CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1115532 (SAC 0347195)
Regular
May 09, 2011

PAUL RIGGS vs. SACRAMENTO RIVER CATS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the original Findings and Award. The Board found that the applicant met the six-month employment threshold for a compensable psychiatric injury, reversing the prior finding that he did not. Issues regarding permanent disability and attorney's fees were deferred for further proceedings. The matter was returned to the trial judge for a new decision consistent with this opinion.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPaul RiggsSacramento River CatsState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationFindings and AwardPsychiatric InjurySix-Month Employment RuleLabor Code Section 3208.3Sudden and Extraordinary Injury
References
Case No. ADJ10737420, ADJ11230735
Regular
May 28, 2019

METHVEN BROWN (Deceased), JANINE BROWN (Widow) vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Permissibly Self-Insured, SACRAMENTO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding no industrial injury to the decedent's heart or cerebrovascular system. The widow argued the administrative law judge erred by disallowing further discovery from a cardiologist. However, the Board adopted the judge's report, which noted a neurologist already testified that heart trouble and industrial stress were not medically probable causes of the decedent's stroke and death. The applicants failed to demonstrate why a cardiologist would be more competent to offer such opinions.

Methven BrownJanine BrownCounty of SacramentoSacramento County Probation DepartmentADJ10737420ADJ11230735Petition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings and Orderindustrial injuryheart injury
References
Case No. ADJ481349 (SAC 0357393), ADJ1911129 (SAC 0357544), ADJ7331702
Regular
Jun 18, 2015

MARIA TACLAY vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO WORKERS' COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a WCJ's finding that actual employment events on two separate dates substantially caused the applicant's psychiatric injury. The defendant, County of Sacramento, sought reconsideration, arguing that separate claims could not be combined to meet the predominant cause threshold. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and upheld the original award. The decision confirms that multiple employment events, even from distinct claims, can collectively establish industrial causation for a psychiatric injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactOrder and AwardWCJPsychiatric InjuryIndustrial InjuryPredominant CauseSubstantial CauseActual Events of Employment
References
Case No. ADJ3526765 (SAC 0226620)
Regular
May 14, 2012

GARY HORAT vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Gary Horat's Petition for Reconsideration in the case against the County of Sacramento. The Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Horat's supplemental pleading was considered but did not alter the decision. Therefore, the Board's order denied the petition for reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeDeny ReconsiderationSupplemental PleadingCal. Code Regs. tit. 8§ 10848County of SacramentoGary HoratADJ3526765
References
Case No. ADJ7103630
Regular
May 21, 2012

DENISE SANCHES vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

This case involves Denise Sanches' workers' compensation claim against the County of Sacramento. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Sanches' Petition for Removal as untimely. The dismissal was based on the petition being filed on March 8, 2012, which was more than the allowed 25 days after the February 13, 2012, decision. This delay violated the time limits prescribed by 8 Cal. Code Regs. § 10843 and Code of Civil Procedure § 1013.

Petition for RemovalUntimelyDecision DateFiling Date25 Days20 Days8 Cal. Code Regs. 10843Code of Civil Procedure § 1013Served by MailDismissed
References
Case No. ADJ 7238353
Regular
Apr 13, 2012

ARTHUR CANNON vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a January 24, 2012 decision in the case of Arthur Cannon vs. City of Sacramento. The WCAB determined that reconsideration was necessary due to statutory time constraints and an initial review of the record. This action will allow for further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. All future communications regarding this case must be filed in writing with the Office of the Commissioners.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationElectronic Adjudication Management SystemCity of SacramentoArthur CannonStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decision
References
Case No. ADJ4350794
Regular
Jun 07, 2011

Harold J. Rucker vs. County of Sacramento

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Harold J. Rucker's Petition for Reconsideration in this case against the County of Sacramento. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report. They specifically acknowledged considering Rucker's supplemental petition. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration was officially denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law Judge ReportSupplemental PetitionDeny ReconsiderationCal.Code Regs. tit. 8 § 10848County of SacramentoHarold J. RuckerADJ4350794SAC 0361547
References
Case No. ADJ987086 (SAC 0363033)
Regular
Sep 29, 2000

ROBERT THORNBURG vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Permissibly Self-Insured

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted the defendant County of Sacramento's petition for reconsideration of a prior decision. This action is necessary to allow the Board sufficient time to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues presented in the case. The WCAB intends to issue a just and reasoned decision after further study and potential proceedings. All future communications regarding this matter must be directed to the WCAB's Office of the Commissioners.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCounty of SacramentoPermissibly Self-InsuredStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersSan Francisco
References
Case No. ADJ9216410
Regular
Dec 28, 2020

RAMON CHACON ALCALA vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL

This case involves a Sacramento County Jail inmate, Ramon Chacon Alcala, who claims an industrial injury to his back and groin from lifting dough in the jail bakery. Although the applicant's credibility as a historian was questioned, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge who concluded that medical evidence from examining physicians provided substantial support for an industrial injury. Despite applicant's credibility issues, the physicians' opinions on causation based on reasonable medical probability were deemed sufficient to uphold the award.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjurySacramento County JailInmateBakeryHerniaBack InjuryQualified Medical Examiner
References
Case No. ADJ2135528 (VNO 0550980)
Regular
May 22, 2015

NUREN KARTAL vs. THREE HANDS CORPORATION, OAK RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the defendants, Three Hands Corporation and Oak River Insurance Company. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has dismissed the petition. This dismissal is based on the WCJ's report, which found the petition moot because the WCJ issued a corrected award superseding the original one. Therefore, the WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning and dismissed the reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ reportmootSecond Amended Supplemental FindingsFirst Amended Joint FindingsApplicantDefendantInsurance CompanyAdministrative Law Judge
References
Showing 1-10 of 305 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational