CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7082851
Regular
Jan 30, 2019

HUMBERTO GONZALEZ vs. AMERICAN AUTO WRECKING, STAR INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend the original findings, establishing applicant's earnings at $500.00 per week. The Board affirmed the finding of industrial injury to the psyche and right inguinal hernia, but deferred issues of injury to the reproductive system (sexual dysfunction) and sleep disorder. The matter was returned to the WCJ for further development of the record concerning these deferred issues, particularly regarding the specific impact of sleep disorder on impairment and corroboration of sexual dysfunction.

AOE/COEFindings and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeAgreed Medical ExaminerQualified Medical ExaminerMaximum Medical ImprovementGeneral LaborerRight inguinal herniaSexual dysfunction
References
0
Case No. ADJ7037201
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

Eddie Avakian vs. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, ADMINSURE

This case involves an applicant police officer seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision that awarded 72% permanent partial disability. The applicant contended the WCJ erred by excluding sleep disturbances and sexual dysfunction from the disability rating and by apportioning his cardiovascular disability. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the original award, and found the applicant's sexual dysfunction and sleep disorder compensable. The matter was returned to the trial level for a new decision, with the WCAB stating it would not disturb other findings, including the hypertension apportionment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardEddie AvakianCity of Baldwin ParkPermissibly Self-InsuredAdministered By ADMINSUREADJ7037201Opinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings and Award and OrderAdministrative Law Judge
References
0
Case No. ADJ6619965 ADJ9843987
Regular
Jul 16, 2018

JESUS ZARAGOZA vs. KOOL KOUNTRY, LLC, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Board granted reconsideration to review the finding of injury to the bladder, sleep disorder, sexual dysfunction, and cognitive disability/headaches, as well as the applicant's earnings. The Board affirmed the finding of injury to the bladder, sleep disorder, and sexual dysfunction but reversed the finding of injury related to cognitive impairment/headaches, finding insufficient medical evidence. Additionally, the Board amended the applicant's earnings to $270.00 per week, based on the parties' stipulation regarding the permanent disability rate, and affirmed the overall award except for these specific modifications.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactAwardAdministrative Law JudgePermanent DisabilityAverage Weekly EarningsStipulationAgreed Medical ExaminerQualified Medical Examiner
References
0
Case No. ADJ8023073
Regular
Mar 08, 2018

ERIKA GOMEZ GONZALEZ vs. FRONT PORCH, permissibly self-insured

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the prior award finding industrial injury, including to the psyche and sexual dysfunction, stemming from an exploding electrical outlet. The Board affirmed the award, specifically ruling that the exploding outlet constituted a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" exempting the applicant from the six-month employment rule for psychiatric injuries. However, the Board rescinded the specific EDD reimbursement amount and remanded that issue for further proceedings. A dissenting commissioner argued the incident was routine and the sexual dysfunction lacked objective evidence.

Labor Code section 3208.3(d)sudden and extraordinary employment conditionpsychiatric injurysexual dysfunctionEmployment Development Department (EDD) reimbursementsubstantial evidencemedical opiniondioxine electrical outlettemporary disability indemnitypermanent disability
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 16, 2000

Thompson v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

The Supreme Court, New York County, affirmed a judgment denying damages for future pain and suffering and loss of consortium to a construction worker and his wife following a personal injury suit. The jury found insufficient persuasive medical evidence to corroborate the plaintiff's subjective complaints of persistent headaches, low back pain, and sexual dysfunction. Evidence showed the plaintiff had not maintained a continuous course of treatment and had a pre-existing degenerative spinal disease. While the plaintiff was awarded damages for future loss of earnings due to disability from strenuous work, his claims for ongoing pain and sexual dysfunction were deemed incredible or unrelated to the accident. The court also upheld the trial court's charge on the plaintiff's duty to mitigate damages by seeking vocational rehabilitation, given the credibility issues surrounding his ability to work.

Personal InjuryConstruction AccidentFuture Pain and SufferingLoss of ConsortiumMedical EvidenceCredibility AssessmentMitigation of DamagesVocational RehabilitationPre-existing ConditionJury Verdict
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Hare v. Champion International

Claimant suffered head, neck, and back injuries in 1991 while working as a millwright for Champion International. His workers' compensation case was closed in 1993, with a finding of no compensable lost time after November 1991. In 1997, claimant's pain worsened, and he sought authorization for Viagra for work-related sexual dysfunction, which Champion's carrier denied. In 1999, Champion sold its mill, and the new owner did not rehire the claimant. He then sought compensation for lost time, alleging the non-rehire was due to his disability from the 1991 accident. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and subsequently the Workers’ Compensation Board found his unemployment was due to economic conditions and denied a causal link for sexual dysfunction. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the claimant failed to prove his inability to obtain employment was due to his accident-related disabilities, and that the Board properly resolved conflicting medical evidence.

Workers' CompensationSexual DysfunctionLost WagesEconomic ConditionsRehireDisability ClaimMedical EvidenceCausationAppellate ReviewBurden of Proof
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 31, 1996

In re Keisha McL.

This case involves an order of disposition from the Family Court, Bronx County, entered on July 31, 1996. The order placed the subject children with the Commissioner for the Administration of Children’s Services for 12 months and directed their foster care agency to commence a termination of parental rights proceeding. This action was taken based on a fact-finding determination that the respondent had sexually abused two of the children. The children's out-of-court statements regarding the abuse were cross-corroborated by each other and further supported by consistent repetitions to their foster mother, a psychologist, and a social worker. Expert testimony confirmed the children's knowledge of sexual acts and symptomatic behavioral changes. The court inferred that the touching was for sexual gratification due to the absence of an innocent explanation. The order was unanimously affirmed.

Child Sexual AbuseFamily CourtTermination of Parental RightsChild WelfareExpert TestimonyCorroborated StatementsChild Protection ServicesDispositional OrderSexual Gratification InferenceBehavioral Changes
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 31, 2009

In re Selena R.

The Family Court of Bronx County issued an order of disposition finding a father guilty of sexually abusing his son, Tyler T., derivatively abusing Selena R., and neglecting both children. The court released the children to the mother's custody under strict supervision and restricted the father's contact with them. The appellate court modified the order, vacating the finding of neglect due to excessive corporal punishment, but affirmed the remaining aspects of the decision. The sexual abuse finding was corroborated by a social worker's testimony detailing the children's symptomatic behavior, including age-inappropriate sexual knowledge. However, the claim of excessive corporal punishment was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

sexual abusechild neglectderivative abusecorporal punishmentfamily court lawappellate procedureevidence sufficiencysocial worker testimonychild welfareparental rights
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 22, 1995

In re Najam M.

The Family Court's dismissal of a child abuse petition, brought by the Commissioner of Social Services and the Law Guardian for Najam M. against her respondent father, was reversed on appeal. The appellate court reinstated the petition and entered a finding of sexual abuse, remanding the case for further proceedings. Expert medical testimony from Dr. Jamie Hoffman Rosenfeld, a child abuse specialist, detailed physical abnormalities in the child consistent with chronic manipulation and sexual abuse, which she affirmed could not be self-inflicted. The child's consistent allegations of abuse by her father, made to multiple individuals, further supported the medical findings. The court determined that the petitioner had established a prima facie case of child abuse, which the parents' explanation failed to rebut.

Child AbuseSexual AbuseFamily CourtAppellate ReversalExpert Medical TestimonyHymenal InjuryPrima Facie CaseBurden of ProofChild InterviewParental Explanation Rebuttal
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

People v. Guce

The defendant appealed a judgment convicting him of rape, sodomy, sexual abuse, incest, and endangering the welfare of a child. The appeal challenged the Supreme Court's decision to allow the child victims to testify via live, two-way, closed-circuit television, with the defendant remaining outside the room, citing their vulnerability and potential for severe emotional harm. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding that these procedures were constitutional and supported by clear and convincing evidence of extraordinary circumstances and the children's vulnerability. The court also found no error in allowing sworn and unsworn testimony, the use of anatomically correct dolls, or the admissibility of expert testimony regarding child sexual abuse syndrome, distinguishing the case from previous rulings.

Child Sexual AbuseVulnerable WitnessesConfrontation ClauseClosed-Circuit Television TestimonyWitness TraumaAppellate ReviewSixth AmendmentFourteenth AmendmentExpert TestimonyPosttraumatic Stress Syndrome
References
10
Showing 1-10 of 662 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational