CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ2244538 (LAO 0883304)
Regular
Jul 29, 2011

MELVIN ISAAC vs. PARAMOUNT PICTURES

This case involves the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) removing a matter on its own motion to review a Compromise and Release (C&R) order. The WCAB issued a Notice of Intention to approve the C&R with addenda, allowing parties 20 days to object. As no objections were received, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's prior approval and entered a new order approving the C&R with the addenda. The cases are now returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalCompromise and ReleaseAddendaWCJ OrderRescindedApprovedTrial LevelParamount PicturesMelvin Isaac
References
0
Case No. ADJ1186781 (VNO 0516635) ADJ1590743 (VNO 0552326)
Regular
Jun 10, 2013

DANA BONSALL vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Permissibly Self-Insured

Defendant County of Los Angeles petitioned to set aside an order compelling payment of $14,500 to lien claimant, The 4600 Group. The defendant argued the order was based on mistake, as they were unaware of prior payments made to Burbank Podiatry, which was part of the lien claim. Crucially, the assigned judge realized she was disqualified due to previously serving as defense counsel in this matter. The Appeals Board granted the petition, rescinded the prior order, and remanded the case to a new judge to determine if the settlement should be set aside.

WCABPetition to Set AsideStipulation and OrderLien ClaimantWCJ DisqualificationRule 9721.12(c)(2)Good CauseRescinded OrderRemandBurbank Podiatry
References
0
Case No. ADJ11252070, ADJ11527187
Regular
Dec 04, 2018

Gregory Ruth vs. Swift Transportation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as premature. The applicant sought to set aside a compromise and release agreement, alleging duress and unauthorized representation in one of the case numbers. The Board found that there was insufficient evidence to assess the applicant's claims. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for consideration of the applicant's claims as a petition to set aside the compromise and release.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCompromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationJoint Order ApprovingDuressSet Aside SettlementGood CauseProcedural IrregularitiesPremature PetitionTrial Level
References
9
Case No. ADJ9343159, ADJ1368987 (MON0362038)
Regular
Sep 15, 2017

JAMES ISAAC vs. UNITED AIRLINES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed United Airlines' petition as procedurally improper. United Airlines filed a "Petition to Set Aside Order Approving Compromise and Release" instead of the correct "Petition for Reconsideration." The WCAB will return the matter to the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) to address United Airlines' original petition. This ruling does not substantively rule on the merits of setting aside the compromise and release.

Petition to Set AsideOrder Approving Compromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJDismissedGallagher Bassett ServicesUnited AirlinesADJ9343159ADJ1368987
References
0
Case No. ADJ7793819 ADJ8527743 ADJ7742174
Regular
Jun 06, 2013

EVERETT JOHNSON vs. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, CORVEL

The Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration as moot because the order sought to be reconsidered was rescinded pending a decision on the applicant's petition to set aside the Compromise and Release. The defendant's Petition for Removal was also denied as they were not currently aggrieved. The matter is returned to the WCJ to hear and rule on the applicant's Petition to Set Aside Order Approving Compromise and Release. The defendant may seek reconsideration after a final order on the settlement is issued.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalCompromise and Releaseattorney feesWCJset aside ordermisrepresentationfraudcumulative trauma
References
0
Case No. ADJ1653878 (VNO 0560916), ADJ4156597 (VNO 0561366)
Regular
Mar 21, 2019

ALFREDO BRIBIESCA vs. COLLISION 2000 AUTOBODY & PAINT, COLLISION 2000, INC., MINH V. LY, RAYMOND CAM

This case concerns a defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, which was dismissed as untimely. The petition was filed on January 23, 2019, but the deadline to file, based on the served Order Approving Compromise and Release on June 15, 2018, was July 10, 2018. Although the petition is dismissed procedurally, the Board noted the allegation of good cause to set aside the Compromise and Release. Therefore, the WCJ is directed to treat the petition as seeking to set aside the agreement for good cause and schedule a hearing.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingJurisdictional Time LimitWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseProof of ServiceGood CauseSet AsideDue Process
References
0
Case No. ADJ9797482
Regular
Nov 13, 2015

LATICIA PERKINS vs. MACY'S WEST STORES, INC.

This case involves an untimely Petition for Reconsideration challenging a $10,000.00 Compromise and Release settlement approved for an unrepresented applicant. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petition due to untimeliness but granted removal on its own motion to address the applicant's allegations of duress, coercion, and lack of understanding regarding her injury's permanent impairment rating. The Board rescinded the order denying the applicant's petition to set aside the settlement and suspended the original settlement approval. The matter is remanded for the WCJ to conduct further proceedings to determine if "good cause" exists to set aside the Compromise and Release.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCompromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationPetition to Set AsideRemovalDuressCoercionUndue InfluencePrimary Treating PhysicianPermanent and Stationary Report
References
5
Case No. ADJ339464 (LBO 0318588)
Regular
Apr 22, 2019

MELVIN DEAN vs. M. B. HERZOG CORP., INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a former attorney's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The attorney sought to overturn an order approving a compromise and release, alleging her lien for attorney fees was improperly handled by current counsel and the WCJ. Although the petition was dismissed for jurisdictional reasons, the WCAB recommended the trial judge treat it as a petition to set aside the order due to allegations of extrinsic fraud or mutual mistake regarding the attorney's lien. A hearing will be necessary to present evidence and allow the WCJ to issue a decision on setting aside the compromise and release.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseLien ClaimantAttorney FeesTimelinessJurisdictional GroundsPetition to Set AsideExtrinsic FraudMutual Mistake
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 29, 2004

Velella v. New York Local Condotional Release Commission

The petitioners, including Gonzalez, Caba, Stephens, Velella, and DelToro, challenged determinations by the Conditional Release Commission and the Department of Correction. These determinations advised petitioners that their conditional releases were invalid and directed them to surrender. The Supreme Court, New York County, denied their five CPLR article 78 petitions. This appellate court unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, finding the petitioners' conditional releases illegal due to non-compliance with Correction Law § 273 (1) and (6). The court also ruled that the agencies had the power to set aside determinations based on significant irregularities and that the petitioners had no substantive due process right to illegal orders, having been afforded adequate procedural due process through the CPLR article 78 proceedings.

Conditional ReleaseCorrection Law ViolationsDue ProcessArticle 78 PetitionAgency AuthorityIllegal ReleaseStatutory InterpretationAppellate ReviewGovernment EstoppelNew York Law
References
14
Case No. ADJ498505 (SFO 0420916) ADJ6979901
Regular
Feb 27, 2012

DEBORAH ROLLINS vs. COUNTY OF SOLANO

This case concerns applicant Deborah Rollins' petition to reconsider the denial of her request to set aside a Compromise and Release (C&R) agreement. The WCAB denied reconsideration, upholding the original decision that the C&R, including a broad general release of claims, was valid and could not be set aside. Applicant argued the general release was boilerplate, she was unaware of its scope, and she was incompetent due to her medical condition. The Board found the general release enforceable based on the applicant's signature and her attorney's testimony that it was explained. The Board also found insufficient evidence of incompetency or grounds for unilateral mistake to invalidate the agreement.

Compromise and ReleaseGeneral ReleaseSet Aside AgreementLabor Code section 5803IncompetencyUnilateral Mistake of FactBoilerplate LanguagePetition for ReconsiderationOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseGood Cause
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 2,015 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational