CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 10, 2021

Matter of Gaylord v. Buffalo Transp., Inc.

Claimant Kevin Gaylord, a bus driver for Buffalo Transportation, Inc., sustained multiple injuries after being struck by a car. Buffalo Transportation had a personnel leasing agreement with Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc. (SPLI), a professional employer organization, which procured a workers' compensation policy from State National Insurance Company, Inc. State National controverted Gaylord's claim, arguing he was not a covered worksite employee. The Workers' Compensation Board determined that SPLI was statutorily obligated to provide coverage and State National was the proper carrier. The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed, concluding that SPLI was a co-employer and the State National policy covered Gaylord, as it did not clearly exclude him.

Workers' CompensationProfessional Employer OrganizationPEOCo-employmentInsurance Coverage DisputeStatutory ObligationAppellate ReviewCarrier LiabilityLease AgreementBus Driver Injury
References
8
Case No. ADJ11328040
Regular
Nov 05, 2019

GREGORIO HERNANDEZ vs. SOUTHEAST PERSONNEL LEASING, INC., STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PACKARD CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding that the applicant was not covered by the Southeast Personnel Leasing (SPL) insurance policy. The applicant, employed by JL Furnishings, claimed SPL's policy, which covered employees leased from JL Furnishings, should also cover him. However, the Board found that since the applicant was not a leased employee of SPL, SPL had no employer liability for his injury. Therefore, the SPL policy, by its terms and endorsements compliant with regulations, did not provide coverage for the applicant's claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSoutheast Personnel LeasingState National InsurancePackard Claims AdministrationFindings and Awardleased employeesemployee leasing arrangementLabor Code 3602(d)joint and several liabilityProfessional Employer Organization
References
10
Case No. 533111
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 31, 2023

In the Matter of the Claim of Tara Brown

The claimant, Tara Brown, sought workers' compensation benefits for injuries sustained during employment as a medical driver. Buffalo Transportation, Inc. was initially identified as the employer, with State National Insurance Company, Inc. (carrier for Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc. - SPLI) providing coverage. The Workers' Compensation Board initially found Buffalo Transportation liable and State National as the carrier. However, the Board later amended its decision, ruling that Brown was not a leased employee of SPLI, thus not covered by State National's policy, and rescinded State National's liability. As a result of this amended decision, the instant appeal by SPLI and State National from the original September 10, 2020 decision was dismissed as moot because they were no longer aggrieved parties.

Workers' CompensationEmployment InjuryMotor Vehicle AccidentEmployee LeasingInsurance Coverage DisputeMoot AppealAppellate DivisionCarrier LiabilityBoard Decision AmendmentThird Judicial Department
References
4
Case No. ADJ10560449
Regular
Sep 28, 2018

CYNTHIA AVALOS vs. YOUNGS CARGO, INC., SOUTHEAST PERSONNEL LEASING, INC., STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where the applicant, Cynthia Avalos, sustained injuries while driving for Young's Cargo, Inc. (YCI). Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc. (SPLI), argued it was not the applicant's employer, citing a co-employment agreement with YCI and the timing of receiving application paperwork. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied SPLI's petition for reconsideration and dismissed its petition for removal. The Board affirmed the finding of joint and several liability for both SPLI and YCI, based on evidence of a dual employment relationship and SPLI's retroactive ratification of the applicant's employment status by issuing a paycheck.

Dual employmentSpecial employmentJoint and several liabilityCo-employment agreementRetroactive ratificationThreshold issueFindings of Fact and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cruz v. Regent Leasing Ltd. Partnership

Plaintiff Roberto Cruz commenced an action against Regent Leasing Limited Partnership for personal injuries sustained during a slip and fall. Cruz, a superintendent, was an employee of Mid-State Management Corp., hired by Regent Leasing to manage the property. Defendant Regent Leasing moved for summary judgment, arguing that the exclusivity of workers' compensation benefits precluded the action, suggesting plaintiff should be deemed their employee. The court denied the motion, finding no employer-employee or co-employer relationship between Cruz and Regent Leasing. The decision clarified that merely hiring an employer to manage premises does not establish an employer-employee relationship within the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Slip and FallPersonal InjuryWorkers' Compensation LawExclusive RemedySummary JudgmentEmployer-Employee RelationshipCo-EmployerManaging AgentLandowner LiabilityPremises Liability
References
17
Case No. ADJ11054250
Regular
Jun 25, 2018

MARIA POLANCO HERNANDEZ vs. IMPERATIVE PERSONNEL, INC., through SOUTHEAST PERSONNEL LEASING, INC.

The Appeals Board granted removal and rescinded the WCJ's order for an additional dental QME panel. The Board found the order interlocutory and improperly issued without sufficient evidence or a hearing to establish good cause. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, and the petition for reconsideration was dismissed.

WCABRemovalReconsiderationQME PanelDentistryLaborerContinuous TraumaDeclaration of ReadinessMandatory Settlement ConferenceInterlocutory Order
References
7
Case No. 536090
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 14, 2023

In the Matter of the Claim of Tara Brown

Tara Brown sought workers' compensation for injuries sustained as a medical transport driver. The Workers' Compensation Board initially found Buffalo Transportation, Inc. to be her employer and State National Insurance Company as the responsible carrier. However, in an amended decision, the Board concluded that Brown was an employee of Buffalo Transportation but *not* a leased employee covered by State National's policy with Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc. Consequently, the Uninsured Employers' Fund was put on notice due to Buffalo Transportation's lack of coverage. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence supported the distinction from previous cases and the finding that Brown was not a leased employee.

Workers' CompensationEmployment RelationshipProfessional Employment Organization (PEO)Leased EmployeesInsurance CoverageUninsured Employers' FundAppellate ReviewJudicial ReviewEvidence SufficiencyBoard Jurisdiction
References
10
Case No. 2023 NY Slip Op 06422 [222 AD3d 1147]
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 14, 2023

Matter of Brown v. Buffalo Transp., Inc.

Claimant Tara Brown sought workers' compensation benefits after a motor vehicle accident, identifying Buffalo Transportation, Inc. as her employer. The Workers' Compensation Board initially found Brown was an employee of Buffalo Transportation and that State National Insurance Company, as the carrier for Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc. (SPLI), was responsible for coverage. However, the Board later amended its decision, affirming Brown's employment with Buffalo Transportation but concluding she was not a leased employee covered by SPLI's policy, thus placing the Uninsured Employers' Fund on notice. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's amended decision, upholding the finding that Brown was an employee of Buffalo Transportation and not a leased employee, thereby distinguishing the matter from prior similar cases.

Workers' Compensation BenefitsEmployment RelationshipProfessional Employer Organization (PEO)Insurance Coverage DisputesEmployer LiabilityUninsured Employers' FundAppellate ReviewBoard Decision AmendmentMotor Vehicle Accident ClaimStatutory Interpretation
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 13, 1985

Linares v. Spencer-Cameron Leasing Corp.

The plaintiff appealed an order granting summary judgment to the defendants, Time Moving and Storage (employer) and Spencer-Cameron Leasing Corp. (vehicle lessor), in a personal injury action. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, finding that the Workers' Compensation Law provided the plaintiff's exclusive remedy against both the employer and the vehicle owner, as the injury occurred while the plaintiff was a passenger in an employer-leased vehicle driven by a co-employee. The court also affirmed the denial of the plaintiff's cross-motion to amend the complaint and bill of particulars, citing the significant delay (nearly four years after inception of the lawsuit) and completion of all discovery.

Personal InjurySummary JudgmentWorkers' Compensation LawExclusive RemedyCo-employee NegligenceLeased Vehicle LiabilityAppellate AffirmationMotion to Amend PleadingsBill of ParticularsDelay in Litigation
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Castro v. Salem Truck Leasing, Inc.

The defendants, Salem Truck Leasing, Inc., and Jose E. Cofresi, appealed an order denying their motion for summary judgment in a personal injury action. The plaintiff was a passenger in a truck operated by Cofresi and owned by Salem, and both were co-employees involved in an accident during their employment. The appeals court modified the order, granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Cofresi, citing Workers' Compensation Law co-employee immunity. However, the court affirmed the denial of summary judgment for Salem Truck Leasing, Inc., as a triable issue of fact existed regarding Salem's alleged independent negligence in maintaining the truck.

Personal InjurySummary JudgmentWorkers' Compensation LawCo-employee ImmunityVehicle AccidentTruck LeasingNegligenceAppellate ReviewMotion PracticeKings County
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 759 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational