation and coordinated case management, drawing parallels with asbestos and DES litigations, to enhance discovery efficiency, reduce transaction costs, and ensure equitable resolution of complex mass tort cases.

Repetitive Strain InjuryRSI CasesConsolidation of ActionsMultidistrict LitigationCarpal Tunnel SyndromeJudicial EconomyMass Tort LitigationTransfer of VenueFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureEastern District of New York
References
22
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 17, 1999

Claim of Currier v. Manpower, Inc.

Claimant, employed by Manpower, Inc., experienced back, buttocks, and leg pain from repetitive manual labor as a plastics inspector and punch machine operator between April 1995 and May 1996. Diagnosed with chronic lumbosacral strain and sciatica by her chiropractor, she filed for workers’ compensation benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board concluded that she sustained a causally related occupational disease, a decision appealed by Manpower and its carrier. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence supported the occupational disease determination and that timely notice was given under Workers’ Compensation Law § 45 for occupational diseases, rather than the 30-day requirement for accidental injuries under § 18.

Occupational diseaseWorkers' Compensation BoardRepetitive strain injuryLumbar strainSciaticaTimely noticeAppellate reviewSubstantial evidenceChiropractic treatmentEmployment injury
References
5
Case No. 2021-04-0171
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 14, 2022

Asberry, Whitney Rae v. Cummins Filtration

Ms. Whitney Rae Asberry, a production assistant, filed a workers' compensation claim against her employer, Cummins Filtration, alleging a left-arm injury from repetitive work. The authorized physician, Dr. John Turnbull, diagnosed an elbow strain but found no causal relationship between her symptoms and employment. Cummins denied the claim and filed a motion for summary judgment due to the lack of medical evidence supporting causation. Ms. Asberry failed to provide any contrary medical opinions or attend the motion hearing. The Court granted summary judgment for Cummins, dismissing Ms. Asberry's claim with prejudice, as she could not establish causation by expert medical opinion as required by law.

Workers' CompensationSummary JudgmentCausationMedical EvidenceEmployee ClaimEmployer DefenseInjury DismissalRepetitive TraumaOrthopedic ExaminationExpert Witness
References
2
Case No. 532849
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 10, 2022

Matter of Patalan v. PAL Envtl.

Jerzy Patalan, an asbestos handler, sought workers' compensation benefits for alleged work-related injuries to his back, neck, knees, wrists, and left foot, attributing them to repetitive strain. The Workers' Compensation Board denied his claim, finding no causal link between his employment and injuries. On appeal, the Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the Board's decision. The court highlighted that neither Patalan's testimony nor the medical reports from his treating physiatrist, Leonard Bleicher, or the carrier's orthopedic surgeon, provided sufficient evidence of a recognizable link to a distinctive feature of his employment due to a lack of specific knowledge about his job duties. Consequently, the Board's finding that Patalan did not meet the requirements for an occupational disease was supported by substantial evidence.

Occupational DiseaseWorkers' Compensation BenefitsCausal LinkRepetitive Strain InjuryMedical TestimonyAppellate ReviewSubstantial EvidenceAsbestos HandlerBack InjuryKnee Injury
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Rosario v. AIG

Claimant, an accountant, ceased working in 1998 and later applied for workers' compensation benefits for repetitive strain injuries, with the claim established in 2001 for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. In 2006, the parties stipulated that claimant was permanently partially disabled. The employer's carrier subsequently sought to determine if claimant was actively seeking employment within her medical restrictions. Initially, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge denied the application to suspend benefits, finding no voluntary withdrawal from the labor market. However, the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed this, concluding claimant had voluntarily withdrawn by failing to search for work within her medical restrictions. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, citing substantial evidence that the claimant admitted to not searching for work for an extended period, despite being capable of performing sedentary work.

Workers' CompensationVoluntary WithdrawalLabor Market AttachmentPermanent Partial DisabilityCarpal Tunnel SyndromeRepetitive Motion InjurySedentary WorkEmployment SearchBoard DecisionAppeal
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Hannon v. Ellicott Square Associates

This case concerns an appeal from a Workmen's Compensation Board decision filed November 22, 1974. The board had found that prolonged emotional stress and strain contributed to the death of a 50-year-old building manager, whose existing hypertensive cardiovascular disease was exacerbated by the stress. The stress stemmed from a portion of his building's cornice falling, leading to the manager's collapse and subsequent death from a massive intercerebral hemorrhage. Medical experts provided conflicting testimony regarding the causality between the emotional strain and death. However, the Board, exercising its fact-finding powers, accepted the opinion that the emotional strain was an unusual factor contributing to his fatal attack. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding it was supported by substantial medical evidence and should not be disturbed.

emotional stresshypertensive cardiovascular diseaseintercerebral hemorrhageworkplace accidentmedical causalitycompensable deathWorkers' Compensation Lawsubstantial evidenceBoard decision affirmedcoronary heart disease
References
4
Case No. 2019-08-0045
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 14, 2020

Mask, Michael v. Hub Group, Inc.

Employee Michael Mask, a truck driver, suffered a low back injury at work but was subsequently diagnosed with multiple myeloma. The employer, Hub Group, Inc., provided workers' compensation benefits for the back strain but denied further benefits for conditions related to his cancer, asserting it was not work-related. Mask sought additional medical and disability benefits, arguing his ongoing pain was connected to the work injury. The trial court, Judge Allen Phillips presiding, found Mask only established entitlement to benefits for his low back strain and not for temporary or permanent disability or cancer-related treatment, crediting Dr. Wolf's opinion that his pain stemmed from cancer. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding Mask was only entitled to reasonable and necessary future medical care for his low back strain, thereby denying benefits for cancer or additional disability.

Workers' CompensationBack InjuryMultiple MyelomaCausationMedical BenefitsDisability BenefitsTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityAppeals BoardPro Se Litigant
References
5
Case No. 2018-06-0018
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 26, 2018

Coon, Gerald v. Commercial Warehouse and Cartage, Inc.

Gerald C. Coon, an employee, filed a request for temporary disability and medical benefits after an alleged back injury on September 22, 2017, due to a malfunctioning safety lanyard at Commercial Warehouse and Cartage, Inc. (CWC). Mr. Coon claimed continuous pain and denial of medical treatment by CWC. However, CWC witnesses testified Mr. Coon did not exhibit pain or request medical care until November 19, 2017. The Court found Mr. Coon's testimony not credible. Medical opinions varied, with Dr. Robert Carver, a panel physician, determining Mr. Coon's conditions (degenerative disc disease and lumbosacral radiculopathy) were not work-related. Dr. William M. Gavigan diagnosed a work-related lumbar strain but a non-work-related disc herniation. The Court credited Dr. Gavigan's opinion as most persuasive, confining the compensable injury to a lumbar strain, and found Mr. Coon unlikely to prevail on entitlement to additional medical treatment or temporary disability benefits, as no doctor took him off work for the strain. The Court, therefore, denied Mr. Coon's request for benefits.

Workers' CompensationBack InjuryLumbar StrainDegenerative Disc DiseaseLumbosacral RadiculopathyMedical CausationCredibility AssessmentExpedited HearingTemporary Disability BenefitsMedical Benefits
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 18, 1971

Claim of Bernsley v. Telemarine Communications Co.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which allowed a claim for death benefits. The decedent, a principal in the appellant corporation, died from cardiac failure during an emotional discussion about a vault tax assessed against a related corporation and paid by the appellant. The board found that the tax problems arose from decedent's employment with the appellant and that the emotional strain caused his death. The court affirmed the board’s finding that the problems over the vault tax arose out of and during the course of decedent’s employment and that the emotional strain and anxiety from dealing with the tax problems caused decedent’s death.

Death benefitsCardiac failureEmotional strainEmployment-related deathVault taxWorkmen's Compensation Board appealCausationSubstantial evidenceEmployer liability
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 314 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational