CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1210556 (AGO 0018589)
Regular
Oct 10, 2008

EDWIN MILLER vs. KEEBLER COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for removal and granted reconsideration of the WCJ's prior decisions regarding medical mileage and penalties. The Board found the WCJ failed to properly consider statutory factors in determining a "reasonable geographic area" for the applicant's medical treatment. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's decisions and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision addressing all outstanding issues, including the definition of a reasonable geographic area for treatment.

WCABPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationMedical MileageReasonable Geographic AreaLabor Code Section 4600Administrative Director Rule 9780(h)WCJBoltonRamirez
References
2
Case No. ADJ832058 (VNO 0431183) ADJ2725399 (VNO 0431180)
Regular
Jan 06, 2011

JUDITH VOLKERTS vs. JON B. ARTZ, SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the administrative law judge's (WCJ) order rescinding a prior decision due to improper service by the WCAB. The original decision denied the applicant's request to set aside a compromise and release agreement. Because the WCAB failed to properly serve the applicant, the WCJ retained jurisdiction and had the authority to rescind the decision. The case is remanded for further proceedings, including a new decision that must be properly served.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSeabright Insurance CompanyCIGACalifornia Compensationliquidationreconsiderationadministrative law judgerescinded orderservice of processcompromise and release
References
3
Case No. ADJ3107843 (MON 0208626)
Regular
Oct 05, 2009

CHRIS DERBOGHOSSIAN vs. ALL TUNE & LUBE, ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRAWFORD & COMPANY

The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision except for the attorney's fees award for the applicant's wife deposition; the contempt order was rescinded as the WCJ lacked authority to address indirect contempt.

WCABremovalreconsiderationdisqualificationcontemptindirect contemptLabor Code section 5814transportation expenseattorney feesmedical treatment
References
11
Case No. ADJ3653158 (MON 0338459)
Regular
Jul 16, 2010

SOBEYDA M. LOPEZ (JARKINS) vs. J&M SALES, INC., ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, finding that the WCJ improperly rescinded her prior decision. Lien claimants' petition for reconsideration was denied as it was untimely filed, making the WCJ's initial December 16, 2009 decision final. The WCAB rescinded the WCJ's subsequent orders of January 27, 2010, and April 28, 2010, thereby reinstating the December 16, 2009 decision which disallowed the lien claimants' claims. The WCAB also found the lien claimants' objection to the WCJ's intent to submit on the record to be untimely filed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLien ClaimantsWCJ AuthorityRescission of OrderTimeliness of FilingLabor Code Section 5903Jurisdictional Time LimitFinal OrderBoard Rule 10859
References
10
Case No. ADJ9460638
Regular

DAVID HAMALIAN vs. HANSEL FORD, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration regarding a WCJ's order that rescinded a prior finding of no material defect in the defendant's Utilization Review (UR). This decision was based on a subsequent en banc ruling, *Dubon II*, which held that UR decisions are invalid only if untimely. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's Amended Findings & Order and remanded the case for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with *Dubon II*. The prior finding that the UR was not materially defective was rescinded, and the matter will be reheard to determine the UR's timeliness and applicant's need for surgery.

Utilization ReviewMaterial DefectDubon IDubon IIPetition for ReconsiderationFindings & OrderRescindedAdministrative Law JudgeAppeals BoardEn Banc Decision
References
3
Case No. ADJ7818556
Regular
Nov 20, 2017

MARCOS CAMACHO vs. PIREATE STAFFING, LUMBERMEN'S INDEMNITY, In Liquidation, Administered By CIGA, EXCLUSIVE TENT RENTALS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found the WCJ erred by drawing a negative inference and barring recovery based on the applicant's assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding Social Security numbers. The Board determined this assertion does not inherently undermine credibility or the claim's legitimacy. Crucially, the parties had stipulated to an industrial injury to the applicant's back, but the WCJ's flawed reasoning prevented any determination on apportionment, making the decision incomplete.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryBack InjuryHipsLower ExtremitiesPsycheFifth AmendmentSelf-Incrimination
References
1
Case No. ADJ2765298 (RIV 0026091)
Regular
Aug 13, 2010

PETE SORIA vs. FLEETWOOD ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation

The WCAB granted reconsideration and rescinded a WCJ's order awarding costs to lien claimants. The WCJ's original order lacked a proper evidentiary hearing, a summary of evidence, and an opinion explaining the grounds for the decision, violating due process and Board rules. The Board found the WCJ's subsequent attempt to rescind the order was untimely. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including an evidentiary hearing and a properly documented decision.

ADJ2765298RIV 0026091ReconsiderationLien ConferenceWCJ OrderStipulated AwardPermanent Total DisabilityRemovalRescinding OrderEvidentiary Hearing
References
1
Case No. ADJ9510116
Regular
Apr 06, 2016

SUNRISE TERRACE MOBILEHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION vs. ICW Group/Explorer Insurance Company, Williamsburg National Insurance, Tower Select Insurance

Explorer Insurance Company sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision awarding vocational expert costs. The parties had previously settled underlying claims for $30,000, with the C&R leaving the decision on vocational expert costs to the WCJ. Explorer argued the WCJ erred in awarding uncertain costs, failing to list all case numbers, and not awarding costs against all defendants. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter to the trial level due to the unclear identification of liable carriers across the multiple case numbers and differing insurance coverage stipulations. The WCJ will need to conduct further proceedings to definitively identify liable parties and address a stipulation resolving contribution.

Vocational expert costsOrder Approving Compromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationReport and RecommendationJoint and several liabilityThird-party administratorSubstantial evidenceStipulationCumulative injuryContribution
References
1
Case No. ADJ2065472
Regular
Aug 15, 2013

CARLOS DURAN vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, SEDGWICK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of the WCJ's prior decision in *Carlos Duran v. Ralphs Grocery Company*. The WCAB rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision. This action means the prior decision is no longer in effect and the case will be reheard by the WCJ. The parties retain their rights to seek further reconsideration of any new decision.

WCABReconsiderationRescindedReturned to Trial LevelFurther ProceedingsWCJ DecisionAdministrative Law JudgeRalphs Grocery CompanySedgwickCarlos Duran
References
0
Case No. ADJ9264230, ADJ10303901
Regular
Jan 04, 2019

ANA MOSTAFANIA vs. KINECTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of the WCJ's October 23, 2018 decision. The WCAB rescinded that decision, adopting the WCJ's report in full. The matter is now returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This order is not a final determination on the merits of the case.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationRescission of DecisionReturn to Trial LevelFurther ProceedingsDecision After ReconsiderationWCJ ReportAdministrative Law JudgeKinecta Federal Credit Union
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 24,731 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational