CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 25, 2008

Rodriguez v. Port Authority

Decedent, a police officer for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, died in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. His minor son received New Jersey workers' compensation death benefits. The claimant, decedent's domestic partner and the son's mother, sought New York death benefits for herself. She was awarded benefits commencing June 1, 2007, but the Workers' Compensation Law Judge and the Board granted the employer a credit for the New Jersey payments made to the claimant on her son's behalf, denying her claim for the period between September 11, 2001, and June 1, 2007. The claimant appealed this decision. The appellate court affirmed the employer's entitlement to the credit, preventing an impermissible double recovery. However, the court modified the decision regarding the commencement date of the claimant's New York benefits, finding that New Jersey payments ended on February 17, 2007, not June 1, 2007, and remitted the matter to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with this finding.

Workers' Compensation LawDeath BenefitsSeptember 11 AttacksEmployer CreditDouble Recovery PrincipleDomestic Partner StatusInter-jurisdictional BenefitsRemandAppellate ReviewSelf-insured Employer
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Collins v. Dukes Plumbing & Sewer Service, Inc.

This case involves appeals from three Workers’ Compensation Board decisions concerning the application of 2007 amendments to Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 15 (3) (w) and 27 (2). The amendments mandated lump-sum payments into the aggregate trust fund (ATF) for permanent partial disability (PPD) awards made on or after July 1, 2007, irrespective of the injury date. Employers' private insurance carriers challenged this requirement, asserting improper retroactive application, difficulties in calculating present values for uncapped awards, and constitutional violations. The Board affirmed its prior decisions, holding that the statutory language was unambiguous and rejected all constitutional challenges.

Workers' Compensation LawStatutory InterpretationRetroactive ApplicationPermanent Partial DisabilityAggregate Trust FundConstitutional LawTakings ClauseContract ClauseEqual ProtectionPrivate Insurance Carriers
References
19
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.

This case involves an appeal by private insurance carriers and employers from three decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The Board directed the carriers to deposit funds into the aggregate trust fund (ATF) for uncapped permanent partial disability (PPD) awards, pursuant to a 2007 amendment to Workers’ Compensation Law § 27 (2). The carriers argued that this mandate was an improper retroactive application of the amendment and that the present value of uncapped awards could not be reliably calculated. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decisions, ruling that the amendment applies prospectively to all PPD awards made after July 1, 2007, regardless of the injury date, and that the Legislature explicitly mandated the use of actuarial tables for present value computations, leaving no discretion to the Board.

Workers' Compensation LawPermanent Partial DisabilityAggregate Trust FundLump-sum paymentStatutory InterpretationRetroactivityActuarial TablesUncapped AwardsAppellate ReviewNew York Law
References
12
Case No. ADJ4065552 (VNO 0432340) ADJ1868840 (VNO 0439593)
Regular
Mar 08, 2013

JOSE SEPULVEDA vs. WILD IGUANA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's September 27, 2012 decision. The Board rescinded the prior decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This order is not a final determination on the merits. Parties retain the right to seek reconsideration of the WCJ's future ruling.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for Reconsiderationworkers' compensation administrative law judgeWCJgrant reconsiderationrescind decisionfurther proceedingstrial levelDecision After ReconsiderationVNO District Office
References
0
Case No. 6070 7321 (referencing Employer: McLane Northeast)
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 14, 2011

Angelo v. Chemical

This appeal concerns a Workers’ Compensation Board decision regarding death benefits for the widow of John Angelo, who died from asbestos-related pleural disease. The decedent's occupational disease claim for pleural asbestosis had a disablement date of May 27, 1994. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) established the case for causally-related death, set an average weekly wage of $838.46, and awarded maximum benefits of $500 per week, shifting liability to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. The Special Fund appealed, arguing the lower statutory maximum rate from the 1994 disablement date should apply, not the rate effective at the time of death. The Board upheld the WCLJ's decision, citing Workers’ Compensation Law § 16 (5) (1), which states the increased maximum death benefit rate applies to deaths occurring on or after July 1, 2007. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding the statutory language unambiguous and rejecting the Special Fund's arguments.

Death BenefitsSurviving SpouseOccupational DiseaseAsbestosisPleural DiseaseDisablement DateMaximum Benefit RateStatutory InterpretationSpecial Fund for Reopened CasesWorkers' Compensation Board Appeal
References
2
Case No. VNO 475856, VNO 447039, VNO 447045, VNO 447094, VNO 447095, VNO 448064, VNO 461057
Regular
Jan 17, 2008

ORALIA MONGE vs. LATIN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision. After review, the WCAB affirmed the original findings and orders served on September 5, 2007, in multiple cases involving applicant Oralia Monge and defendants Latin American Civic Association and State Compensation Insurance Fund. The decision was finalized and served on January 17, 2008.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationOpinion and DecisionAffirmationCase NumbersApplicantDefendantsState Compensation Insurance FundBradford & Barthel LLPFloyd Skren & Kelly LLP
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Proulx v. Burnett Process

This case involves appeals from four decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board concerning the application of amendments to Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 15 (3) (w) and 27 (2). The core issue is whether the mandatory deposit of Permanent Partial Disability (PPD) awards into the aggregate trust fund (ATF) under amended § 27 (2) applies retroactively to injuries sustained before the amendment's effective date of March 13, 2007, when the PPD awards themselves were made after July 1, 2007. The carriers argued against retroactive application and claimed that mandating lump-sum payments for uncapped PPD awards was speculative and violated equal protection rights. The Board, and subsequently the Appellate Division, affirmed the decisions, holding that the relevant date for applying the amendment to § 27 (2) is the date of the award, not the date of the accident, and that the calculations are not speculative as present value is legislatively mandated.

Workers' Compensation LawAggregate Trust FundPermanent Partial DisabilityStatutory InterpretationRetroactive ApplicationEqual ProtectionLump-Sum PaymentsAppellate ReviewWorkers' Compensation BoardPresent Value
References
7
Case No. ADJ7091758
Regular
Dec 15, 2011

AARON DAVIS vs. VALLEY AGGREAGE TRANSPORT, INC., TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend a previous decision. Specifically, Finding of Fact No. 4 was amended to reflect the applicant's average weekly wage of $79.55 during the off-season. This amendment establishes a minimum temporary disability indemnity rate of $143.70. The rest of the September 27, 2011 decision was affirmed.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDReconsiderationWCJAMENDEDtemporary disability indemnityaverage weekly wageminimum rate
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Visic v. O'Nero & Sons Construction Co.

Claimant, who sustained a work-related back injury in 2000 and was classified with a permanent partial disability in 2004, sought to reopen their case in 2007, alleging total disability. While a physician opined total disability, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) and subsequently the Workers' Compensation Board determined the claimant had a marked permanent partial disability. The Board's decision, filed September 2, 2008, remitted the matter to reconsider the average weekly wage. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's finding, emphasizing the Board's authority in resolving conflicting medical opinions from physicians like Edward Simmons, Jerry Tracy, Romanth Waghmarae, and Paul Lewis. The court also noted that the issue of average weekly wage was rendered moot by a subsequent stipulation and unappealed Board decision.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityTotal DisabilityMedical OpinionsAverage Weekly WageStipulationAppealBack InjuryReopening CaseBoard Decision
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 27, 2013

Claim of Zogaria v. Quebecor World USA Inc.

This case concerns an appeal by the Special Fund for Reopened Cases from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision filed on December 27, 2013. The claimant sustained a left knee injury in 2005, and her workers' compensation claim was established, with benefits paid by January 2007. In 2012, after her physician requested authorization for knee surgery, which the carrier approved, the claimant underwent the procedure. The carrier then sought to transfer liability to the Special Fund under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a, arguing the case met the criteria of more than seven years since injury and three years since the last benefit payment. Although a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge initially denied the transfer, the Board reversed, finding the case truly closed in February 2012 when surgery was authorized, thus shifting liability to the Special Fund. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concurring that substantial evidence supported the finding of a true closure in February 2012.

Special Fund for Reopened CasesWorkers' Compensation Law § 25-aLiability TransferCase ReopeningTrue ClosureLast Payment of BenefitsSchedule Loss of Use AwardMedical AuthorizationKnee ArthroplastyAppellate Review
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 23,353 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational