CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ2128084 VNO 0428792, ADJ1712801 VNO 0428794, ADJ346332 VNO 0428790, ADJ6882145
Regular
Jan 29, 2019

NAYER GARAS vs. RXI PLASTICS, INC.

The petitioner for reconsideration has withdrawn their petition regarding the November 27, 2018 decision. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has dismissed the petition. This dismissal pertains to case numbers ADJ2128084, ADJ1712801, ADJ346332, and ADJ6882145. The order was issued by WCAB and concurred with by Chair Katherine Zalewski on January 29, 2019.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissedWithdrawnWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardApplicantDefendantCase NumbersOpinion and OrderNovember 27 2018San Francisco California
References
0
Case No. ADJ6882145, ADJ346332 (VNO 0428790), ADJ2128084 (VNO 0428792), ADJ1712801 (VNO 0428794)
Regular
Sep 25, 2015

NAYER GARAS vs. RXI PLASTICS, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a July 10, 2015 decision. This action was taken to allow further study of the factual and legal issues presented in the case. The WCAB needs a complete understanding to issue a just and reasoned decision. All future filings related to the petition for reconsideration must be sent directly to the WCAB Commissioners in San Francisco and not to any district office or via e-filing.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRXI PlasticsInc.State Compensation Insurance FundADJ6882145ADJ346332ADJ2128084ADJ1712801Van Nuys District Office
References
0
Case No. ADJ2128084 (VNO 0428792) ADJ1712801 (VNO 0428794) ADJ346332 (VNO 0428790) ADJ6882145
Regular
Feb 07, 2017

NAYER GARAS vs. RXI PLASTICS, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's order for continuing home health care, finding the record insufficient to support the decision. Although the parties stipulated to timely utilization review denials, the specific RFAs forming the basis for these denials were not adequately documented in the record. The Board determined it could not ascertain whether the defendant's reliance on UR was inappropriate or if the applicant's care was improperly terminated without a change in circumstances. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings to develop a complete record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationPetition for ReconsiderationHome Health CareUtilization ReviewRequest for AuthorizationTreating PhysicianAdministrative Law JudgeLiver TransplantMedical Necessity
References
6
Showing 1-3 of 3 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational