CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2018 NY Slip Op 04944 [162 AD3d 1777]
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 29, 2018

Matter of Town of Tonawanda (Town of Tonawanda Salaried Workers Assn.)

This case involves an arbitration matter between the Town of Tonawanda, as Respondent, and the Town of Tonawanda Salaried Workers Association, as Appellants. The Appellants' motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was denied by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. The decision was rendered on June 29, 2018.

ArbitrationMotion to appealLeave to appealDenialAppellate practiceLabor lawPublic employmentCollective bargainingFourth DepartmentCourt of Appeals (denied)
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Local 323 v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine & Furniture Workers

Plaintiffs, Local 323 and its officers, initiated a lawsuit against the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers (IUE). They alleged that the IUE unlawfully denied Local 323's right to disaffiliate, claiming the IUE amended its constitution to obstruct disaffiliation and breached its own rules in denying their application. Plaintiffs sought judicial enforcement of disaffiliation, retention of assets, an injunction, and damages. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting various defenses, including the plaintiffs' failure to exhaust internal union remedies. The court ultimately granted the defendant's motion, concluding that Local 323 had not exhausted its available administrative remedies within the union, a prerequisite for pursuing the claims in federal court, given the internal nature of the dispute.

Union DisaffiliationLabor LawLMRALMRDAExhaustion of Administrative RemediesInternal Union DisputeMotion to DismissBreach of ContractFederal Court JurisdictionUnion Constitution
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 20, 1992

Town of Newburgh v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n

This case involves an appeal concerning an arbitration award related to a collective bargaining agreement. The petitioner sought to vacate an arbitrator's award that mandated salary increases for incumbent typist employees to match a new hire's salary rate. The respondent, Civil Service Employees Association, cross-petitioned to confirm the award. The Supreme Court denied the petition and confirmed the award. On appeal, the judgment was modified; the appellate court vacated the portion of the arbitration award concerning the specific salary increase and remitted the matter to the arbitrator. The court affirmed that the timeliness of a grievance is an arbitrator's domain but found the arbitrator exceeded authority by fashioning a remedy outside the collective bargaining agreement's explicit limitations. The case was remitted for a modified award consistent with the agreement's terms.

Arbitration AwardCollective Bargaining AgreementSalary DisputeExceeding AuthorityProcedural TimelinessJudicial ReviewContractual LimitationsGrievance ProcedureTypist SalariesAppellate Review
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Greece Support Service Employees Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board

This case concerns an appeal regarding the proper application of Civil Service Law § 209-a (1) (e) to salary provisions in an expired collective bargaining agreement between an unnamed petitioner and the Greece Central School District. The agreement, from July 1992 to June 1995, included cost-of-living adjustments for salary schedules during its term. After the agreement expired, the District continued existing salary schedules but ceased further cost-of-living adjustments for 1995-1996, prompting the petitioner to file an improper practice charge. The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) reversed an Administrative Law Judge's decision, concluding that the agreement did not mandate continued cost-of-living adjustments post-expiration. The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's subsequent CPLR article 78 petition seeking annulment of PERB's determination. The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's judgment, deferring to PERB's expertise and finding its interpretation that the adjustments were limited to the agreement's term to be reasonable and legally permissible.

Collective Bargaining AgreementSalary AdjustmentCost-of-Living AdjustmentPublic EmployerImproper Practice ChargeCivil Service LawPublic Employment Relations BoardJudicial ReviewCPLR Article 78Statutory Interpretation
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cox v. Home Insurance

Virginia Cox filed a claim against The Home Insurance Company ("Home") under the Equal Pay Act ("EPA"), alleging gender-based wage discrimination. Cox contended that as a Field Claims Representative (FCR), she was paid less than male counterparts performing substantially similar tasks. Home filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that any wage differentials were due to legitimate business reasons, such as varying job duties, experience, education, and its Salary Administration and Policy Guide. The court found that Home successfully established its affirmative defense, providing sufficient evidence that salary disparities were unrelated to gender and were determined by objective factors like experience, education, and job responsibilities. Cox failed to provide competent summary judgment evidence to challenge the bona fides of Home's salary guide or demonstrate its discriminatory application. Consequently, the court granted Home's motion for summary judgment and denied Cox's claims for relief.

Equal Pay ActGender DiscriminationWage DifferentialSummary JudgmentAffirmative DefenseSalary Administration PolicyJob ClassificationField Claims RepresentativeEmployment LawFederal Civil Procedure
References
24
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Williams v. Galveston Independent School District

Plaintiffs Patricia Williams and Terri Watkins, African-American employees of the Galveston Independent School District (GISD), filed a lawsuit alleging race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. They claimed that GISD paid them less than two white coworkers, E.J. Garcia and Paul McLarty, despite having substantially similar job responsibilities. Williams also included a retaliation claim, which Watkins later joined. The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for discriminatory compensation, concluding that their positions were not substantially similar to those of their white colleagues, even though they were in the same pay grade. Furthermore, the Court accepted GISD's explanations for salary disparities, which cited additional responsibilities assumed by the white employees and an effort to align salaries with market rates based on a Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) Salary Study, as legitimate and nondiscriminatory. Consequently, the Court granted GISD's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all of the plaintiffs' claims with prejudice, including Watkins's retaliation claim, which she conceded should be dismissed.

DiscriminationEmployment LawSalary EquitySummary JudgmentSection 1981Burden-ShiftingPretextTexasSchool AdministrationRacial Discrimination
References
22
Case No. 2021 NY Slip Op 03888 [195 AD3d 1270]
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 17, 2021

Matter of Spence v. State Univ. of N.Y.

This case involves an appeal concerning a salary increase for nurses at Stony Brook University Hospital, initiated by the State University of New York. Petitioners, including Wayne Spence and the New York State Public Employees Federation, argued that the salary adjustments violated Education Law and Civil Service Law due to an inadequate study, and Executive Law and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act due to disparate impact on older nurses. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding the study sufficient and the age discrimination claims procedurally deficient. The Appellate Division affirmed this dismissal, concluding that the study was representative, the nonuniform pay differential was permissible under Education Law, and the age discrimination claims failed because petitioners did not file with the EEOC and the pay adjustments were based on a legitimate non-age factor.

Wage ratesPay differentialsNurse salariesAge discriminationCPLR article 78State University of New YorkPublic Employees FederationStony Brook University HospitalEducation Law § 355-aCivil Service Law § 130
References
15
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Dobbs-Weinstein v. Vanderbilt University

Plaintiff Idit Dobbs-Weinstein alleged gender and national origin discrimination against Vanderbilt University after being denied tenure, also bringing state law claims for breach of contract and breach of covenant of good faith. While she was eventually granted tenure retroactively by the University after an appeal, she sought damages for emotional harm, professional reputation damage, and lost interest on backpay, and also claimed sex discrimination in faculty salaries. The Court found that Dobbs-Weinstein failed to provide sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of fact regarding discrimination in her tenure denial or in class-wide salary disparities, citing academic reasons for the initial denial and a lack of statistical significance in her wage discrimination claims. Consequently, the Court granted Vanderbilt University's motion for summary judgment, dismissing her federal discrimination claims. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, dismissing them without prejudice.

Tenure denialEmployment discriminationGender discriminationNational origin discriminationTitle VIITennessee Human Rights ActSummary judgmentAcademic freedomFaculty evaluationStatistical analysis
References
43
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Poupard v. Mohonasen Central School District

The claimant, a librarian, sustained an employment-related injury. Following her injury, she received full salary for 27 weeks under a collective bargaining agreement, and then used 23 days of accumulated sick leave. The employer sought reimbursement for these advance payments. The referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board initially granted the full reimbursement. On appeal, the court modified the decision, holding that wages paid from accumulated sick leave, acquired through a collective bargaining agreement, are compulsory payments and thus not reimbursable under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (subd 4, par [a]). The matter was remitted for further proceedings consistent with this ruling, with costs awarded to the claimant.

Workers' CompensationReimbursementSick LeaveCollective Bargaining AgreementAdvance PaymentsOccupational DisabilityStatutory LimitationsAppellate ReviewEmployment InjuryReferee Decision
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Waldstreicher v. Michaelian

This is an Article 78 proceeding initiated by social workers in Westchester County seeking a salary increase as per Social Welfare Law § 79-a for those with suitable graduate training. The county interposed several affirmative defenses, including claims of unconstitutionality, infringement on home rule, and the existence of an alternative incentive plan. The court rejected the county's arguments, affirming the Legislature's power to amend the Civil Service Law and ruling that the matter was of state concern, thus not violating home rule. It also determined that the State Department of Social Welfare's failure to promulgate regulations did not deny qualified persons their benefits, and that local department approval of graduate training was appropriate. The court found the county's purported alternative plan to be invalid due to a lack of state approval. Ultimately, the court granted relief to employees who have completed the necessary graduate training, with a provision for further hearing if individual eligibility issues arise.

Article 78 ProceedingSalary IncreaseSocial Welfare LawCivil Service LawHome RuleGraduate TrainingPublic EmployeesStatutory InterpretationConstitutional LawWestchester County
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 576 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational