CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ3795048
Regular
Feb 11, 2010

PAULINE WATKINS vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case involves Pauline Watkins, the applicant, and the County of San Diego, the defendant, regarding a workers' compensation claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has issued an order denying a Petition for Reconsideration filed by one of the parties. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report in making its decision to deny reconsideration. Therefore, the original decision in this workers' compensation matter stands.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeDeniedCounty of San DiegoPauline WatkinsADJ3795048SDO 0342816Frank M. BrassJames C. Cuneo
References
Case No. ADJ7243389
Regular
Dec 31, 2019

JOSE MARTINEZ vs. MATTHEW LAWRENCE CONSTRUCTION, INC., GRANITE STATE INSURANCE CO., CHARTIS SAN DIEGO (Adjusting Agent), Martin Lawrence, Yvonne Lawrence, ACA Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct procedural errors. The Board rescinded the prior finding that the applicant was not working for the construction company, as this issue was not properly before the original judge. New parties, the individual property owners and their insurance carrier, have been joined. The case is returned to the trial level for a determination of all employment relationships and potential coverage issues.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMatthew Lawrence ConstructionGranite State Insurance Co.Chartis San DiegoJose Martinezemployeeindependent contractorreconsiderationfinding of factrescinded
References
Case No. ADJ10138122
Regular
Aug 28, 2025

Tinomeneta Taupau vs. State of California, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility; Legally Uninsured, with Claims Adjusted by State Compensation Insurance Fund

The petitioner has withdrawn the Petition for Removal of the decision issued on June 18, 2025. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has ordered that the Petition for Removal is dismissed.

Petition for RemovalWithdrawnDismissedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITYLEGALLY UNINSUREDSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDAdjudication NumberSan Diego District OfficeCCPOA BENEFIT TRUST FUND
References
Case No. ANA 0347858
Regular
Sep 12, 2008

KEYIN L. ROSS vs. SAN DIEGO CHARGERS and LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (CIGA), SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, KANSAS CITY CHIEFS, TIG

The WCA's decision is affirmed for two reasons: Kansas City is wrong in claiming that San Diego was self-insured, and CIGA's statutes preclude Kansas City from recovering from San Diego.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCIGALegion Insurance CompanyKansas City ChiefsSan Diego Chargerscontributioninsolvent insurercovered claimsInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(5)deductible reimbursement
References
Case No. ADJ6853853
Regular
Oct 05, 2012

KYB FUGFUGOSH vs. SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a finding that San Quentin State Prison committed serious and willful misconduct. The applicant, an inmate kitchen worker, sustained a right shoulder injury on June 18, 2008, after being ordered to work despite presenting medical documentation of his injury and post-surgical condition. The Board upheld the Administrative Law Judge's finding that prison officials' failure to acknowledge and act on the applicant's medical limitations constituted a reckless disregard for his safety, proximately causing his injury. The employer's arguments regarding perjured testimony and newly discovered evidence were rejected.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSan Quentin State PrisonState Compensation Insurance Fundserious and willful misconductadmitted injurykitchen workerarthroscopic acromioplastyrotator cuff tearsfailure to reportinmate request for interview
References
Case No. ADJ6963370
Regular
Sep 22, 2010

MARTIN GARRISON vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant Martin Garrison. The Board has reviewed the petition and the Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) Report and Recommendation. For the reasons stated in the WCJ's report, which the Board adopts, the petition is dismissed as untimely. If it were not dismissed for timeliness, it would have been denied on the merits based on the WCJ's reasoning.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissedUntimelyReport and RecommendationWCJWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeADJ6963370County of San DiegoPSI
References
Case No. ADJ11428234
Regular
Oct 17, 2025

RAMON COLLADO vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTINELA STATE PRISON

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to study the factual and legal issues in Ramon Collado's case against the California Department of Corrections and Centinela State Prison. Collado sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings and Order from July 28, 2021, which concluded he failed to prove an industrially caused heart/hypertension injury between December 20, 2012, and August 14, 2018. The Board found the Qualified Medical Evaluator's opinion on whether Collado's condition was an aggravation or mere exacerbation of prior injuries was unclear and contradictory, failing to constitute substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings, including the development of the medical record and a determination on the applicability of Labor Code section 3212 presumptions.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardRamon ColladoCalifornia Department of CorrectionsCentinela State PrisonState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings and Orderworkers' compensation administrative law judgeindustrially caused injuryexacerbation
References
Case No. SDO 0316261
Regular
Jul 30, 2007

Marva Smith vs. SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Marva Smith's petition to disqualify the administrative law judge (WCJ). Smith argued the WCJ had a conflict of interest due to prior employment with SCIF, which she claimed was a former claims processor for her employer, and that the WCJ might be a material witness. The Board found no evidence connecting the WCJ's prior employment to the current case or establishing her as a material witness, thus denying the disqualification petition.

Petition for DisqualificationWCJState Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF)Conflict of InterestPrior EmploymentMaterial WitnessDisputed Evidentiary FactsAdministrative Law JudgeWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB)San Diego State University
References
Showing 1-10 of 5,263 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational