CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litig.

This multi-district litigation addresses defendant Allergan's alleged actions to improperly delay the market entry of generic competitors to its dry-eye medication Restasis®. End-Payor Plaintiffs (EPPs), representing health and welfare funds, assert they overpaid due to Allergan's monopolistic conduct, including filing sham citizen petitions, defrauding the USPTO, and using tribal sovereign immunity. Allergan moved to dismiss various state antitrust and consumer protection claims. The court, presided over by Judge Nina Gershon, granted in part and denied in part Allergan's motion, dismissing some claims (e.g., Missouri, Pennsylvania, Vermont due to standing or reliance requirements, and portions of Arkansas claims post-August 1, 2017) while allowing others to proceed (e.g., Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, Tennessee, Wisconsin, California, Colorado).

Antitrust LawConsumer ProtectionMonopolizationGeneric DrugsPatent InfringementSham LitigationRule 12(b)(6) MotionIndirect PurchasersState Law ClaimsMulti-District Litigation
References
60
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

1199seiu Nat'l Benefit Fund v. Allergan, Inc. (In re Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litig.)

This multi-district litigation addresses defendant Allergan's alleged anticompetitive efforts to delay FDA approval of generic versions of its dry-eye medication, Restasis®. Plaintiffs, comprising Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and End-Payor Plaintiffs, contend Allergan engaged in various unlawful strategies, including filing sham citizen petitions, defrauding the USPTO to secure "second-wave" patents, wrongfully listing these patents, initiating sham patent infringement lawsuits, and transferring patents to a Native American tribe to invoke sovereign immunity. Allergan moved to dismiss the consolidated complaints, asserting that plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege that its actions caused any delay in generic market entry. The court, however, denied Allergan's motion, concluding that the plaintiffs had adequately pleaded that Allergan's aggressive and persistent tactics could have effectively delayed competition.

AntitrustPharmaceutical IndustryGeneric DrugsFDA ApprovalPatent InfringementCitizen PetitionsHatch-Waxman ActMonopolyRestasisDry Eye Medication
References
34
Showing 1-2 of 2 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational