CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 16, 1979

In re David R.

The New York City Department of Social Services petitioned for approval to transfer the custody of David R. under a 'Voluntary Placement Agreement' signed by the maternal grandmother. The child was under two months old and hospitalized at the time. The court evaluated the validity of the agreement, questioning if the maternal grandmother had the right or understanding to place the child, particularly due to a language barrier as she only spoke Spanish and no interpreter was provided during the signing. The court found no binding contract existed, citing the grandmother's lack of authority to place the child, the language problem, and deliberate misrepresentation by the department. Furthermore, the court found that the placement was not in the child's best interests, as the department failed to contact the parents before accepting placement. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the child was to be returned to the parents.

Child CustodyVoluntary Placement AgreementSocial Services LawContract ValidityLanguage BarrierDue ProcessParental RightsMaternal GrandmotherFamily Court JurisdictionBest Interests of the Child
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 08, 1972

Claim of Marciniak v. Berlitz School of Languages

The claimant, a French teacher, was injured on his way home after teaching a class at an alternate location (Hospital for Special Surgery) following his regular shift at the employer's main school. The Workmen’s Compensation Board denied his claim, but the court reversed this decision. The court reasoned that the claimant, when traveling to and from the remote teaching assignment, was acting as an 'outside worker.' Citing established precedents, the court concluded that the homeward journey from such a special work assignment falls within the course of employment. Therefore, the Board's decision was reversed, and the case was sent back for further proceedings consistent with this ruling.

Worker's CompensationOutside EmployeeCourse of EmploymentTravel InjuryDual Employment LocationAppealRemittalSpecial Errand RuleWork-Related Injury
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Soo Tsui

The case involves an appeal from decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board regarding Language Services Associates, Inc.'s (LSA) liability for unemployment insurance contributions. A claimant, a Cantonese and Mandarin interpreter, filed for benefits after ceasing work for LSA. The Department of Labor determined she was an employee, not an independent contractor, making LSA liable. LSA appealed, but an Administrative Law Judge and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed the Department's determination. The court, in turn, affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence of an employer-employee relationship based on LSA's control over assignments, payment practices, and performance monitoring. The court also upheld LSA's liability for similarly situated individuals and found no conflict with Department of Labor guidelines for the translating and interpreting industry.

Employment StatusIndependent ContractorEmployer-Employee RelationshipUnemployment Insurance ContributionsInterpretersTranslation ServicesDepartment of LaborUnemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSubstantial EvidenceWorker Classification
References
11
Case No. ADJ9072448
Regular
Aug 24, 2015

SANDRA HERNANDEZ vs. INN OF SPANISH GARDENS, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the defendant, Inn of Spanish Gardens and its insurer. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted this petition. The Board needs more time to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Further proceedings may be held to address the petition.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationSTATUTORY TIME CONSTRAINTSFACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUESJUST AND REASONED DECISIONFURTHER PROCEEDINGSOFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONERSELECTRONIC ADJUDICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMEAMS
References
0
Case No. ADJ1 130470 (LBO 0359020)
Regular
Feb 18, 2016

SIGUIDFREDO OVANDO vs. BODYCOTE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (BODYCOTE LINDBERG), TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS AND ITS PROPERTY CASUALTY AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Appeals Board dismissed the lien claimant's petition for removal and granted its petition for reconsideration. The Board found the employer failed to adequately notify the applicant about its Medical Provider Network (MPN), particularly due to the applicant's limited English proficiency and insufficient Spanish-language notices. Consequently, the original Findings and Order disallowing the lien were rescinded, and the case was returned for further proceedings.

MPN notificationLabor Code 4616.3Rule 9767.12self-procured treatmentpetition for removalpetition for reconsiderationFindings and Orderstipulated injurylien claimantburden of proof
References
1
Case No. ADJ7965722
Regular
Mar 20, 2018

Nicolas Valencia vs. MAS MALO, WILLIAMSBURG NATIONAL INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a prior award. The defendant failed to properly notify the applicant of their medical provider network rights, specifically neglecting to provide Spanish language notice. Furthermore, the defendant did not prove that the medical treatment provided by lien claimants was unreasonable or unnecessary. The Board found that the defendant's utilization review was invalid due to lack of proper service and communication.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMedical Provider NetworkUtilization ReviewPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact & AwardLien ClaimantsReasonable and Necessary TreatmentPrimary Treating PhysicianAgreed Medical ExaminerCompromise and Release
References
2
Case No. ADJ3666697
Regular
Nov 18, 2010

JOSE GUADALUPE AGUAYO vs. THE PETERSEN COLLECTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a lien claim by Global Interpreting for services provided to applicant Jose Guadalupe Aguayo. The trial judge denied the lien, finding that Spanish interpretation during medical treatment is not a compensable cost in Los Angeles, treating it as a normal business expense. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the denial, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board held that the compensability of interpretation services must be assessed based on individual circumstances and evidence, not categorically denied due to the language or location.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantReconsiderationFindings and OrderAdministrative law judgeInterpreting servicesLabor CodeReasonable and necessaryCompensabilityBurden of proof
References
0
Case No. ADJ2187609 (FRE 0247873)
Regular
Dec 28, 2012

ALICIA ESTRADA vs. FOOTHILL PACKING, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL

This case involves an applicant's claim for workers' compensation benefits due to an industrial injury. The defendant sought reconsideration and removal of an order requiring the applicant to be examined by a Spanish-speaking neuropsychologist. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration, finding the order interlocutory and not a final determination of substantive rights. While the Board denied removal, one Commissioner dissented, arguing the WCJ erred by relying on inapplicable protocols and mandating a language-specific examiner rather than a certified interpreter, which could cause substantial prejudice and set an improper precedent.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationRemovalWCJQualified Medical ExaminerAgreed Medical ExaminerComing and Going RuleDoctor ShoppingLabor CodeInterlocutory Order
References
7
Case No. ADJ10171082
Regular
Nov 05, 2019

Mercedes Cuevas vs. Pacific Union Conference of Seventh Day Adventists, Cambridge Administrators, LLC

This case concerns whether the defendant provided adequate notice to the applicant regarding her workers' compensation rights, specifically concerning the statute of limitations. The applicant, who does not speak English, received notices only in English, which may violate Labor Code Section 5401's requirement for notices to be available in both English and Spanish. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior findings and returned the case for further proceedings to determine if the statute of limitations should be tolled. The WCAB emphasized the need to investigate whether the applicant had actual knowledge of her rights and obligations despite the language barrier.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactPermanent Disability Benefits DenialReynolds v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.Statute of LimitationsTollingSection 5401Spanish Language NoticeInformation and Assistance Officer
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Long Island College Hospital v. New York State Labor Relations Board

This case concerns a judicial review of an order from the New York State Labor Relations Board (NYSLLB) that directed a petitioner to bargain with Local 144 and extended Local 144's certification. The court annulled the NYSLLB's order and denied its cross-petition for enforcement, instead directing a new election for employees. While the court affirmed the NYSLLB's use of a self-determination election and multiquestion ballot, it found the certification and order lacked substantial evidence and were contrary to law. This was due to issues including insufficient Spanish-language election notices, blank ballots, and potentially misleading inaccuracies in Local 144's 'Special Edition' newspaper, which the petitioner could not adequately counter. A dissenting opinion argued the board did not abuse its discretion and its findings were supported by evidence.

Labor LawUnion ElectionsBargaining RepresentativeUnfair Labor PracticesJudicial ReviewSelf-DeterminationBallot IrregularitiesSubstantial EvidenceNew ElectionLabor Relations Board
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 348 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational